Tectonic processes and hazards (EQ 2) Flashcards

1
Q

Natural disaster definition

A

A natural hazard which has caused significant damage to a community or society, and they are no longer able to cope using their own resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Risk

A

The probability or potential of a natural event to cause harm and damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Resilience

A

The capacity of a community, individual or nation to cope with the impacts of a natural hazard.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the PAR model?

A

A theoretical framework for the vulnerability of places to natural disasters.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the 3 things that contribute to a disaster (PAR model)

A

Root causes - Limited access to power, structures and resources. Also poor political/economic systems

Dynamic pressures - Lack of investment, training and other factors such as rapid urbanisation and population change

Unsafe conditions - Physical environment, local economy, public actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Give 2 root causes, dynamic pressures and unsafe conditions in Haiti 2010

A

Root causes - GDP per capita is 1200 USD, 50% of the population is under 20

Dynamic pressures - Lack of education and training, rapid urbanisation and population growth

Unsafe conditions - 80% of housing in Port Au Prince is informal slums, 25% of people live in extreme poverty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How do geological factors affect vulnerability and resilience?

A

Degree of urbanisation - More urbanisation, higher potential risk
Isolation and accessibility - Isolated areas have less potential life losses but are more at risk during recovery and rescue due to accessibility problems
Population density - Potential for death, injury and damage is greater.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does governance affect vulnerability and resilience?

A
  • Poor governance leads to a lack of investment and planning for natural hazards
  • Haiti government had very little control over land ownership or housing regulations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does development affect vulnerability and resiliance?

A

Education - educated population allows for more effective planning and management, less deaths and an increase in the capacity to cope
Housing - Resilient housing infrastructure may create more resilient people + decrease vulnerability
Healthcare - Better healthcare will increase chances of survival and treatment of those impacted
GDP - wealth provides all of the above

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Moment Magnitude Scale (MMS)

A

Measures energy released by an earthquake
Logarithmic scale
Related to the amount of slip on the fault line

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Mercalli Scale

A

Measures impacts seen and felt from the earthquakes
Measures the intensity of the shaking effects, not the energy released
Scale of I -XII

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Volcanic explosivity index

A

Composite index combining eruption height, volume of material erupted and the duration
Scale of 0-8 but can go up to 9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the six factors on a hazard profile

A

Magnitude
Speed of onset
Duration
Areal extent
Spatial predictability
Frequency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why do we have hazard profiles?

A

To map out and compare the characteristics of hazard events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What 3 types of hazard with the following characteristics present the highest risk?

A
  • High magnitude, low frequency events
  • Rapid onset events with low spatial predictability, occur in numerous places and without warning
  • Regional areal extent, can affect large numbers of people in a wide range of locations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Problems of hazard profiles

A
  • Unpredictability of hazards makes these models less effective at accurately representing human responses to hazards
  • Time frame is not presented very well
  • Quite vague in treating every hazard the same way
17
Q

Human, Economic and Environmental impacts from Tohoku, Japan EQ and tsunami

A
  • 16,000 deaths
  • 6,000 injuries
  • 130,000 displaced
  • USD 235bn cost
  • Industrial production prevention
  • 40m wave tsunami
  • Liquefaction
  • Coastal subsidence of 0.6 meters
18
Q

Human, Economic and Environmental impacts from Eruption of Eyjafjallajökull, Iceland

A
  • 500 local families displaced
  • Roads impassable
  • Water supply contaminated
  • £130m lost per day for airline companies
  • £5m lost per day for tourism
  • Major jokhulhaulp
  • Ash dissolved in Atlantic ocean, causing plankton boom
19
Q

Human, Economic and Environmental impacts from the earthquake in Sichuan, China

A
  • 69,000 deaths
  • 5 million made homeless
  • 370,000 injured
  • £140bn in losses
  • £75m repair in communications infrastructure
  • Fire and gas leaks were common
  • Water pollution
20
Q

Human, Economic and Environmental impacts from Eruption of Mt Pinatubo, Phillipenes

A
  • 850 deaths
  • 1.2m made homeless
  • 58,000 evacuated
  • Bridges and transport infrastructure destroyed
  • 650,000 jobs lost
  • Volcanic ash destroyed soil fertility
  • Fast flowing lahars
  • Global cooling
21
Q

Human, Economic and Environmental impacts from the Asian 2004 tsunami and earthquake

A
  • 280,000 deaths
  • Outbreak of cholera
  • Limited food supply
  • £9.4bn damage
  • Sri Lankan fishing industry destroyed
  • Tourism collapsed
  • Pollution and debris hazards
  • Smaller islands completely destroyed
22
Q

Human, Economic and Environmental impacts from the Haiti 2010 earthquake

A
  • Over 220,000 deaths
  • 300,000 injuries
  • Further 30% in poverty
  • £8.5bn in damage
  • One third of commercial buildings collapsed
  • Water pollution and cholera outbreak
  • Rubble and debris remained on the landscape for months
23
Q

Vulnerability factors for the Tohoku, Japan earthquake (inequality, governance, geographical factors)

A
  • 0.910 HDI, very well developed nation with a good education system
  • Well prepared, good planning and preparation
  • Epicentre 70km off the coast, 1 minute Tokyo warning signal
24
Q

Vulnerability factors for the Eyjafjallajökull, Iceland eruption (inequality, governance, geographical factors)

A
  • Highly developed nation, sparsely populated, high incomes per capita
  • Very well rehearsed planning and preparation. Stable political landscape
  • Lies on mid-Atlantic ridge and a large magma plume, used to tectonic events so the population is well rehearsed on evacuation procedures etc. making them less vulnerable.
25
Vulnerability factors for the Sichuan, China earthquake (inequality, governance, geographical factors)
- Poverty stricken area, school buildings of poor quality - Poor corrupt governance in the planning and building regulations but the response was quick and effective and used traditional methods and voluntarism. - Shallow, strong earthquake ab out 120km from the Sichuan province
26
Vulnerability factors for the Mt Pinatubo, Philippines eruption (inequality, governance, geographical factors)
- Stark inequality, high poverty levels, weak education. health problems were wide ranging. - Underprepared and reliant on international responses - On the Eurasian and Philippine plate, so eruptions are fairly frequent, but not of this scale. - Triggered lahars as heavy rainfall remobilised the volcanic debris in the following years.
27
Vulnerability factors for the Indian ocean tsunami and earthquake (inequality, governance, geographical factors)
- High state of vulnerability in the surrounding nations with a lack of preparedness and education - Technology of the nations is weak - Very destructive fault line. However there was an inadequate warning due to lack of EWS's
28
Vulnerability factors for the Haiti, 2010 earthquake (inequality, governance, geographical factors)
-50% in poverty before the quake and infrastructure is of very poor quality and lots of slums on slopes due to geographical factors - Historic debt problems, government legislation weak - No warning systems, epicentre 25km away from Port-au-Prince. Very shallow earthquake
29
Natural Hazard definition
A natural event with the potential to harm people or property.