T4 Social Cultural Flashcards
Thatcher’s views on Society
- ‘There is no such thing as society; there are individual men and women, and their families.’
- Margaret Thatcher came from a different background to her predecessors like Macmillan and
Heath. She had a very different idea about what Conservatism should be about. - Thatcher was the daughter of a grocer and so from a lower middle-class background.
- Her beliefs were really centred around the Victorian ideals of the Church of England and the
Protestant work-ethic. - Individuals should be responsible for themselves and their families, the government should be
limited in its access into people’s lives, but the law should be strict and punishments for those
who break it should be harsh. - There was also a greater move towards British nationalism under Thatcher which had been absent
from ‘One-Nation’ Conservatism. - Thatcher & Thatcherites rejected the post-war consensus and embraced the New Right
economics.
Thatcherism’s Impact on Society (1979 - 1987)
- There is debate about the extent to which Thatcher’s government drove the process of economic
realignment from a manufacturing/industrial base towards service industries – decline was
already apparent pre-Thatcher. - In areas which were heavily dependent on mining, shipbuilding or heavy industry, the process was
particularly painful. - Working class communities crumbled in the North, Midlands, Scotland and South Wales,
exacerbating the North/South divide. - Economic activity seemed to be moving towards London and the south.
The 1981 and 1985 Riots
- In 1981 Howe advised Thatcher that cities such as Liverpool could be left to ‘managed decline’.
- In 1981 there were a series of riots between April and July in Brixton, London, Handsworth,
Birmingham, Toxteth, Liverpool; and Chapeltown, Leeds. - The Scarman Report was commissioned to examine the causes of the 1981 riots.
- It identified poverty and race as the key components.
- The areas when riots happened were suffering high levels of unemployment and deprivation.
- This was exacerbated by the fact that these were also areas where young black and Asian people
felt the ‘sus law’ meant that the police unfairly targeted them. - Despite the Scarman Report, and subsequent changes in policing policies, there were further riots
in 1985. - The economic realignment caused by deindustrialisation did, however, also lead to investment
and regeneration in some of these areas. - Michael Heseltine, argued for greater government intervention in derelict inner cities,
spearheaded a redevelopment project in the dockland’s areas of both London and Liverpool. - In London, the Canary Wharf development on the old West India Docks, became the second most
important financial district in the country.
‘The Right to Buy’
- The sale of council houses known as ‘Right to Buy’ was popular: over a million council houses were
sold in the 1980s. - In all 1.75m homes were sold raising £18 billion for the government
The Right to Buy Scheme
- The Right to Buy scheme extended Thatcher’s privatisation policies and the ‘rolling back of the
frontiers of the state’ towards social housing. - Thatcher’s government thought that home ownership increased people’s sense of citizenship and
social responsibility. - By contrast, council houses encouraged a culture of dependency on the state.
- In addition, to these philosophical considerations, there was a tactical one: homeowners tended
to vote Conservative and tenants Labour. - Increasing the number of homeowners was likely to increase the number of Conservative voters.
The 1980 Housing Act
- A key aim of the Thatcher government was to turn Britain into a ‘property-owning democracy’.
- The Housing Act of 1980 gave tenants the right to buy their council house.
- They received a discount between 33% and 50% depending on how long they had lived in the house.
- By 1988, approximately two million new homeowners had taken advantage of the scheme to buy the homes they had previously rented.
- It became a symbol of the success of Thatcherism.
- The Labour Party initially opposed the Right to Buy scheme but later dropped its opposition
because it was so popular with the public, particularly in the south of the country.
Consequences of the Right to Buy
- On the other hand, Right to Buy did have negative consequences.
- The sale of council housing was predominately in better-off areas and did not have great impact
in less desirable estates. - Councils were ordered to use the profits from the sale of council houses to reduce their debts,
not to build new council houses. - The number and quality of homes available for rent was sharply reduced and waiting lists for
rented homes go longer. - Many people were housed in emergency B&B accommodation which was expensive for councils
to provide and not always suitable for the families involved.
Right to Buy was Fair
*People ought to be able to buy their own home. *Allowing people to get on in life and improve
their circumstances shows that hard work brings
tangible results.
*Tenants had paid rent for years: now they could
convert this into home ownership.
*Wider home ownership leads to a more stable
society.
Right to Buy was Unfair
*Social housing exists to help people who cannot
afford to buy and who find commercial rents
leave them poor. Selling council houses left
fewer properties for those on low incomes.
*Council tenants do not have a special right to
buy a house. If they are rich enough to buy one,
they should do so like everyone else on the open
market.
*Reduced numbers of council houses and flats
leaves more people homeless, which is bad for
social stability.
*If council tenants can buy the places where they
live, why can’t tenants of private landlords be
given the right to buy theirs – with a subsidy to
help them do it?
Early 1980s Industrial Disputes
- Thatcher’s economic policies naturally aroused hostility from a number of trade unions
representing public sector workers. - These included NUPE (National Union of Public Employees) and COHSE (Confederation of Health
Service Employees). - Nurses, ambulance workers, teacher, steelworkers, as well as, miners and print workers all went
on strike during the 1980s. - Much of the time it was over pay disputes, especially during the 1980s when inflation was still
running high. - Some of these pay disputes, especially involving NHS workers, enjoyed high levels of public
support and the government did sometimes agree to their demands.
The 1984 - 1985 Miners Strike
- In her memoirs, Thatcher wrote that she had beaten democratic socialism through the ballot box:
‘undemocratic socialism… would need to be beaten. I had never had any doubt about the true aim
of the hard Left: they were revolutionaries who sought to impose a Marxist system on Britain
whatever the means and the cost’. - This ‘undemocratic socialism’ was her way of referring to the political power of the trade unions.
- Much of the driving force in her policies towards the trade unions was the issue of governability.
- Following the defeats of both the Heath and Callaghan governments, the question was whether
the trade unions were powerful enough to prevent governments putting laws through parliament,
and the police and judiciary enforcing them.
The 1980 Employment Act
Secretary of State for Employment James Prior steered though the Employment Act of 1980. This
outlawed Secondary Picketing, such a feature of the 1970s, and took steps to limit the Closed Shop.
The 1982 Employment Act
Prior’s successor, Norman Tebbit took further steps with the Employment Act of 1982 to put employers
in a stronger bargaining position.
The 1982 Employment Act:
- Made it harder to sack someone for not being a trade union member.
- Made it illegal for companies to agree a contract only with another company whose workforce
were all union members. - Made it possible to sue trade unions, as well as, individual trade union officials, where they
engaged in an illegal strike. - Narrowed the concept and definition of a legal strike.
- Gave employers the right to fire workers who were on strike.
Thatcher’s Enemy Within Speech (1984)
- Speaking at a private meeting of the 1922 Committee of Conservative backbench MPs at
Westminster, Thatcher compared taking on the miners to the Falklands War. - ‘We had to fight the enemy without in the Falklands. We always have to be aware of the enemy
within, which is much more difficult to fight and more dangerous to liberty.’
Arthur Scargill
- Thatcher was very fortunate in her enemy.
- The National Union of Miners (NUM) leader was Arthur Scargill who was unwilling to compromise.
He was fiercely driven by his socialist ideology and was an avowed Marxist (communist). - In some ways, although very charismatic, he was a gift for the Conservatives and the right-wing
pro-Conservative newspaper press.
The 1984 – 1985 Miners Strike - Causes
- The Conservatives government wanted to close hundreds of uneconomic pits.
- Trade unions had a stranglehold over the country for the last few decades.
- The government passed the Employment Acts. These said unions had to have a national ballot
and secondary picketing was outlawed. - Thatcher wanted to take on the miners and bitterly remembered how they destroyed the Heath
government. Both the Miners and the Conservatives wanted a fight. - The leader of the National Union of Miners (NUM), Arthur Scargill was unwilling to compromise.
- The newly appointed leader of the National Coal Board (NCB), Ian MacGregor, was also unwilling
to compromise with the NUM. - Thatcher had just won the 1983 General Election.
- She felt emboldened and empowered. Her cabinet was even ‘drier’ than before.
- Francis Pym was sacked and replaced by Geoffrey Howe as Foreign Secretary.
- Nigel Lawson took over as chancellor of the exchequer. Encouraged by the success in the Falklands
War, the government committed (in the prime minister’s own words from a 1984 speech she gave
Conservative backbenchers) to defeating the ‘enemy within’ having won against the ‘enemy
without’. - The Thatcher government made clear that the size of the coal industry would be reduced;
uneconomic collieries would close, miners would be made redundant. - The National Union of Miners [N.U.M] were determined to prevent the coal industry from
contracting and miners losing their jobs. - The union balloted [voted] on strike action on three occasions in 1982 – 1983 and each occasion
there was a strong majority against strike action. - To avoid a fourth defeat, NUM President Arthur Scargill, allowed a local dispute to lead to a strike
by the Yorkshire Area of the union. - Other areas called strikes individually. Some areas opposed strike action, but when pickets arrived
from other areas, union members refused to cross the picket lines. - The Miners’ strike therefore started with a national mandate [vote] by members of the NUM
democratically authorising the strike.
The 1984 – 1985 Miners Strike – Events
- Scargill launched the strike in the spring not the winter (he did not hold a national ballot).
- Coal was stockpiled by the Conservative government before the strike began and used when
needed. - Flying Pickets were a tactic employed by the strikers.
- They would travel from mine to mine and try to blockade the mine.
- Secondary Picketing of a location not directly involved in a dispute was another tactic used by the
miners. - Frequently, fights would break out between picketing miners and the police.
- Police were drafted in from all over the country-the Met Police has a particularly fierce reputation
and were hated by the miners. - The police were drafted into strike areas with military precision.
- There has been criticism that they invaded civil liberties. Miners were prevented from travelling
to certain areas. - The Battle of Orgreave between the NUM strikers and police was the location of some of the most
heated battles between police and the miners.
The 1984 – 1985 Miners Strike - Consequences
- When the Miners’ Strike ended in March 1985, the miners returned to work having not achieved
their aims. - The result had weakened the position of the trade union movement in the country’s economy,
society, and politics. - Coal Pits were closed, miners were laid off and the NUM quickly lost half of its membership.
- By the end of February 1985 more and more miners were returning to work.
- Trade unions became a lots less powerful and played less of a role in the economic life of the
country. - Hundred of mines were closed. Some would argue mining communities were totally destroyed
by the closures and mass unemployment became rife. - Thatcher became even more powerful, dominant and in an even stronger position.
- The remaining coal mines would be privatised by John Major’s government in 1984.
Key differences between the 1974 and the 1984-1985 Miners Strike
- Thatcher’s government had prepared the legal ground by passing the Employment Acts.
- The strike began on 6 March 1984, just as the UK emerged from winter, therefore needing
less energy. Coal stocks had been built up in readiness at the power stations where they would
be needed, not left at the pits where strikers could control it. - Scargill did not ballot union members about the strike action, choosing instead to launch the
strike with ‘flying pickets’. - This caused Nottingham miners to leave the NUM and set up their own union which voted to
keep their mines open. - Scargill lost public opinion due to what were seen as provocative methods (his public
disapproval rating never fell below 79% throughout the years-long strike). - The Labour Movement was not united. Many Labour Party and trade union activists collected
funds to support the strikers. However, despite being the son of a miner himself, Labour Party
leader Neil Kinnock sought to be even-handed, criticising both Miners and Police violence,
and distanced himself from Arthur Scargill. - The strike began in the summer, when demand for coal was at its lowest, whereas previously
the 1974 Miners Strike took place during winter when demand for coal was at its highest. - The government did not make the Miners’ Strike an election issue unlike the Heath
Conservative government.
Scargill’s Mistakes
- NUM president Arthur Scargill made several errors: The strike began on 6 March 1984, just as the
UK emerged from winter, therefore needing less energy. - Scargill did not ballot union members about the strike action, choosing instead to launch the strike
with ‘flying pickets’. - This caused Nottingham miners to leave the NUM and set up their own union which voted to keep
their mines open. - Scargill lost public opinion due to what were seen as provocative methods (his public disapproval
rating never fell below 79% throughout the years-long strike). - The strike was finally defeated on 3 March 1985, almost a year to the day it began, although
miners in Kent held out for a further two weeks.
The Wapping Dispute (1986 - 1987)
- Newspaper proprietors, like Rupert Murdoch, wanted to exploit new technology to reduce their
costs and increase profits. - But they feared strikes as newspapers cannot make up for lost sales – once a day had been lost in
strike, that day’s newspaper sales are gone forever. - Under The Time’s and The Sun’s new Australian-born owner Rupert Murdoch, plans were secretly
laid to defeat the print unions. New technology meant that journalists could type their story direct into the newspaper design, rather than write the story on a typewriter and pass a piece of paper
to others, who would then manually and mechanically make up the page in a process called ‘hot metal’. Those currently doing old jobs would be out of work. Management and trade unions could
not reach agreement and, in January 1986, a strike was called. The management issued dismissal
notices to the 6,000 strikers. - Production of The Times and the company’s other newspapers was moved from offices on London’s Fleet Street to a new home in Wapping, where a new building, with new technology was waiting.
- For a year, the trade unions organised demonstrations, which were often rowdy.
- The police provided continual, often large-scale, supervision. In February 1987, the strike ended;
Murdoch had won.
Popular Opposition to Thatcher
- Thatcher’s economic policies and their impact on society were hugely controversial.
- The parliamentary opposition parties at this time were weak and divided.
- So, people outside of parliament, who were unhappy with Thatcher’s policies, often voiced their
disagreements in other ways.
‘There’s no such thing as society’
- Thatcher aroused a storm when, in an interview printed in a woman’s magazine in October 1987,
she infamously remarked, ‘there’s no such thing as society’. - Her critics seized on this as evidence of her lack of compassion and her wish to encourage
unrestricted individualism [‘rugged individualism’]. - The anti-Thatcher newspaper, The Guardian, reprinted the interview on its front page.
- ‘There are individual men and women, and there are families.
- And no government can do anything except through people, and people must look to themselves
first, it’s our duty to look after ourselves and then to look after our neighbour’. - Opponents said that her statement illustrated why she was willing to cut government spending
on social welfare. - She defended herself by quoting how her statement continued.
- She claimed in fact that her purpose had in fact been to emphasise self-reliance and the
individual’s responsibility towards society [‘rugged individualism’]. - She further claimed she was defending the family as the basic social unit of society against the
social ills of a welfare-benefits dependency-culture. - In her memoirs published in the early 1990s, Thatcher described the social ills of a welfare
benefits dependency-culture she had in mind: - ‘Welfare benefits, distributed with little or no consideration of their effects on behaviour,
encouraged illegitimacy, facilitated the breakdown of families, and replaced incentives favouring
work and self-reliance with perverse encouragement for idleness and cheating’. - It might be thought that her beliefs would have made her government eager to reform the welfare
state. It is true that certain steps were taken. - To tackle what Thatcher called the ‘Why Work?’ problem, her reference to the poverty trap.
- The Poverty Trap was the dilemma facing the low paid; if they continued working there were
penalised by being taxed, which reduced their net income to a level a little higher than if they
simply claimed unemployment benefits. - The government introduced a measure taxing short-term income relief, it also introduced a 5%
cut in unemployment benefits, sickness benefits, work-injury benefits, invalidity benefits and
maternity pay. - However, the government’s public-spending cuts were largely limited overall.
- This was because of the high unemployment rate, resulting from her monetarist and supply side
economic policies, remained so high during her 11 years in office that there was a major increase
rather than a decrease in unemployment benefits payments.