Terms Flashcards

1
Q

Southern Foundries Ltd v Shirlaw 1939

A

showed the use of the officious bystander test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The Moorcock 1884

A

contract about mooring of boat did not make sense without term of suitability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Liverpool City Council v Irwin 1976

A

courts not prepared to imply the term to maintain & repair stairwell as it was impossible to constantly maintain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Hutton v Warren 1836

A

custom to compensate farmers whose tenancies run out before harvest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

British Crane Hire v Ipswich Plant Hire 1976

A

usually the hirees responsibility to return machines - in same business so trade practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hardwick Game Farm v Suffolk Agricultural Association 1969

A

contracted 3-4 times per month (5yr+) - no discussion as to why usual term was to be omitted - previous course of dealings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hollier v Rambler Motors 1972

A

contracted 3-4 times over 5 years - no previous course of dealings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rowland v Divall 1923

A

car not his as it had been stolen - the person who had sold him it did not have the right to title so it had to go back

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Beale v Taylor 1967

A

“1961 Triumph Herald Convertible” was 2 halves from 2 cars - did not match description

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Christopher Hull Fine Art 1990

A

claim failed for fake painting as buyer was an expert & the seller was not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Re Moore and Landauer 1921

A

peaches not sold in specified box size - minor but valid breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Rogers v Parish (Scarborough) Ltd 1987

A

new range rover with repairable problems was not of satisfactory quality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Shine v General Guarantee Corp 1988

A

second hand car with problems found to have been completely submerged under water for 24 hours+ - not satisfactory or merchantable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bartlett v Sydney Marcus Ltd 1965

A

car with faulty clutch - given choice of repair or discount - took discount but could not get it repaired cheaper - couldn’t rely on satisfactory quality as he had made the choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Godley v Perry 1960

A

catapult which flicked back and hit child was not fit for purpose as it could not be used without pulling elastic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Wilson v Best Travel 1982

A

holiday company checked hotel matched local standards, not UK standards - not done with reasonable skill and care

17
Q

Lawson v Supasinks Ltd 1984

A

kitchen was not fit with reasonable skill and care

18
Q

Charnock v Liverpool Corp 1968

A

car took twice as long to be fixed than expected time - not done within reasonable time

19
Q

Poussard v Spiers & Pond 1876

A

opera singer fell ill & missed all rehearsals & opening week - breach of condition as it effected the whole contract

20
Q

Bettini v Gye 1876

A

opera singer fell ill & missed half rehearsals - breach of warranty as it didn’t effect contact (able to claim for missed rehearsals)

21
Q

Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd 1962

A

boat hired for 24 month - took 4 month to repair - started as innominate term - breach of warranty as most of contract could still go on

22
Q

Aerial Advertising Co v Batchelors Peas 1938

A

condition breached as flying over memorial service was detrimental to reputation

23
Q

L’Estrange v Graucob 1934

A

signed the document without reading it - bound to exclusion clause

24
Q

Curtis v Chemical Cleaning Co 1951

A

innocent misrepresentation of the exclusion clause about damage

25
Q

Chapelton v Barry UDC 1940

A

exclusion clause given after acceptance was made so was invalid

26
Q

Olley v Marlborough Court Hotel

A

exclusion clause given inside hotel room door (after acceptance was made) so was invalid

27
Q

Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking 1971

A

subtle exclusion clause given outside of car park - acceptance made at ticket machine so was invalid

28
Q

Karsales v Wallis 1956

A

exclusion clause on liability for defect on car invalid as there was no working engine which defeated the object of contract

29
Q

Phillips v Hyland 1987

A

unreasonable exclusion clause of liability to hiree when driver was provided

30
Q

Lally & Weller v George Bird 1980

A

unreasonable exclusion clause to limit liability to £10 per item damaged (removal firm) when some items are worth lots more

31
Q

George Mitchell v Finney Lock Seeds 1982

A

unreasonable to exclude liability for replacement cost of seeds was unreasonable because of expertise & inability to insure against failure of crops