Tectonic hazards case studies Flashcards

1
Q

key impacts of Haiti earthquake

A
  • 217,000 dead
  • 300,000 injured
  • one million homeless
  • 3 million effected
  • US$8 billion damage
  • 1994
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

dates/duration of haiti earthquake

A
  • 12th Jan 2010
  • 4:53 pm
  • less than 30 secs, 7.0 magnitude
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

plates involved in Haiti earthquake

A
  • north American plate to the north and Caribbean plate to the south
  • conservative boundary where Caribbean plate moved eastwards
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

key details of haiti earthquake

A
  • magnitude 7.0
  • epicentre = port au prince
  • 52 aftershocks all measuring over 4.5
  • focus 13km below service
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

secondary effects of Haiti earthquake

A

Environmental:
- liquefaction (in Port-au-Prince due to flatlands made of loose sedimentary material) and landslides
- 19 million cubic metres of rubble/debris in Port au Prince, 40-50% of buildings fell in Port-au-Prince – debris, secondary hazards such as landslides: over 30,000

Social:217,000 died, one million homeless, 250,000 residences damaged, 80% of schools in Port-au-Prince and **60% **in South damaged/destroyed, longer term: November 2010 outbreaks of cholera: nearly 6,000 died and over 200,000 infected

Economic: $7.8 billion damage: 120% of Haiti’s GDP at the time, the port was damaged beyond repair: impacting future trade

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

short term responses to haiti earthquake

A
  • Aid was slow to arrive, due to damage to the port
  • USA sent rescue teams and 10,000 troops, as well as $100 million in aid
  • 115,000 tents set up and 1 million tarpaulin shelters provided
  • Bottled water and purification tablets were provided
  • 235,000 people were moved away from Port-au-Prince to less damaged cities
  • £20 million donated by the UK government
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

long term responses to haiti earthquake

A
  • Response was slow, but new homes were built to a higher standard, however over one million still lived in temporary shelters one year after the earthquake
  • World Bank waived the countries debt repayments for 5 years
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

why were impacts of haiti earthquake so bad?

A
  • Shallow depth: seismic waves must travel a smaller distance through the Earth to reach the surface to maintain more energy.
  • Struck most densely populated area : - 3 million live in Port au Prince: most in slums after rapid urbanisation
  • Poorest country in western hemisphere
  • Buildings in Port-Au-Prince poor condition/not designed to earthquake resistant
  • Only one airport with one runway and port unusable due to damage: limit aid
  • Rescue teams from around the world took 48hrs to arrive due to problems at airport
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

dates/duration of Tohoku earthquake/tsunami, Japan

A
  • 11th March 2011
  • 2:46 pm
  • magnitude 9.0
  • epth of 20 miles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

plates involved in Tohoku earthquake

A
  • destructive
  • pacific and north american
  • shallow focus, ocean floor shunted vertically about 10m
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

key stats about Tohoku earthquake

A
  • 16,000 died
  • 26,000 injured
  • 460,000 homeless
  • $360 billion damage
  • 1923: last major earthquake
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

effects of Tohoku earthquake/tsunami

A

Environmental:
- Landfall: more than 50cm in some beachfront areas
- 25 million tonnes of debris
- shifted earths axis by 10cm
- japans northern coastline moved 2.4m east decreasing effectiveness of tsunami defences
- fires

Social:
- 20,000 dead, 1 million buildings destroyed, 4.4 million households no electricity, 1.5 million no running water
- levels of radiation 8x higher as 7 reactors at Fukushima power station melted down from tsunami
- Secondary (from tsunami):
- 30km around fukishma was evacuated, lack of food/housing where evacuees sent
- Waves up to 40m high: led to damage/pollution up to 6 miles inland

Economic:
- $360 billion by only 6% of GDP
-*costliest natural disaster in the world**
- fishing industry lost $11.3 billion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

short term responses to tohuku earthquake

A
  • Japan Meteorological Agency issued tsunami warnings three minutes after the earthquake.
  • Scientists had been able to predict where the tsunami would hit after the earthquake using modelling and forecasting technology so that responses could be directed to the appropriate areas.
  • 100,000 rescue workers dispatched within hours of tsunami
  • government declared a 20 km evacuation zone around the Fukushima nuclear power plant to reduce the threat of radiation exposure to local residents
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

long term responses to Tohoku earthquake

A
  • April 2011 (one month after), central gov established Reconstruction Policy Council to develop national recovery/reconstruction outlook for tsunami-resilient communities
  • Japanese gov approved £190 billion budget spent over 10 years
  • Gov coastal protection policy: seawalls/breakwaters ensure performance of a potential tsunami level of up to approx 150 year recurrence interval
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why were impacts of tohoku earthquake/tsunami so bad

A
  • Only 45 miles of the coast of Tohoku
  • tsunami warnings in coastal areas only followed by 58% who headed for higher ground and the wave hit 49% who did not follow
  • sea defences were totally inadequate as nobody expected a 10m tsunami
  • Rural areas isolated as Tohoku expressway was damaged
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

preparation in Japan for tohoku earthquake

A
  • nowhere in the world is better equipped for earthquakes
  • like resistant infrastructure that swayed rather than collapsed (tokyo)
  • warnings sent out of national tv, radio
  • gave time to people who lived on the coast to evacuate
  • lots of education in schools
  • had lots of time to seek higher ground
  • 7.2 quake on 7th march allowed japan meteorlogical agency to send out warnings
  • extensive monitoring (as much as there could be)

BUT
- tsunami warnings in coastal areas only followed by 58% who headed for higher ground and the wave hit 49% who did not follow
- sea defences were totally inadequate as nobody expected a 10m tsunami