Syllabus theme 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Who can apply for voluntary surrender?

A

• The debtor, his or her representative with special authority, the curator bonis of a person who is incapable of handling his own affairs, or the executor of a deceased estate may apply for voluntary surrender.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which formal steps need to be taken before application for voluntary surrender can be made?

A

Preliminary formalities:

  1. Notice of surrender in the Government gazette and Local newspaper
  2. Debtor must send a copy of the notice of surrender to all know addresses of possible creditors within 7 days of the publication of such a notice.
  3. The debtor must prepare a statement of affairs in accordance with Form B of the First Schedule of the Act.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the position if the formal steps to apply for voluntary surrender are not followed?

A

-The court may condone(accept) the mistake where the the mistake constitutes a formal defect.
BUT
-Where the mistake prejudices the creditors, & cannot be corrected by an order of court
-IT may not be condoned!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does the content of an application for Voluntary sequestration entail?

A

¬ The application is brought by way of a notice of motion supported by one or more sworn affidavits; the court’s decision is based on the merits according to the strength of the documentary evidence.
¬ Both the applicant and the opposing creditors must state all the relevant facts in the affidavits brought before the court.
¬ The applicant must lodge these documents at least 2 days before the date of application.
¬ Creditors may also object to an incorrect statement of affairs. Where this happens, the Master or magistrate must certify that an objection was lodged and notify the court of these objections. The applicant may address the court in this regard.
¬ See page 494 for what the affidavit must contain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the applicant of voluntary sequestration need to prove in order to succeed in his application?

A

The applicant of voluntary sequestration need to prove that:
1. Formalities were complied with: (♣ Documentary proof must be given to show that the preliminary formalities were complied with.)

  1. Applicant actually insolvent (♣ Where the statement of affairs shows a credit balance, the applicant will have to prove he is actually that he is nevertheless insolvent.)

3.Sufficient residue to cover sequestration costs (♣ The free residue must be sufficient to cover the costs of sequestration.
→ These costs include:
ϖ Master’s fees, costs of the application, trustee’s compensation and any other liquidation costs.)

  1. Sequestration is to advantage to the creditors. (♣ The applicant must prove that the sequestration is to the advantage of the creditors as a group. In practical terms the creditor must at least receive a non-negligible dividend.
    ♣ The size of the dividend depends on the facts and circumstances of the case and also the attitude of the creditors.
    ♣ No fixed dividend in the Act.
    ♣ Where there is a only a negligible dividend is available after the costs of sequestration have been met, there can be no advantage.
    ♣ Where the creditors are placed in a better position than they were before the date of sequestration it will be to their advantage. )

5.Discretion of the Court
♣ Where all four aspects are proved, the court still has discretion to sequestrate the estate or not. The court has the authority to postpone or refuse the application, where, for example, it was brought with an improper motive and/ or amounts to abuse of the process.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Application for Voluntary Sequestration: Married in COP

A

In the case where spouses are married in Community of property, both parties need to apply for voluntary sequestration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Application for Voluntary Sequestration: Ordinary Partners Living in the republic (PARTNERSHIPS)

A

Have to apply jointly for the voluntary sequestration of the partnership estate.
- Concurrently each partner must also apply for the voluntary surrender of their individual estates.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the purpose of the formalities?

A

♣ to notify the creditors that an application is to be brought, and to enable them to object to such an application.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Kritzinger v Moreletta Motorhawe Projek

A

◌ The notice of surrender was published 32 days before the date of the application.

  • The court held that the time period in section 4(1) was not intended by the legislature to be peremptory. In this regard the court relied heavily on the fact that the legislature has allowed considerable latitude to applicants to publish notice (14 to 30 days).
  • The court also mentioned the that in Ex parte Meyer the court said that the debtor should not be allowed to give long notice, months beforehand, and in that way keep creditors from levying execution and in the meantime. The court in Kritzinger said this could not be the intention in this case as it was only 2 days premature.
  • It is said that in taking this approach the court reverted to relying on the de minimis non curat lex principle.
  • The court was also greatly influenced by the fact that section 4(2) has now been universally held to be directory.
  • *- Ex parte Harmse
  • Non-complience with the time period was condoned
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ex Parte Oosthuizen

A
  • The notice of surrender was published 39 days before the date stipulated for the hearing of the application.
  • The court a quo held this was fatal and declined to accept the surrender.
  • The court of appeal referred to the approach where it must be determined whether the language is peremptory or directory.
  • The court said that the use of the word “shall” in section 4(1) is generally indicative of nullity in the event of non-compliance.
  • The court said that to determine the true aim of section 4(1), it should be read together with section 5. The effect of section 5 is that creditors are deprived of their right to execute against the debtor’s property from the moment of publication of the notice of surrender. To ensure that this interference with the creditors’ rights does not endure for too long, the legislature prescribed a maximum interval for the publication of the notice.
  • There are a precise number of days prescribed by the legislature, however, is that once the notice has been published there should be certainty as to its effect.
  • In allowing this condonation, it would have the effect of the debtor would have the ability to effectively chose the period of the suspension of execution.
  • **- Premature or late publication hardly ever condoned
  • Notice published 39 days before
  • Section 4(1) MUST be complied with
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ex Parte Arntzen (Disclosure of Information)

A
  • Disclosure of information: an even higher standard in the case of friendly sequestration due to the greater risk that creditors interests may be prejudiced.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ex parte Ford

A
  • Main purpose of Insolvency Act
    → Ensure advantage to creditors. (see Ex parte Arntzen)
  • Applicant will have to prove whether debt review is not a better procedure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ex parte Bouwer

A
  • Valuation of property- sufficient information to be given

- Immovable property- complete basis for valuation and how amount was acquired.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Roestoff and Coetzee

A
  • Despite worldwide notion to protect debtors needs
  • In SA system stayed creditor orientated, this is still applicable.
  • The Ex parte Artzen case is a typical result of our courts creditor friendly approach. The only decisive requirement being whether the sequestration is to the advantage of creditors.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Labour Relations Act

A

Section 197B: Disclosure of information concerning insolvency

(1) An employer that is facing financial difficulties that may reasonably result in the winding up or sequestration of the employer must advise a consulting party contemplated in section 189(1).
(2) (a) An employer that applies to be wound up or sequestrated, whether in terms of the Insolvency Act, 1936 or any other law, must at the time of making application, provide a consulting party contemplated in section 189(1) with a copy of the application.
(b) An employer that receives an application for its winding up or sequestration must supply a copy of the application to any consulting party contemplated in section 189(1), within two days of receipt, or if the proceedings are urgent, within 12 hours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Compulsory sequestration:

A
The creditor(s) of an estate can apply for the compulsory sequestration of the debtor's estate. 
- By way of notice of motion supported by affidavit.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Compulsory sequestration: Security

A

The applicant must give security to the Master to defray all sequestration costs until a trustee is appointed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What does the content of Compulsory sequestration entail?

A

a) Full names, dress occupation and status of the applicant creditor, the full names of birth and id number of the respondent debtor as well as information indicating the court’s jurisdiction.
- Marital status of the debtor
- Married?-Full names, date of birth and ID number of his or her spouse;

b) The nature, amount and cause of action of the applicant’s claim and if applicacnle, the nature and value of his or her security.
c) An allegation of the debtor’s actual insolvency or that an act of insolvency has been committed (supported by facts)
d) That there is reason to believe that sequestration will be to the advantage of creditors
e) That security for payment of the costs of sequestration has been loaded with the Master (supported with the Master’s certificate
f) Compliance with the notification procedures in that the prescribed interested parties including the debtor, trade unions, employees and the South African Revenue service were furnished with a copy of the application where applicable.
* Omitted? –> reason must be given

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What happens when application for compulsory sequestration is made?

A
  • Estate is placed under provisional sequestration
  • interested parties are entitled to object to the application by addressing the court at a later date as to the reasons why the sequestration application should not be granted.
  • Creditors/ Debtor bus t prove objection by sworn statements containing all the facts and circumstances of the specific case.
20
Q

What the applicant must prove before the court will finally sequestrate an
estate & what should be proved prima facie on burden of proof?

A
  1. Applicant’s burden of proof
  2. Liquidated claim
  3. Actual Insolvency and acts of insolvency
  4. Advantage for creditors
  5. Granting of provisional sequestration order
  6. Final Sequestration order: Where applicant can prove a liquidated claim on the return date, or that the debtor is insolvent, or advantage to creditors-Court may grant. The debtor may however appeal.
21
Q

Liquidated claims:

A
  • Claim for an amount of money which is certain and determined by an order of court, agreement or otherwise.
  • Claim for delivery of goods or to do or to refrain from doing something or a claim for an amount of money which is in dispute, cannot be a liquidated claim.
  • The claim has to be legal and valid and must not have become unenforceable through prescription.
22
Q

Actual Insolvency and Acts of Insolvency:

A

♣ Practical problem exists in that the creditors must show that the debtor is actually insolvent.
- Creditors therefore often rely on indirect evidence, like dishonouring a cheque or the debtor’s request for an extension of time to pay; not necessarily conclusive.

♣ Alternatively the creditor CAN base his claim on a section 8, act of insolvency:

(a) Leaving the Republic or absence from his home.
(b) Where an order has been given against the debtor; and
(i) He fails, upon demand by the officer whose duty it is to execute the judgement, to satisfy it or to indicate to the officer disposable property sufficient to satisfy the debt.
(ii) It appears from the return by the officer that he has not found sufficient property to satisfy the judgement debt.
(c) A barren household (no assets on the premises).
(d) A disposition of property, giving away assets (eg: selling at a lower price).
(e) If the debtor removes, or attempts to remove and of his property with intent to prejudice his creditors or to prefer one over another.
(f) The debtor would have committed an act of insolvency if he fails to apply for the acceptance of the voluntary surrender of his estate on the date advertised or if he fails to lodge a statement of affairs or lodges one which is incorrect or incomplete.
(g) The debtor gives notice in writing to any of his creditors that he is unable to pay any of his debts. The notice must clearly state that the debtor is unable, and not merely unwilling to pay his debts. The test to be applied is whether the reasonable reader will construe as a notice of the debtors inability to pay.
(h) If, being a trader, he gives notice in the Government Gazette in terms of section 34 of his intention to transfer his business and is thereafter unable to pay his debts.

23
Q

Advantage for creditors:

A

♣ Reasonable prospect that it will be to the advantage of creditors.
♣ There is NO advantage if there is no free residue to pay dividends but rather a risk of contribution.

24
Q

Burden of proof: Compulsory sequestration

A

Applicants’ Burden of Proof:
• In terms of Section 10, must prima facie prove that:
(1) He qualifies as a creditor who may bring the application and that he or she has a liquidated claim of at least R100 or where creditors with separate claims apply jointly, where the total of their claims in aggregate is not less than R200.
(2) The debtor is actually insolvent or has committed an act of insolvency.
There is reason to believe that the sequestration is to the advantage of the creditors

25
Q

Friendly sequestration:

A

♣ In SA law there are insufficient debt relief measures at the disposal of debtors. Consequently, debtors sometimes rely on sequestration proceedings to force a discharge of their debs on their creditors.
♣ A family member or friend thus brings the CompSequest application usually based on an act of insolvency in terms of 8(g)
♣ The courts in these cases have a duty to scrutinise the application with great care to ascertain advantage for creditors and to prevent prejudice to them. The fact that such a relationship exists between the debtor and creditor, should not however prevent the granting of the sequestration order if ll the requirements prescribed for CS are proved

26
Q

What is the position in respect of vexatious applications?

A

♣ If the court is satisfied that an application for CS is an abuse of the court’s procedure, malicious or vexatious, it may award damages to the debtor which he may have sustained by reason of the provisional sequestration of his estate.

27
Q

Position in respect of the costs of the applicant and the costs of
possible opposition by the debtor.

A

♣ The successful applicant’s taxed costs of sequestration are paid from the free residue. Where the free residue is insufficient to pay the costs of sequestration, the applicant has to make a contribution, whether he or she has probed a claim or not.
- The court may also direct the costs of an unsuccessful opposition of the application may also be paid out of the estate if such opposition was bona fide and reasonable, or where exceptional circumstances existed.

28
Q

What is the position in respect of the sequestration of partnership estates?

A

♣ If the court sequestrates a partnership estate, the private estates of each individual partner, except a commenditaire or limited partner, must be sequestrated simultaneously. However, a partner who has undertaken to pay the debts of the partnership within a period determined by the court and has given security for such payment, will not be sequestrated under these circumstances.

29
Q

What was held in Vermeulen v Hubner (Friendly sequestration)

A

♣ In Vermeulen v Hubner it was held that in cases of friendly sequestration, even though it is a CS, the court decided that the applicant (creditor) must in most cases produce a complete statement of assets and liabilities of the respondent (debtor). Also, the creditor must obtain a complete list of the debtor’s creditors and at least 10 days before the application notify them by registered post of the application, stating the place where the documents will be open for inspection.

30
Q

Friendly sequestration: Sewell shop interiors v Van Der Merwe

A

♣ In Sellwell Shop Interiors v Van der Merwe criticised the previous judgement by stating that a court is not empowered to usurp the functions of the legislature by setting further requirements in addition to those imposed by existing legislation. He also decided that in a friendly sequestration the applicant’s motive to assist the debtor does not necessarily amount to abuse of the legal process.

31
Q

Ex parte Shmuker-Tshiko

A

!!!!!

32
Q

SARS v Hawker Air Services (Partnership containing a company)

A

♣ C:SARS v Hawker Air Services it was decided that section 13 of the Insolvency Act did not place an impediment on the sequestration of a partnership where one of the partners was, for example, a company that could not be sequestrated in terms of the Act.

33
Q

Investec Bank Ltd v Mutemeri 2010 1 SA 265 (W)

A

♣ Sequestration is not debt enforcement; it is a unique process.
♣ Debt review not in a way of sequestration application
♣ Section 129 notice and requirements
◌ The court significantly declared that section130(1) does not apply to compulsory sequestration application of a consumer’s estate by a credit provider based on a claim in terms of a credit agreement between them, such an application is “not one for an order enforcing the credit providers claim against the consumer”.
◌ A sequestration proceeding is not subject to the requirement in section 129(1)(b) of the NCA because it is not a debt enforcement proceeding.

34
Q

Maghembe Article:

A

♣ Discussed the cases of Naidoo v ABSA and Investec v Mutemeri.
♣ Both of these cases confirmed that sequestration does not qualify as a legal proceeding to enforce an agreement under section 129 read together with section 130(3) of the NCA.
♣ In Naidoo the Appellate Division confirmed Mutemeri ad held that a credit provider need not comply with the procedures provided in section 129(1) of the NCA before instituting sequestration proceedings against a debtor, as such proceedings are not proceedings to enforce a credit agreement.
♣ The decision in Naidoo, although correct from a hermeneutical point of view it raised concern as to how this precedent, that does not give the consumer the option to continue with debt review when he/she is sequestrated, will affect the efficiency of the NCA… the author Proposes amendments to the NCA- where there is already an order for debt rescheduling, sequestration must not be an option.
♣ Allowing sequestration where the debtor is under debt review is not consistent with principle of encouraging consumers to pay off their debts.

35
Q

Boraine and Van Heerden Article

A

♣ NCA does not regulate interaction between NCA and IA
♣ Debtor doesn’t have free access to remedies
♣ Discussed Ex parte Ford which related to voluntary surrender and section 85 of the NCA.

36
Q

Naidoo v ABSA

A

• Appellate division confirmed Mutemeri

37
Q

Ex parte Shmukler-Tshiko

A
  • In this case the applicants applied for voluntary sequestration of their estates, however their liabilities did not exceed their assets nor had there been an act of insolvency or proven insolvency. It was decided that the court must be satisfied that the sequestration is to the advantage of creditors, and due to the fact that the debtor has all the relevant information to show this, the requirement to disclose such information is more strictly applied in cases of voluntary sequestration.
  • The court came to the conclusion in all but one of the applications that there would be no advantage to creditors in such cases where the debtor has over-burdened themselves, and are not in fact insolvent.
  • The judge in this case made the obiter dictum that the “advantage to creditors” should not merely consider the financial benefit that the creditor would receive, but also includes factors like an investigation into the financial matters of the insolvent.
38
Q

In which section of the Insolvency Act is the advantage to creditors highlighted?

A

♣ Meaning

  • Section 6 (VS)/ 10 and 12 (CS)
  • Financial benefit
39
Q

Burden of proof sections:

A

♣ Section 6: VS
- Court must be satisfied that creditors will benefit from sequestration.
♣ Section 10: CS- Provisional
- Court must prima facie at opinion that there will be advantage.
♣ Section 12: CS- Final
- Court must be satisfied that there is reason to believe that sequestration will be to the advantage of creditors.

40
Q

Section 9

A

Petition for sequestration of an estate

41
Q

Section 10

A

Provisional Sequestration

42
Q

Section 11:

A

Service of rule nisi

43
Q

Section 12:

A

Final Sequestration

44
Q

Section 13

A

Sequestration of partnership estate

45
Q

Section 14

A

Petitioning creditor to prosecute sequestration proceedings until trustee appointed.

46
Q

Section 15

A

Compensation to debtor if petition is an abuse of court’s procedure or malicious or vexatious