Takings Clause Flashcards
Takings Clause
a check on the power of eminent domain (the power of the gov’t to take private property for public purposes)
Property Interest
for a person to challenge a gov’t action as an unconstitutional taking, the person must have a property interest.
Types of Property
includes real property, tangible personal property, and intangible property
Types of Interest
includes fee simple, easement, leasehold, lien, and the rights of a property owner (e.g., the right to control access to the property)
Types of Takings: Seizure of Property
primary challenge of the seizure is whether the owner has received just compensation
private prop. –> private party: rationally related to a conceivable purpose
Types of Takings: Damage to or Destruction of Property
exception: gov’t destruction or private property in response to a public peril does not trigger the right to compensation
Types of Takings: Regulatory Taking
Generally, a regulation that adversely affects a person’s property interest is not a taking, but it is possible for a regulation to rise to the level of a taking
Types of Takings: Recharacterization of Property
The Takings Clause prevents a government from re-characterizing private property as public property.
In determining whether a regulation creates a taking, the following factors are considered:
- the economic impact of the regulation on the property owner
- the extent to which the regulation interfere’s with the owner’s reasonable, investment-backed expectations regarding the use of property and
- the character of the regulation, including the degree to which it will benefit society, how the regulation distributes the burdens and benefits among property owners, and whether the regulation violates any of the owner’s essential attributes of property ownership, such as the right to exclude others from the property.
Regulatory Taking: Per Say Takings
- gov’t regulation results in a permanent physical occupation of the property by the gov’t or a third party , regardless of the public interest it may serve
- regulation results in a permanent total loss of the property’s economic value
Types of Takings: Exaction of Promises from Developer
A local government may exact promises from a developer, such as setting aside a portion of the land being developed for a park in exchange for issuing the necessary construction permits. Such exactions do not violate the Takings Clause if there is:
-an essential nexus between the legitimate state interests and the conditions imposed on the property owner; and
-a rough proportionality between the burden imposed on the property owner and the impact of the proposed development
Just Compensation
fair market value at the time of the taking; measured in terms of the loss to the owner, not the benefit to the gov’t