Tax Administration Flashcards
What are the features of “tax” as established in the Nyambirai v National Social Security Authority?
- Its a compulsory and not optional contribution
- imposed by the legislature or other competent public authority
- upon the public as a whole or a substantial sector thereof
- the revenue from which is to be utilized for the public benefit and to provide a service in the public interest
What does section 228 and 229 of the Constitution do?
Section 228: empowers a province to impose taxes. levies and duties
Section 229: empowers municipalities to impose rates on property, surcharges on fees for services provided by or on behalf of municipality etc.
When will a bill be a money bill? make reference to section 77(1) of the Constitution
a. When it appropriates money
b. imposes national taxes, levies, duties or surcharges
c. abolishes or reduces or grants exemptions from any national taxes, levies, duties or surcharges
d. authorizes direct charges against the NRF
What happened in SA Reserve Bank v Shuttleworth?
This case dealt with exchange control and a exit charge that had to be paid by Shuttleworth if he wanted to leave the country. 10% of his capital had to be paid.
Shuttleworth’s legal team then said that this charge was actually a tax which was imposed unlawfully as it didn’t follow the correct implementation procedure. They said it was a tax because the state was generating revenue for itself.
The state argued that it was a regulatory charge to control conduct: that conduct being to prevent people from taking out their capital and moving to another country
Court:
1. Firstly emphasis the importance of tax and the right the government has to take tax.
2. Says that if the revenue that is raised is aimed at regulating conduct = its a charge or a levy. If the revenue that is generated is solely to raise revenue for the state = tax.
3. You have to look at the dominant intention of the statue from which the revenue arises. If the dominant purpose is to raise revenue then its a tax and its subject to the procedure set out in section 77 of the Constitution if its not a tx, its not subject to section 77.
Factors listed in Shuttleworth:
1. Money paid into general revenue fund for general purposes (indictive of it being a tax)
2. No specific service in return for payment (tax)
3. Purpose is to punish (not tax)
4. Subject to country’s general machineries of assessment and collection (E.g if SARS is involved) - tax
5. Words used (e.g “fee”) - not tax
6. Not imposed on public as a whole or on substantial part - not tax
7. Charge used to defray administrative costs (not for public benefit) - not tax
8. Purpose to ensure constant stream of revenue for state - tax
Outcome:
Court found the exit charge to be charge because the purpose was to regulate conduct therefore the fact that the money bill process was not followed was irrelevant
What happened in Casino Association of South Africa v Member of the Executive Council for Economic Development?
MEC imposed a gaming levy in terms of the North West Gambling Act via amending a regulation. Problem: Did the Minister have the power to charge a gaming levy?
Applicant: dominant purpose is to raise revenue therefore its a tax
MEC: Not a tax, but a regulatory measure
Court:
1. Refers to Shuttleworth: look at dominant purpose of the Act, statue, regulation etc.
2. This court goes on to add another tool: look to see if there is a link between the dominant purpose of the statute and the purpose of the charge itself
Outcome:
1. Court confirmed that the dominant purpose of the Gambling Act and the Regulation was to regulate gambling in the province
2. However, even though the NW Gambling Act was regulatory in nature, the court concluded that the funds collected through the levy was paid into the provincial revenue fund where it was used for general purposes which enabled the province to deliver services
Therefore, on this basis the court found that even though the Act was regulatory - the gambling levy was a tax and invalidly imposed because it did not comply with section 228 of the Constitution.
Is Tax a deprivation of property?
No. In First National Bank of SA v C:SARS and other additional case law it was confirmed and stated that “Tax is not a deprivation of property, nor is it expropriation”
What rule does Section 164 of the TAA refer to and is it constitutional?
Section 164 of the TAA refers to the “Pay now, argue later” rule. Which basically just means that if the tax payer objects to an assessment they still have to pay the sum of money that SARS alleges they have to pay. If SARS is wrong, they will pay you back with interest.
This rule basically is there to ensure that the tax payer does not use the dispute of an assessment as a delay tactic to buy more time to pay and its constitutionality was challenged in the CC but it was ultimately held not to be unconstitutional as it does not limit your access to court or preclude you from approaching a court.
What are the main classification of taxes and give an example of each
- Income (e.g income tax)
- Consumption - the taxation of goods and services (e.g VAT)
- Wealth - the taxation of property or capital (e.g capital gains tax)
What is the difference between a proportional vs progressive rate?
Proportional:
this basically means that there is a flat rate that is charged across the board (e.g corporate income tax rate of 27%)
However the argument is that the effect of a flat rate from the outside seems to achieve equality as it applies to everyone equally for example 15% VAT. However in reality this flat rate would have a greater impact on low income individuals which means equality is not actually being achieved.
Progressive:
Tax increases as your income increases
What is the difference between direct and indirect taxes and provide an example of each
Direct: taxes that are levied on a person (e.g personal income tax)
Indirect: taxes that are imposed on transactions (e.g VAT)
What is the role of taxation?
- Revenue - to finance government activities
- Redistribution of resources
- Economic growth
- Reprising - when the government tries to encourage or discourage certain behavior by using certain taxes
Explain and discuss Adam Smith’s criteria for a good tax system
- Equality:
Equality both horizontally and vertically. Tax burden should be distributed fairly and equally and should be associated with your ability to pay.
Horizontal - if we are in the same position we should be treated the same.
Vertical - In different circumstances we should be treated differently - Certainty:
Rules must be clear and certain and decisions should not be made arbitrarily - Convenience:
Make it easy to interact with authorities - file tax returns get refunds etc - Cost-effective and economically efficient:
As a T.P your compliance cost must be considered - how much does it cost to make sure your tax is in order/ compliant with legislation. However, Adam Smith says you shouldn’t make business decisions based on the tax consequences of those decisions - Flexibility:
Tax system should be flexible (technological advancements) - Simplicity:
In an ideal world, you should be able to understand the tax system
What was said in the Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni?
- The court emphasized the importance of interpretation of statutes when it comes to tax law.
- Said don’t just look at dominant impression (shuttleworth) but also give importance to context, language, purpose and the material used known to those responsible for its production
- if more than one meaning can be construed then weigh up considering factors and choose most sensible meaning
What are the important factors re interpretation mentioned in Minister of Police v Fidelity Security Services?
- Words should be given its ordinary grammatical meaning unless to do so would result in absurdity
- The statute must be interpreted purposively, properly contextualized and consistently construed with the Constitution to preserve its constitutional validity
- In the case of ambiguity, interpret the statue to mean something constitutionally valid but be careful not to overstep
- Statute should be interpreted to avoid a gap in the legislative scheme
What happened in the Diago SA Ltd v Commissioner of SARS?
The vanilla case. A specific tariff could be applied if you used non-alcoholic ingredients to add to alcoholic ingredients.
Vanilla has alcohol in it therefore this specific tariff couldn’t be applied.