TD test Flashcards
Smith advocates increasing customs taxes
False, Adam Smith was an advocate for free trade and argued against protectionism, including the use of customs taxes, which he believed would hinder economic growth and lead to higher prices for consumers.
Smith believes that a country’s growth can only come from government intervention
False, Adam Smith believed in the power of free markets and competition to drive economic growth, and he argued that government should play a limited role in the economy.
According to Smith, the division of labor is a factor in growth
True. According to Adam Smith, the division of labor is a key factor in economic growth and increased productivity. He argued that by dividing the production process into smaller, more specialized tasks, workers could become more efficient and productive, leading to higher levels of output and economic growth.
According to Smith, the pursuit of individual interest leads to the general interest
True. Smith believed that the pursuit of individual self-interest would lead to greater efficiency, innovation, and competition in the economy, which would benefit everyone.
According to Smith, the division of labor can be applied at the international level
True. Smith argued that the international division of labor was similar to the division of labor within a country and that it could lead to greater specialization, innovation, and competition in the global economy.
According to Ricardo’s theory, countries should specialize in producing the good for which they have a comparative advantage. This means that…countries should specialize in those productions where they are most efficient compared to other countries
True, as countries should specialize in producing the goods in which they are most efficient compared to other countries, meaning that they can produce those goods at a lower opportunity cost than other countries.
According to Ricardo’s theory, countries should specialize in producing the good for which they have a comparative advantage. This means that countries should specialize in those productions in which they are the most efficient or the least badly compared to other countries
False, as a country’s comparative advantage is not based on being the most efficient or the least badly compared to other countries, but rather on the concept of opportunity cost.
According to Ricardo’s theory, countries should specialize in producing the good for which they have a comparative advantage. This means that countries need to protect their infant industries
False, as Ricardo argued against protectionism and for free trade.
According to HOS trade theory, international trade specialization depends on
the relative factor endowments of each country
International trade in the HOS model is considered
a perfect substitute to the exchange of factors of production between countries
The Stolper-Samuelson theorem establishes that the increase in the relative price of a good
increases the real returns to the factor more intensely used in its production and reduces the returns to the other factor
In 1953, Russian economist Wassily Leontief demonstrated that
US exports were more labor intensive and less capital intensive than US imports
How can we describe factor endowments?
Endowments of factors such as labor and capital. Trade in the HOS model can be explained through the initial endowments available to each country:
Labor rich countries should therefore specialize in labor-intensive productions while capital rich countries in capital-intensive productions.
Discuss the Leontief paradox. What are the implications for the HOS model?
Despite the United States being capital abundant, Leontief demonstrated that US exports were more labor than capital intensive compared to US imports. This contradictory finding was also made for several other developed nations. This finding largely undermines the HOS theory and plays in favor more Ricardian model where technological differences can better explain comparative advantage.
T/F: Ricardo’s principle of comparative advantage states that the attractiveness of trade is clear when compared to prices under autarky. HOS contradicts this statement by arguing that the motive for trade springs from differences in factor endowments between countries. Explain.
False. Differences in factor endowments do not contradict the Ricardian model, which explains comparative advantage from the perspective of differences in productivity. Rather it adds an additional layer. In HOS, different factor endowments explain how prices shift from autarky to free trade, providing an argument in favor of trade.
T/F: Country A has 200 units of capital and 250 units of labor, while country B has 100 units of capital and 100 units of labor. Capital-rich country A has an incentive to export vehicles, which are capital intensive, and to import textiles which are labor intensive. However, country B has no incentive to trade with country A because it has an equal measure of capital and labor. Explain.
False. What matters are relative and not absolute endowments in factors of production. Country B is relatively rich in capital compared to country A. As a result country A is relatively rich in labor. If we assume similar technologies and consumer behavior then country B has an interest in importing textiles, while country A has an interest in importing vehicles.
According to Rybczynski’s theorem, the growth of a factor of production involves
an increase in the production of the good intensive in this factor and a decrease in the production of the other good
The increase in one of the factors of production (i.e. capital) of a good will have what effect on the production of this good according to Rybczynski’s theorem?
Increase
Rybczynski’s theorem considers that immigration will lead to lower wages.
False
We speak of a factor price amplification effect when
Changes to factor prices alters the price of goods
Explain how trade can actually increase poverty, in the form of “Immiserizing growth” as discussed by Indian economist Jagdish Bhagwati
International trade based on the specialization of nations can lead to impoverishing growth for some nations.
Indeed, when a country has a comparative advantage in a good, it will be able to increase the production and exports of this good, this can lead to a fall in the price of the exported good if the supply of the good is greater than its demand.
- Excess supply: the firm are obliged to sell the good at a low price
- Rising production leads to a deterioration in the terms of trade, which translates into a loss of income.
- When this loss of income is not offset by higher sales, the country becomes poorer while producing more.
Describe the concept of “Dutch disease” in economics, what is its origin?
The “Dutch disease” affects certain oil producing countries. This paradox leads to too much specialization of activities in countries rich in natural resources (due to low production costs), which creates a dependence of these countries on these activities.
Thus, the economy of these countries risks being severely weakened in the face of an economic shock affecting these activities.
Dutch disease has its origins in the crisis in the Netherlands in the 1960s following the discovery of a natural gas deposit in the North Sea.
-the abundance of energy resources - a trade surplus - an appreciation of the exchange rate - a drop in exports.
The new theories of international trade respond to the observation that:
- there is a gap between trade theory and the reality of international trade
- protectionism can in some cases be beneficial for a country, especially to stimulate local production
- A large part of international trade takes place between developed countries with very similar factor endowments
Among the explanatory factors of intra-industry trade are:
- market structure
- research and development
- economies of scale