Terms Flashcards

1
Q

Propositions

A

Statements that can be true or false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Arguments

A

Composed of premises and conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Premises

A

Propositions that are supposed to support the conclusion (okay but what does that mean? Why tell me that? What’s the point?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Deductive Arguements

A

Guarantee their conclusions
Mathematical, logical, Arguements from definition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Inductive Arguements

A

Supposed to make their conclusion probable
Analogies, authority, casual inferences, scientific reasoning, extrapolations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Validity

A

If premises are true, then the conclusion must be true
All pigs can fly.
Snowball is a pig.
Therefore, Snowball can fly (not sound but valid)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sound Arguement

A

Valid and has true premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Strength

A

Strong if inductive argument has true premises, then the conclusion is probably true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cogency

A

Cogent Arguements is strong and has true premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Fallacy

A

Type of bad arguement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Formal fallacies

A

Have bad structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Informal Fallacies

A

Problem with their content

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Affirming the consequent

A

If X, then Y
Y
Therefore, X

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Denying the antecedent

A

If X, then Y
not X
therefore, not y

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fallacy fallacy

A

When someone uses the fact that a fallacy was committed to justify rejecting the conclusion of the fallacious argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Begging the question

A

Occurs when one assumes the truth of the conclusion in one or more of the premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Principle of Charity

A

An effort to interpret others’ reasoning in the best possible light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Confirmation Bias

A

Natural tendency to seeks out evidence that supports personal beliefs and to ignore evidence that undermines those beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Cognitive Bias

A

Refers to the systemic ways in which people categorize and make sense of the world to make judgements and decisions

20
Q

Alief

A

Automatic belief-like attitude that can explain how our instinctual responses can conflict with our reasoned-out beliefs (type of cognitive bias)

21
Q

Anchoring

A

Human tendency to stick close to the FIRST piece of information we have a about a new domain

22
Q

Heuristics

A

Rule of thumb, a ready strategy, or a shortcut

23
Q

Representativeness

A

Cognitive bias in which an individual categorizes a new situation based on nearest prototype or representative experience in their mind

24
Q

Availability

A

Cognitive bias in which an individual takes available information while not seeking out or considering unknown information resulting in a person jumping to conclusions

25
Q

Selection Bias

A

When a sample is selected in such a way that it is not representative of the target population

26
Q

Generalization

A

Based on an adequate number of relevant cases

27
Q

Decision Making

A

System 1 is quick, automatic, and emotional
System 2 is deliberate, effortful, and calculating

28
Q

Ad Hominem

A

Fallacy of relevance- committed when one attacks the person making an argument rather than argument itself

29
Q

Genetic Fallacy

A

Fallacy of Relevance, committed when one argues that the origin of an idea is a reason of rejecting (or accepting) that idea

30
Q

Straw Figure Fallacy

A

Fallacy of Relevance, committed when one misrepresents another’s argument then attacks the misrepresented (weaker) argument rather than the actual (stronger) argument

31
Q

Red Herring Fallacy

A

Fallacy of Relevance, committed when one introduces an irrelevant topic

32
Q

Appeal to Authority

A

Committed when one appeals to an unqualified authority in support of one’s claim

33
Q

Appeal to Force Fallacy

A

Committed when one uses a threat to compel agreement with one’s claim

34
Q

Appeal to Popularity Fallacy

A

Committed when one appeals to the popularity of a belief as a reason to affirm its truth

35
Q

Appeal to Consequences Fallacy

A

Committed when one appeals to the bad (or good) consequences of accepting a claim as a reason to reject (or accept) it as true

36
Q

Fallacy of Equivocation

A

Committed when one’s argument mistakenly used the same word in two different sense

37
Q

Appeal to Ignorance Fallacy

A

Fallacy of Weak Induction, Committed when someone reasons from our lack of knowledge that a claim is false (or true) to the assertion the claim is true

38
Q

Slippery Slope

A

Fallacy of Weak Induction, committed when someone argues, without sufficient reason, one event will lead to a series of events ultimately ending in some further event

39
Q

Texas Sharpshooter

A

Fallacy of Weak Induction, committed when one selectively uses, or “cherry-picks”, only the evidence supporting their desired conclusion

40
Q

Post Hoc

A

Fallacy of Weak Induction, committed when someone claims some event causes another just because the first event occurs before the second event
X Occurred before Y
Therefore: X caused Y

41
Q

Hasty Generalization

A

Fallacy of Weak Induction, committed when someone gernalizes too quickly about a group of people, things, or events

42
Q

False Dilemma Fallacy

A

Fallacy of Presumption, committed when one presumes that there are fewer options than there actually are (black and white or dichotomy)

43
Q

Burden of Proof Shifting Fallacy

A

Fallacy of Presumption, committed when one presumes that one’s (implausible) claim is justified unless someone else demonstrates otherwise

44
Q

Conclusion Indicators

A

Therefore, So, It follows that, Hence, Thus, Entails that, We may conclude that, Implies that, Wherefore, As a result

45
Q

Premise Indicators

A

Because, For, Given that, In that, As, Since, As indicated by

46
Q

Conclusions

A

Okay but why would anyone believe that? Give me a reasons or evidence for accepting that claim

47
Q

Valid Structure

A

All X’s do Y
Z is an X
Therefore, Z does Y