Syscon March test Flashcards
which claim is stronger? in rem or in personam
in rem
what do claims in rem do?
4
- a direct right of control
- absolute right of pursuit
- requirement of delivery
- publicity of the delivery
what does a direct right of control mean?
when there are multiple or competing claims . the owners claim in rem trumps anyone else’s claim in personam
what does absolute right of pursuit mean
an owner is unlawfully dispossessed of something they have a right to claim it back , a claim in property trumps a claim in contract and could cause conflict resulting in invalidity of contract ( the person losing a possession must claim against the person who sold it to them)
what is requirement of delivery
when an owner is transferring right of ownership in a specific property to another, they must deliver the property to that person
what is publicity of the delivery
generally when delivery takes place an element of publicity is needed ( i.e land ownership- transfer with deeds registry)
which type of possession is protected? physical or legal?
legal possession
what are the two questions to know whether or not a possession is protected in law by a claim in rem
- requisite physical control over the thing (corpus)
2. mental element for possession ( animus)
what is a good faith possessor
when a person who is in possession of a thing thinks they are the owner
what are the two types of ownership ( acquisition)
derivative and original
what is derivative acquisition
when a person acquires ownership from another through an exercise of both their wills , an intention to transfer from one and an intention receive from the other . this is coupled with delivery
what is original acquisition
all other cases where ownership is acquired that is not derivative
Original Acquisition: occupation
2
- acquiring ownership of property that had no owner
2. no previous owner, so person who acquires the property becomes the owner
Original Acquisition: accession
3
- property of two owners mixed together , the owner of the principal thing becomes owner of the accessory
- accessory must be lose in its identity
- the incorporation must be inseperable - the owner of principal becomes owner of whole
- the owner of the accessory before it acceded to the thing has a claim in personam of unjustified enrichment against the the owner of the whole
orignial acquisition : fusion
2
- when the property of two different people becomes mingled and is inseparable
- bother are considered owners and own the final product in proportion to their contributions
original acquisition: mixture
2
- when the property of two different people becomes mingled and is separable
- there is no change of ownership , you just recover your portion because they are seperable
Original acquisition: specification
3
- acquiring ownership of one thing that belonged to another by making a new thing from it
- reducibility test - if the materials can be restoed to their former state then the owner of the materials owns the end product, otherwise the maker is the owner
- if the maker contributes some of the materials then the maker is always the owner