Teleological Argument Quotes Flashcards

1
Q

Circero on the universe without a designer

A

“how is it consistent with common sense that the universe, which contains all arts and the artificers, can be void of reason and understanding?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Behaye on the universe without a designer

A

“how can one assert that something [with] complexity infinitely beyond our comprehension could have happened without a wise and mighty designer?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Aquinas on the designer directing nature

A

“some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are directed to their end; and this being we call God”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Paley on the analogy between watch and nature

A

“every manifestation of design, which existed in the watch, exists in the works of nature; with the difference, on the side of nature, of being greater and more”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Paley on chance

A

“but never was an organised body of any kind the effect of chance”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Paley on design qua purpose

A

“in no assignable instance hath such a thing [an organised body] existed without intention somewhere”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Paley on design qua regularity

A

“there is a will which restrains and circumscribes the operations of the most extensive”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Paley on combinations of beings

A

“Multitudes of conformations may be conceived capable of existence, which yet do not exist”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Polkinghorne on the multiverse

A

“Bold speculation” and a “metaphysical guess”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hume on there only being one universe

A

“How this argument can have place, where the objects are single [and] without specific resemblance, may be difficult to explain.”

(Against TA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hume on the lack of empirical evidence

A

“A very small part of this great system is very imperfectly discovered to us; and do we thence pronounce decisively concerning the origin of the whole?”

(Against TA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hume on the evidential problem of evil

A

“I allow, that the bad appearances may be compatible with such attributes as you suppose: But surely they can never prove these attributes”

(Against TA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hume on the singularity of the deity

A

“A great number of men join in building a house or ship; why may not several deities combine in contriving and framing a world?”

(Against TA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Hume on God being human-like

A

“EPICURUS maintained, that no man has ever seen reason but in a human figure; therefore the gods must have a human figure.”

(Against TA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Russell on teleological argument

A

“It is a most astonishing thing that people can believe that this world, with all its defects, should be the best that omnipotence and omniscience has been able to produce in millions of years.”

(Against TA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

J.S. Mill on the designer

A

“Anything in nature that points to beneficent design proves that this beneficence is accompanied only by limited power”

(Against TA)

17
Q

Kant on knowing noumena

A

“The attainment of absolute totality is completely impossible on the path of empiricism.”

(Against TA)

18
Q

Darwin on the design argument

A

“The old argument from design in nature fails now that the law of natural selection has been discovered.”

(Against TA)