Supreme Court Flashcards

1
Q

Fusion of Powers

A

overlap between two or more branches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Example of Fusion of Powers

A

MPs can be executive
Law Lords before the creation of the SC in 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Issues with Fusion Of Powers

A

can be bias
undermines the extend we can hold the gov to account

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What Acts Established The SC?

A

The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 - moved it away from HL
The Supreme Court Act 2009 - created it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The Original Roles Of The Lord Chancellor

A

cabinet minister, supervise legal system (executive)
chairmen of sitting of the HL (legislative)
head of judiciary, appoints judges (judiciary)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Problems with the Original Roles Of The Lord Chancellor

A

too much power/ overlap
breaches the principle of separation of power
not democratic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which Roles Were Taken From The Lord Chancellor?

A

chairmen of sitting of the HL (legislative)
- given to Lord Speaker
head of judiciary, appoints judges (judiciary)
- Independent Judicial Appointment Committee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The Aims Of The 2005 Reforms

A

bring greater transparency
bring UK in line with other modern democracies
end fusion of power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Main Roles of The SC?

A

hear appeals on arguable points of law that involve nation and constitutional issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How To Become A Member of SC?

A

serve as senior judge for 2 years
lawyer for at least 15 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Judicial Neutrality

A

make decisions without bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ways To Protect JN

A

Conflicts of Interest
- refuse to sit on cases with family/friend/ professional associate
Public Activities
- avoid politics = politically neutral

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Judicial Independence

A

free from political interference
so they can judge on a conflict between state and citizen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Judicial Independence Maintained

A

Physical separation as SC is on Middlesex Guildhall while P on Westminster Square
Judge can’t be an MP
Salary determined by Senior Salaries Review Body and paid by Consolidated Fund
Act of Settlement 1701 - judged fired by both houses = tenure as unlikely to happen
The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 - remove Law Lords, SC in 2009
Judicial Appointments Committee appoints instead of Lord Chancellor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Judicial Independence Not Maintained

A

Justice Secretary
can reject nominee
but only in exceptional circumstances
but still prevents full separation of power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Judicial Neutrality Maintained

A

case open to public
live streamed

17
Q

Judicial Neutrality Not Maintained

A

elitist/ out of touch
drawn into major political disputes
- HRA/Brexit cases

18
Q

Why Were The 3 Judges “Enemies Of The People”?

A

said gov would need Parliamentary consent to trigger Article 50 for Brexit as ref are not binding
already had referendum consent (52%)
delayed Brexit
+ Brexit is more legitimate as people and parliament wanted it

19
Q

SC’s actions is an Act is in conflict with ECHR

A

determines if gov’s actions are according to law through judicial review
if unlawful then decision is quashed
declaration of incompatibility (Rwanda Safety Bill, Abu Qatada)

20
Q

Ultra Vires

A

if a public body or gov had gone beyond their authority

21
Q

Judicial Review +

A

professionals
separation of power can hold gov to account
appointed by IJAC
prevents tyranny of majority
does right over popular thing

22
Q

Judicial Review -

A

unelected so shouldnt go against democratic democratic legitimacy of gov
no right to stop things that are popular or mandate