Supreme Court Cases In American History Flashcards
Fletcher v. Peck
(1810, Marshall) The decision stems from the Yazoo land cases, 1803, and upholds the sanctity of contracts
McCullock v. Maryland
(1819, Marshall) The court ruled that states cannot tax the federal government, i.e. the Bank of the United States; the phrase “the power to tax is the power to destroy”; confirmed the constitutionality of the Bank of the United States
Dartmouth College v. Woodward
(1819, Marshall) New Hampshire had attempted to take over Dartmouth College by revising its colonial charter. The court ruled that the charter was protected under the contract clause of the U.S. Constitution; upholds the sanctity of contracts
Gibbons v. Ogden
(1824, Marshall) Affirmed Congressional power over interstate commerce
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
(1824, Marshall) “The conditions of the Indians in relation to the U.S. is perhaps unlike that of any two people in existance,” Chief Justice John Marshall wrote,”Their relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian…(they were a) domestic dependent nation.” Established a “trust relationship” with the tribes directly under federal authority
Worcester v. Georgia
(1832, Marshall) Established tribal autonomy; Tribes were “distinct political communities, having territorial boundaries within which their authority is exclusive.”
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge
(1837, Taney) The interests of the community are more important than the interests of business; the supremacy of society’s interns over private interest
Commonwealth v. Hunt
(1842) Declared that labor unions were lawful organizations and that the strike was a lawful weapon
Dred Scott v. Sanford
(1857, Taney) Speaking for a widely divided court, Chief Justice Taney ruled that Dred Scott was not a citizen and had no standing in court; Scott’s residence in a free state and territory had not made him free since he returned to Missouri; Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in a territory (based on the 5th Amendment right of a person to be secure from seizure of property), this voiding the Missouri Compromise of 1820
Wabash, St. Louis, and Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois
(1886) Declared state-passed laws that regulated interstate commerce unconstitutional
U.S. v. E. C. Knight Co.
(1895) Due to a narrow interpretation of the Sherman Anti-trust Act, the Court undermined the authority of the federal government to act against monopolies
Plessy v. Ferguson
(1896) Legalized segregation on the basis of “separate but equal”
“Insular Cases”/ Downes v. Bidwell
(1901) Confirmed the right of the federal government to place tariffs on goods entering the U.S. from its territories on the grounds that “the Constitution does not follow the flag”
Northern Securities Co. v. U.S.
(1904) Re-established the authority of the federal government to fight monopolies under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act
Lochner v. New York
(1905) Declared unconstitutional a New York act limiting the working hours of bakers due to a denial of the 14th Amendment rights