Supreme Court Cases Flashcards

0
Q

Federalism

                                       Gibbons v. Ogden 
                                                  1824  http://www.oyez.org/cases/1792-1850/1824/1824_0
A
  1. Did the State of New York exercise authority in a realm reserved exclusively to Congress, namely, the regulation of interstate commerce?
  2. Regulation of navigation by steamboat operators and others for purposes of conducting interstate commerce was a power reserved to and exercised by the Congress.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Federalism

                  McCulloch v. Maryland 
                                 1819

http://www.oyez.org/cases/1792-1850/1819/1819_0

A
  1. Did Congress have the authority to establish the bank?
  2. The Court held that Congress had the power to incorporate the bank and that Maryland could not tax instruments of the national government employed in the execution of constitutional powers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Federalism

                                              US v. Lopez 
                                                  1955 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_93_1260
A
  1. Is the 1990 Gun-Free School Zones Act, forbidding individuals from knowingly carrying a gun in a school zone, unconstitutional because it exceeds the power of Congress to legislate under the Commerce Clause?
  2. Yes. The law is a criminal statute that has nothing to do with commerce or any sort of economic activity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Institutions of Goverment

                                      Marbury v. Madison
                                                  1803 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1792-1850/1803/1803_0/
A
  1. Is Marbury entitled to his appointment, and is the Supreme Court the place for Marbury to get the relief he requests?
  2. Yes. The justices held, through Marshall’s forceful argument, that on the last issue the Constitution was “the fundamental and paramount law of the nation” and that “an act of the legislature repugnant to the constitution is void.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Institution of Goverment

                                  United States v. Nixon
                                                  1974 

http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1974/1974_73_1766

A
  1. Is the President’s right to safeguard certain information, using his “executive privilege” confidentiality power, entirely immune from judicial review?
  2. No. The Court held that neither the doctrine of separation of powers, nor the generalized need for confidentiality of high-level communications, without more, can sustain an absolute, unqualified, presidential privilege.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Institutions of Gov

                                         Baker v. Carr
                                                1962 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1960/1960_6
A

1.Did the Supreme Court have jurisdiction over questions of legislative apportionment?

2.The Court held that there were no such questions to be answered in this case and that legislative apportionment was a justiciable issue.
I

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Civil Rights

           Dred Scott v. Sanford
                         1857

http://www.oyez.org/cases/1851-1900/1856/1856_0

A
  1. Was Dred Scott free or slave?

2. The Court then held the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, hoping to end the slavery question once and for all.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Civil Rights

Plessy v. Ferguson 1896

http://www.oyez.org/cases/1851-1900/1895/1895_210/

A
  1. Is Louisiana’s law mandating racial segregation on its trains an unconstitutional infringement on both the privileges and immunities and the equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment?
  2. The justices based their decision on the separate-but-equal doctrine, that separate facilities for blacks and whites satisfied the Fourteenth Amendment so long as they were equal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Civil Rights

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka 1954

http://www.lawnix.com/cases/brown-board-education.html

A
  1. Is the race-based segregation of children into “separate but equal” public schools constitutional?
  2. The race-based segregation of children into “separate but equal” public schools violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and is unconstitutional.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Civil Rights

(Heart of) Atlanta Motel v. United States 1964

http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1964/1964_515

A
  1. Did Congress, in passing Title II of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, exceed its Commerce Clause powers by depriving motels, such as the Heart of Atlanta, of the right to choose their own customers?
  2. The Court held that the Commerce Clause allowed Congress to regulate local incidents of commerce, and that the Civil Right Act of 1964 passed constitutional muster.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Civil Rights

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 1978

http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1977/1977_76_811

A
  1. Did the University of California violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
  2. Four of the justices contended that any racial quota system supported by government violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Civil Liberties

Schenck v. United States

http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1918/1918_437/

A
  1. Are Schenck’s actions protected by the free speech clause of the First Amendment?
  2. Holmes, speaking for a unanimous Court, concluded that Schenck is not protected in this situation. The character of every act depends on the circumstances. During wartime, utterances tolerable in peacetime can be punished.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Civil Liberties

Gitlow v. New York 1925

http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1922/1922_19/

A
  1. Is the New York law punishing advocacy to overthrow the government by force an unconstitutional violation of the free speech clause of the First Amendment?
  2. By virtue of the liberty protected by due process that no state shall deny.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Civil Liberties

Mapp v. Ohio 1962

http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1960/1960_236

A
  1. Were the confiscated materials protected by the First Amendment?
  2. The Court brushed aside the First Amendment issue and declared that “all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Constitution is, inadmissible in a state court.”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Civil Liberties

Engel v. Vitale

http://projects.oyez.org/shifting-scales

A
  1. Does the reading of a nondenominational prayer at the start of the school day violate the “establishment of religion” clause of the First Amendment?
  2. This was the first in a series of cases in which the Court used the establishment clause to eliminate religious activities of all sorts, which had traditionally been a part of public ceremonies.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Civil Liberties

Miranda v. Arizona 1966

http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_759

A
  1. Does the police practice of interrogating individuals without notifiying them of their right to counsel and their protection against self-incrimination violate the Fifth Amendment?
  2. The Court held that prosecutors could not use statements stemming from custodial interrogation of defendants unless they demonstrated the use of procedural safeguards “effective to secure the privilege against self- incrimination.”
16
Q

Civil Liberties

Tinker v. Des Moines 1969

http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_21/

A
  1. Does a prohibition against the wearing of armbands in public school, as a form of symbolic protest, violate the students’ freedom of speech protections guaranteed by the First Amendment?
  2. Justice Abe Fortas delivered the opinion of the 7-2 majority.
17
Q

Civil Liberties

Lemon v. Kurtzman 1971

http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1970/1970_89

A
  1. Did the Rhode Island and Pennsylvania statutes violate the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause by making state financial aid available to “church- related educational institutions”?
  2. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice Burger articulated a three-part test for laws dealing with religious establishment.
18
Q

Civil Liberties

New York Times v. United States 1971

http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1970/1970_1873/

A
  1. Did the Nixon administration’s efforts to prevent the publication of what it termed “classified information” violate the First Amendment?
  2. its per curiam opinion the Court held that the government did not overcome the “heavy presumption against” prior restraint of the press in this case.
19
Q

Civil Liberties

Furman v. Georgia 1972

http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_69_5003

A
  1. Does the imposition and carrying out of the death penalty in these cases constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments?
  2. The Court’s one-page per curiam opinion held that the imposition of the death penalty in these cases constituted cruel and unusual punishment and violated the Constitution.