T2 Topic 5: Stabilization Policy Flashcards
How should policymakers respond to the business cycle? (2 views)
View 1) Economy is inherently unstable and requires gov. intervention to offset fluctuations
View 2) Economy is inherently stable and government intervention only interferes with natural balancing process
See
Post war US data slide
Explain policy lag argument against active policy?
Argues economy is more like a ship than a car tf policymakers tend to oversteer (lags are long and variable (Friedman))
What is an inside lag?
The delay between a shock hitting the economy and policymakers’ reactions (shorter for MP than FP)
What is an outside lag?
Delay between policy action and effect on economy (eg. 18-24months for interest rates)
Why do lags cause a problem for active policy?
During the lag the economy’s state may change
What do automatic stabilisers do?
Shorten the inside time lag associated with fiscal policy
How do automatic stabilisers work?
They either stimulate/contract the economy without the need to enact new policies (eg. Income tax/unemployment insurance)
How do policy makers try to avoid time lags, and what is the issue with it?
They attempt to predict the economic status of the future - but this is very uncertain (see slide data)
See page 5
Shows very difficult to estimate U - tend to underestimate change in U either direction!
Why are forecasts uncertain?
Forecast future based on current and past data, but even that is subject to revision, also no way to predict unexpected events (eg. War)
Why is expected future government policy important?
Because consumption and investment decisions depend on expected future income/profitability and these depend on future gov policy
Lucas (1976)?
Whenever we attempt to analyse the impact of a particular policy change, we need to account for how economic agents will react to that policy change
Tf if we don’t adequately account for expectations, our analysis becomes subject to ‘Lucas critique’
How can the announcement by the government of a credible plan to reduce inflation lead to a the possibility of a costless disinflation?
Previously calculate the sacrifice ratio for a GIVEN Phillips curve; this would lead to large sacrifice ratios (ie. too costly to reduce inflation) tf not attempted
BUT if government announces a credible plan to reduce inflation, agents will alter their Eπ immediately tf PC shifts down straight away and there is no sacrifice ITO output (Rational expectations)
Explain how the mechanism for reducing inflation might put off policymakers?
Contractionary MP -> fall in AD tf temporary fall in Y
Over time Phillips curve shifts back down and end up at Eq with lower inflation
This temp fall in Y puts off policymakers (don’t want to lose elections) (draw diagram!)
What is discretion?
Policymakers set policy on a period-by-period basis, as they see ‘fit’ (active approach)
What are rules?
Policymakers announce in advance how they will respond to various situations and commit themselves to act in this way (active/passive approach)
Give 3 reasons economic policy may be misguided if politicians act with discretion?
1) incompetence: they may not understand the economy well enough to stabilise it successfully
2) vested interests: pressure groups may hold influence over policymakers’ decision making
3) opportunism: temptation to ‘grease the wheels’ of economy prior to election (eg. Cut taxes)