Terms and the interpretation of contracts Flashcards
What are the three groups of statements that are made by parties during negotiations leading up to a contract?
-Mere puffs-statements of no legal significance
-Representations-statements of fact or law which the parties do not intend to be binding (if false, a claim for misrepresentation might be possible)
-Terms-statements of fact which the parties intend to be binding (breach gives rise to a claim for breach of contract)
What is the difference between a representation and a term?
A term is intended to be binding whereas a representation is not.
What guidelines do the Court take into account when considering whether a parties intended a statement to be binding?
-Importance-if the injured party considered the statement so important that it would have not have entered into the contract but for that statement, it may be regarded as a term.
-Timing-more likely to be a term of the contract if made at the time of contracting rather than at an early stage of negotiations.
-Reduction into writing-if not included in writing, it is unlikely to be a term as a term would have been included in any written agreement.
-Special knowledge/skill-where the party who made the statement had exclusive access to information or special knowledge as compared with the other party, this is likely to be taken into account in the latter’s favour.
-Assumption of responsibility/further checks-a statement may become a term of the contract where the vendor expressly accepts the responsibility for the soundness of the sale item in question.
What are the four ways in which express terms can be agreed/incorporated into a contract?
- Signed written contract
- Incorporation by notice
- Incorporation by a course of dealing
- Other ways of agreeing express terms (verbal agreement, email agreement)
Does a signed written contract show that the parties intend to be bound?
Yes, even if a party signing has not read or understood what the contract means.
The exception is if the document signed was not one which was intended to have any contractual effect-Grogan v Robin Meredith Plant Hire (1996).
How can terms be incorporated by notice, refer to Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking (1971)?
Terms can be incorporated by notice if one party notifies the other party of them before or at the time of contracting, but reasonable steps must be taken to bring them to the other party’s attention.
Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking (1971): where a party wants to incorporate terms which are particularly adverse to the other party, it must clearly bring these to the other party’s attention eg printed in red ink, with a red hand pointing to it.
How can terms be incorporated by a course of dealing and what constitutes a course of dealing?
Where a clause has been brought to the notice of the other party during previous dealings, it may be implied into the current transaction to give effect to the presumed intentions of the parties even though it has been omitted.
In order for this rule to operate, it must be shown that the course of dealing has been consistent over a period of time.
Petrotrade Inc v Texaco Ltd (1999): only a few occasions over a number of years is not consistent and regular enough, whereas 3-4 times a month and 5 times over 13 months is sufficient.
What are other ways of agreeing express terms?
Obvious and common examples include the agreement of terms in a conversation or verbal exchange, or terms being set out in writing and the other party agreeing to those (vie email).
What is an entire agreement clause?
This means that the parties agree that this agreement constitutes the entire agreement between them, and supersedes any previous understandings or arrangements between them.
How can terms be implied and is an implied term binding to the same extent as an express term?
Terms can be implied on the basis of fact or law. An implied term is binding to the same extent as an express term.
How may terms be implied in fact?
-Trade or professional customs-where a term is implied on the grounds of a custom, the implication is based on the assumption that it was the intention of the parties to be bound by well known customs of a particular trade: British Crane Hire v Ipswich Plant (1975).
-A course of dealing between the parties-parties have dealt with each on many occasions over a long period of time
-Business efficacy-to make the contract produce its intended objective. Only implied if without the implied term, the arrangement would be so unworkable that sensible people could not be supposed to have entered into it: Barton v Morris (2023).
How may terms be implied in law?
-Terms implied at common law e.g. landlord and tenant relationship
-Terms implied by statute e.g. CRA 2015
What is the implied term under S12 SGA 1979?
S12-title, the seller has the right to sell the goods. This is a condition of the contract.
What is the implied term under S13(1) SGA 1979?
S13(1)-description, the goods will correspond with their description. This is a condition of the contract.
What is the implied term under S14(2) SGA 1979?
S14(2)-satisfactory quality, this standard is met if they meet the standard a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory.