Sweep 1.4 Flashcards
For two patients with comparable levels of remaining attachment and alveolar bone, the prognosis is generally better in the older because
shorter time frame in which the destruction has occurred
younger patient suffers from aggressive disease
due to systemic disease or smoking?
The younger patient would be expected to have a greater reparative capacity
Observed destruction indicates that inflammation overcomes repair for this patient, therefore expect poorer outcomes of therapy
level of clinical attachment
(approximate extent of root surface that is devoid of periodontal ligament)
radiographic examination
shows the amount of root surface still invested in bone.
Pocket depth is less important than level of attachment because it is not
necessarily related to bone loss.
In general, a tooth with deep pockets and little attachment and bone loss has a better prognosis than
one with shallow pockets and severe attachment and bone loss.
Type of defect
The prognosis for horizontal bone loss depends on the
height of the existing bone.
Type of defect
In the case of angular defects-
number of remaining walls.
When greater bone loss has occurred on one surface of a tooth, the bone height on the
less involved surfaces should be taken into consideration when determining the prognosis.
The center of rotation of the tooth will be nearer the crown. This results in a more
favorable distribution of forces to the periodontium and less tooth mobility.
In smokers prognosis of slight-to-moderate periodontitis is generally
fair to poor. In patients with severe periodontitis, the prognosis may be poor to hopeless.
Patients with slight to moderate periodontitis who stop smoking can upgraded to a
good prognosis, whereas those with severe periodontitis who stop smoking may be upgraded to a fair prognosis.
Well-controlled diabetics with slight-to-moderate periodontitis who comply with their recommended periodontal treatment should have
a good prognosis.
Plaque retentive factors decrease
prognosis
- Greater gingival inflammation
- More marginal bone loss
- Poorer compliance with home care
Prognosis is poor for teeth with
short tapered roots and large crowns.
Disproportionate crown-to-root ratio
Reduced root surface available for periodontal support
Periodontium may be more susceptible to injury by occlusal forces.
Cervical enamel projections (CEPs), enamel pearls, bifurcation ridges (seen in 73% of mandibular molars)
Interfere with
scaling and root planing
Prevent regeneration of cementum and PDL
Root concavities