Term 2 Lecture 2: Animal Behaviour - Communication Flashcards
Role of communication
Few animals live in isolation. Even solitary species need to find a mating partner, requiring social interaction with another of the same species (conspecific)
Heterospecific interactions are with animals of other species e.g. predator prey.
Heterogeneous (variable) environments lead to competition -> signal+response= communication
Unequal distribution of food,shelter and mates cause aggregation and non-random interactions amongst individuals e.g. defending territory requires directed signals (sound, visual, olfactory) these displays communicate status eliciting a response from the recipient.
Signal + response = communication
Repeated interactions lead to
Evolution of signals that are less costly
Elements of a communication system
Sender (actor) receiver (reactor)
Display - a signal specifically for social purposes “a behavioural display”
Channel - means by which either signal or display is transmitted, may be visual, auditory, olfactory or rarely electrosensory - such as signals used by electric eels
Context- environmental situation, proximity of individuals & wider environmental context e.g. potential for interference from sender to receiver hindering signal transmission e.g. noise in rainforest or colour shifts in the ocean.
Definitions of biological communication
Communication broad def. :
Sharing something between A & B
Early refined def. Wilson 1975:
“ An action on the part of one organism (or cell) that alters the probability pattern or behaviour in another organism (or cell) in a fashion adaptive to one or both participants”
Modern def. Slater 1983: “ the transmission of a signal from one animal to another such that the sender benefits on average from the response of the recipient”
Involuntary ‘communication’ and misinterpretation
E.g. a vole rustling the grass can attract the attention of an owl and get eaten. It did not intend to communicate its location.
So sender must ‘intend to alter another’s behaviour. However it is difficult to discern the intentions of other individuals let alone those of other species. Risk of anthropomorphism - ascribing human characteristics to non-human animals.
- circular arguments - elephants at a waterhole - did they intend to have a drink because they were thirsty? That’s guessing motivation from outcome of behaviour .
Slaters definition of true communication includes deceit and manipulation.
i.e. purpose of display is not so much as to inform the opponent but to persuade the opponent (e.g. in a fight that they are more dominant/bigger/stronger) so displays evolve to maximise persuasive power - not to maximise info. transfer - as in fighting fish dominance displays
Who benefits from communication?
Value of info to sender/ to receiver
Pos/Pos
True communication - both benefit
Pos / Neg or zero
Manipulating (deceit) sender benefits
Neg or zero/ Pos
Eavesdropping (exploitation) benefits receiver
Neg or zero / Neg or zero
Ignoring (spite) benefits neither
Types of signal: discrete/graded
Discrete: digital (all or none/ on or off) e.g. aggressive or not
- in zebras:
hostile - ears flat
friendly: raised ears
Graded: analog (intensity varies in proportion to stimulus strength)
e.g. how aggressive
-in zebras:
Wider mouth more aggressive
Types of signal: Afferential/referential
Afferential: communicates info about the sender itself e.g. robin song warns other males to keep off its territory by advertising it’s strength and fitness
Referential: communicates info about something in the environment, external to the communicating individual. This enables animals to communicate with one another about their surroundings e.g. alarm calls of ground squirrels on spotting a predator
Most species have 20-40 different displays
According to a study of 6 fish species, 10 bird species and 14 mammal species.
There are other ways to combine or utilise these signals to communicate in a more complex way - composite/syntax/context
Combining signals for complex communication: composite/syntax/context and meta communication
Composite signal: 2 or more signals combined to give new meaning e.g. ear position + how open mouth is to show aggression in zebras
Syntax: changing the sequence of displays e.g. A followed by B has a diff meaning to B followed by A
Context: same signal(s) diff meaning(s) depending on context i.e. what other stimuli are received e.g. a lion’s roar -
Male to male - show of strength
To neighbouring pride - keep distance
To own pride - draw individuals together
Meta communication
-communication about communication
- one display changes the meaning of others that follow e.g. play behaviour in dogs and wolves (canids) is indicated by a play bow which indicates the following acts are play - aggressive/sexual displays are used but understood to be play
Message vs. meaning
Message: what signal encodes about sender (what it is, what it is up to and what it might do next) e.g. I’m dominant, stay out of my territory or I will fight you.
Meaning: what receiver construes from the signal - inferred from receivers response varies depending on recipient
Cost & benefit
E.g. male bird sings
Another male bird of same species - understands it must fight or leave
Hawk - hunts bird
A bird of another species - shares territory but doesn’t compete so won’t make any effort
Economy of effort
Signalling may be a less costly way of manipulating behaviour of another individual than using force e.g. male ground crickets dig burrows shaped to amplify their song that they use to attract females - females must risk walking to find the burrows, males are avoiding risk by hiding in their burrows attracting females to them.
However some signals have high cost e.g. red deer stag roaring contests in rutting season, they often do not eat enough to give them more time to roar then in the winter when forage is scarce they are at risk of dying of starvation BUT this is still less costly than having to physically fight each time for mating opportunities - reduced use of energy and avoiding injury.