T2. w.7 Managing Team Processes Flashcards
traditional hierarchy
set responsibilities, alone accountable for work performance
Network
successful performance depends on interactions with work team, individually and jointly accountable for team’s work product
Benefits of teams:
changing events
solve complex problems - faster
enable greater creativity and innovation
highly motivating
command group is -
collection of subordinates reporting to same supervisor (departments, divisions)
task force is a
special ad hoc committee dealing with a specific issue, come together to accomplish specific goal then usually disband
A team is a
specific type of formal work group in which there is a high level of interaction among group members who work intensely together to achieve a common group goal
Teams differ from other groups in terms of the:
intensity with which team members work together
presence of a team goal or objective
Groups can be:
Informal - social groups formed naturally based on friendships and common interests
Formal- formed by the organisation with designated work and tasks to meet organisational goals
A group is where two or more
people interact with and influence each other, “are psychologically aware of each other and think of themselves as a group” (Martin & Fellenz, 2010, p. 226).
Problem solving teams
- same dept, meet few hours a week to discuss organisational problems
Cross-functional teams -
employees from same level but from dif, areas, working together to accomplish a task
Self-managed work teams -
no manager/members assigned to lead team
Report high job satisfaction
Have higher absenteeism and turnover
May not manage conflict well
How do you get self-managed work teams to overcome issues?
responsibitliy to be self-managing
Making task complex enough to have lots of steps
Careful selection of members for their skills
Guiding members not supervising
Determining training needs and providing that training
Virtual teams
Locations, some evidence that they can be more effective than a team in one location
Reduces costs, faster turnover as they can potentially work across globe 24hrs a day
Tuckman and Jensen’s (1977)
five stage group-development model
Features of Tuckman and Jensen’s (1977) five stage group-development model
- Forming - uncertainty about structure purpose and leadership, testing waters
- Storming - intragroup conflict due to differences, debates over roles & leadership structure
- Norming- cohesiveness and close relationships, group identity and camaraderie
- Performing - fully functional group, ready to work
- Adjourning- wrapping up activities
do temporary groups with deadlines usually follow this sequence?
no, usually follow own sequence
Gersick’s (1988)
punctuated equilibrium model
Gersick’s (1988) punctuated equilibrium model
Involves transitions btw inertia and activity.
Phase 1- locked into one form of action
Transition- major changes, occurs when group has used up half its allotted time at calendar midpoint, groups spurred on to commence a new activity/direction for phase 2, altering the basic course of action midstream as unlikely to do so when transition phase passes
Phase 2- actions put into place, usually characterised by final burst of effort/activity.
IPO
Input Process Output Model of team functioning
Teams inputs relatively stable,
Processes- interactions btw activities and people
Outcomes- results of inputs or processes
These models might not apply to all teams, but can be used to give a general framework by the processes/phases teams are likely to experience over time
Inputs
Composition (size/structure), task/team characteristics, organisational context
Processes
norms & rules, communication, coordination, cohesion, conflict management
Outputs
Performance, member satisfaction, viability, learning outcomes