Supreme Court Cases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Marbury v. Madison

A

Marbury v. Madison strengthened the federal judiciary by establishing for it the power of judicial review, by which the federal courts could declare legislation, as well as executive and administrative actions, inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution (“unconstitutional”) and therefore null and void.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

McCulloch v. Maryland

A

The court decided that the Federal Government had the right and power to set up a Federal bank and that states did not have the power to tax the Federal Government. Marshall ruled in favor of the Federal Government and concluded, “the power to tax involves the power to destroy.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

US v. Lopez

A

Lopez, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on April 26, 1995, ruled (5–4) that the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 was unconstitutional because the U.S. Congress, in enacting the legislation, had exceeded its authority under the commerce clause of the Constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Baker v. Carr

A

Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Supreme Court case that held that federal courts could hear cases alleging that a state’s drawing of electoral boundaries, i.e. redistricting, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Shaw v. Reno

A

Using the Shaw v. Reno decision, the justices decided that using racial reasons for redistricting is unconstitutional. Since Georgia’s General Assembly used “race for its own sake and not other districting principles,” their actions were rendered unconstitutional.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Citizens United v. FEC

A

It was argued in 2009 and decided in 2010. The court held 5-4 that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent spending for political campaigns by corporations, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other associations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Engel v. Vitale

A

But the Supreme Court decision in Engel v. Vitale (1962) held that official recitation of prayers in public schools violated the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. The ruling is hailed by some as a victory for religious freedom, while criticized by others as striking a blow to the nation’s religious traditions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Wisconsin v. Yoder

A

Yoder, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on May 15, 1972, ruled (7–0) that Wisconsin’s compulsory school attendance law was unconstitutional as applied to the Amish (primarily members of the Old Order Amish Mennonite Church), because it violated their First Amendment right to free exercise of religion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Tinker v. Des Moines

A

In Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969), the Supreme Court ruled that public school officials cannot censor student expression unless they can reasonably forecast that the speech will substantially disrupt school activities or invade the rights of others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Schenck v. United States

A

United States, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on March 3, 1919, that the freedom of speech protection afforded in the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented to society a “clear and present danger.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

New York Times v. United States

A

The Court ruled that the intent of the publication was not to put the U.S. in danger but to educate the American people about the Vietnam War. By preventing the New York Times from publishing the material, the reporters’ 1st Amendment rights were being violated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

McDonald v. Chicago

A

The Supreme Court answered that question in 2010, with its ruling on McDonald v. Chicago. In a plurality opinion, a 5–4 majority held that “the right to possess a handgun in the home for the purpose of self-defense” is applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Gideon v. Wainwright

A

In a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Hugo L. Black, the Court held that it was consistent with the Constitution to require state courts to appoint attorneys for defendants who could not afford to retain counsel on their own.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly