Sweep 1.4 Flashcards

1
Q

For two patients with comparable levels of remaining attachment and alveolar bone, the prognosis is generally better in the older because

A

shorter time frame in which the destruction has occurred
younger patient suffers from aggressive disease
due to systemic disease or smoking?
The younger patient would be expected to have a greater reparative capacity
Observed destruction indicates that inflammation overcomes repair for this patient, therefore expect poorer outcomes of therapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

level of clinical attachment

A

(approximate extent of root surface that is devoid of periodontal ligament)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

radiographic examination

A

shows the amount of root surface still invested in bone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Pocket depth is less important than level of attachment because it is not

A

necessarily related to bone loss.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In general, a tooth with deep pockets and little attachment and bone loss has a better prognosis than

A

one with shallow pockets and severe attachment and bone loss.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Type of defect

The prognosis for horizontal bone loss depends on the

A

height of the existing bone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Type of defect

In the case of angular defects-

A

number of remaining walls.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When greater bone loss has occurred on one surface of a tooth, the bone height on the

A

less involved surfaces should be taken into consideration when determining the prognosis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The center of rotation of the tooth will be nearer the crown. This results in a more

A

favorable distribution of forces to the periodontium and less tooth mobility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In smokers prognosis of slight-to-moderate periodontitis is generally

A

fair to poor. In patients with severe periodontitis, the prognosis may be poor to hopeless.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Patients with slight to moderate periodontitis who stop smoking can upgraded to a

A

good prognosis, whereas those with severe periodontitis who stop smoking may be upgraded to a fair prognosis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Well-controlled diabetics with slight-to-moderate periodontitis who comply with their recommended periodontal treatment should have

A

a good prognosis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Plaque retentive factors decrease

A

prognosis

  • Greater gingival inflammation
  • More marginal bone loss
  • Poorer compliance with home care
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Prognosis is poor for teeth with

A

short tapered roots and large crowns.
Disproportionate crown-to-root ratio
Reduced root surface available for periodontal support
Periodontium may be more susceptible to injury by occlusal forces.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cervical enamel projections (CEPs), enamel pearls, bifurcation ridges (seen in 73% of mandibular molars)
Interfere with

A

scaling and root planing
Prevent regeneration of cementum and PDL
Root concavities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Root concavities appear more marked on

A

maxillary first premolars, the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar.
These concavities increase the attachment area and produce a root shape that may be more resistant to torquing forces.

17
Q

In drug-influenced gingival enlargement, plaque control

A

alone does not prevent development of the lesions, and surgical intervention is usually necessary to correct the alterations in gingival contour.

18
Q

(slight-to-moderate periodontitis), the prognosis is

A

generally good provided the inflammation can be controlled.

19
Q

The tissue destruction in these cases is not reversible and poor control of the secondary factors may make these patients susceptible to recurrence of the disease. With repeated episodes of NUG, the prognosis may be downgraded to

A

fair.

20
Q

Herpes simplex 1 usually causes

A

oral manifestations.

21
Q

Hereditary gingival fibromatosis-

Possible mechanism(s):

A

TGF-beta1 favor the accumulation of ECM.
May be located on chromosome 2 in human.
[ Defect in the Son of Sevenless-1 gene on chromosome 2p21-p22]

22
Q

Type I reactions (immediate Type),mediated by I

A

IgE,

or

23
Q

Type IV reactions (delayed type) mediated by

A

T-cells.

[12-48 hrs following contact with allergen]