t28 -Appeals from the CC Flashcards
What is the ‘slip rule’ in sentencing?
It is the power of the Crown Court to vary or rescind a sentence or any other order within 56 days of it being made.
Which court can apply the slip rule?
The Crown Court.
What can the slip rule be used for?
- To increase or reduce a sentence
- To correct a sentence that was wrong in principle
What is the time limit for using the slip rule?
56 days from the date of the original sentence or order.
Appeals from CC to COA
Where must appeals relating to trial on indictment be made?
To the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division).
What are the main routes of appeal from the Crown Court to the Court of Appeal?
- Defence appeal against conviction on indictment
- Defence appeal against sentence following conviction on indictment
- Defence appeal against sentence after a committal for sentence from the magistrates’ court
- Prosecution reference (by Attorney General) to review a sentence as unduly lenient
- Prosecution reference (by Attorney General) for an opinion on a point of law following acquittal on indictment
- Prosecution appeal against adverse (terminating) rulings made by the trial judge
Who initiates a prosecution reference to the Court of Appeal?
The Attorney General.
Can the prosecution appeal an acquittal?
Not directly, but the Attorney General can refer a point of law after an acquittal on indictment for an opinion only—it does not affect the acquittal.
DOES NOT AFFECT THE ACCUTUAL ACQUITAL
Appeal by D following conviction on Indictment
What is the statutory authority for a defence appeal against conviction on indictment?
Section 1 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968 (CAA 1968).
Is leave required to appeal against conviction?
Yes, leave is required in most cases. However, in exceptional circumstances, the trial judge may certify that the case is fit for appeal.
What test does the Court of Appeal use to determine the outcome of the appeal?
Under s2 CAA 1968, the Court shall quash the conviction if it thinks the conviction is unsafe.
Test: QUASH THE CONVICTION WHERE THEY FIND THE CONVICTION UNSAFE
Can a defendant appeal a conviction even if they pleaded guilty?
Yes, a guilty plea does not bar an appeal against conviction.
What are common reasons a conviction might be considered unsafe?
A:
- Misdirection on a point of law by the judge during summing up to the jury, such as:
a) Incorrect explanation of the elements of the offence
b) Failure to explain the burden and standard of proof
c) Misleading direction on defences like self-defence or automatism
d) Failure to give a Turnbull direction in identification cases
e) Incorrect legal directions about character evidence or failure to testify
- Misdirection or non-direction on factual issues, for example:
a) Failing to fairly summarise the defence case
b) Unbalanced or biased comments during summing up
c) Failure to direct jury on a critical issue of fact
Can wrongful admission or exclusion of evidence lead to a successful appeal?
Yes. If the judge incorrectly admitted or excluded evidence (e.g., bad character, hearsay, or confession evidence) contrary to established principles, this may form the basis of an appeal.
What is meant by erroneous exercise of judicial discretion in an appeal context?
An appeal may succeed where a judge:
a) Failed to consider relevant factors
b) Considered irrelevant factors
c) Failed to exercise discretion properly
These are rare but valid grounds.
Can wrongful rejection of a submission of no case to answer lead to an appeal?
Yes, if the judge wrongly refused a valid submission of no case to answer, it may result in a successful appeal.
Inconsitent verdicts may lead to the convictions being quashed where no reasonable jury applying its mind to the evidence oculd have reached the conclusion it did
What kinds of defects in the indictment can lead to a conviction being quashed?
a) Improperly joined counts
b) Offences not recognised in law
c) Duplicitous counts (e.g., charging more than one offence in a single count)
What jury-related irregularities could lead to a successful appeal?
a) Jury bias
b) Improper communication between juror and witness
c) Jury misconduct during deliberations
What are inconsistent verdicts and why might they lead to an appeal?
If a jury returns inconsistent verdicts (e.g., acquitting on one count and convicting on another based on the same facts) and no reasonable jury could have done so, the conviction may be quashed.
Can the conduct of the trial judge be a ground for appeal?
Yes, in rare cases. Grounds include:
- Excessive judicial intervention
- Hostility toward defence counsel
Will the Court of Appeal always quash a conviction if one of these issues arises?
eX: Where judge has excessive judicial intervention or hostility towards defence counsel
Not necessarily. The Court considers the case as a whole. If the conviction is still deemed safe, it may be upheld. However, serious defects may require the Court to quash the conviction.
What should be consulted to support an appeal?
Relevant case law should be researched to see how the Court of Appeal has treated similar issues in the past. ( where got judge doing stuff they shld not be doing) - hostility to counsel D, and excessive judicial intervention
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal interfere with a sentence?
A: The Court may interfere if:
- The sentence was not justified in law
- The sentence was wrong in principle or manifestly excessive
- A matter was improperly taken into account at sentencing
- A fresh matter has come to light which may affect sentence
- There was a procedural error, e.g. failure to hold a Newton Hearing
- The appellant has a justifiable sense of grievance, e.g. a sentence indication was not followed
- There was a failure to distinguish between offenders where one had powerful mitigation
- There is serious disparity between co-defendants’ sentences without good reason
(Though the key test remains: Was the appellant’s sentence manifestly excessive?)