Supply-side Policies Flashcards
1
Q
What are supply-side policies?
A
Policies aimed at improving the productive capacity of the economy by improving the quantity, quality and/ or mobility of the factors of production
2
Q
What are free market supply side policies?
A
- free market economists believe allocative efficiency is best when the free market is left to its own devices
- e.g. deregulation, tax/ benefit reform, corporation tax reform, privatisation
3
Q
What are interventionist supply side policies?
A
- interventionists argue that the government in some cases has to intervene in the economy as a whole and individual markets
- e.g. education and training (government spending), redefine labour markets (change legislation)
4
Q
Deregulation explanation
A
- labour markets are highly regulated with things such as maternity pay
- ^free market economists argue this reduces productivity, makes it more difficult and expensive to find labour and drives firms away from the country
- a deregulated labour market will increase the quantity of labour and enterprise (more firms incentivised to set up and hire workers)
- also environmental regulations increase costs for firms/ barriers to entry
5
Q
Deregulation evaluation
A
- deregulation increases inequality (owners of the firm will have more profit but workers have lower and insecure incomes)
- insecure incomes will decrease MPC which reduces aggregate demand
- likely fall in tax revenue if deregulated labour markets are scaled up as they are less formal
6
Q
Tax/ benefit reform explanation
A
- reduced income tax at the lower end incentivises people to join the labour force, especially true if out of work benefits are also reduced or made harder to claim
- the voluntarily unemployed will join the labour force which increases the quantity of labour
- reduced income tax at the top end will incentivise the most talented workers to stay in the country and improve their performance
- ^this increases quality of labour and a ‘trickle down effect’ as high income individuals spend more creating a multiplier effect
7
Q
Tax/ benefit reform evaluation
A
- government receives less tax revenue and so will either cut public services or run a larger deficit
- ^free market economists would counter this by saying it’s true in the short run but in the long run more employment and lower benefits will improve the budget position
- this assumes there are jobs available/ there isn’t geographical and occupational immobility
- if benefits are cut and people do not become employed then nothing is gained and poor people are made poorer
8
Q
Corporation tax reform explanation
A
- cuts to corporation tax would mean firms have more retained profits for investment
- lower corporation tax incentivises firms to stay in the country and invest in human/ physical capital
- low corporate tax incentivises nee firms to set up and attracts foreign investment
- more investment by firms increases the quality of labour and capital/ more firms joining the economy increases quantity of enterprise
9
Q
Corporation tax reform evaluation
A
- the Laffer curve predicts lower tax rate may increase tax revenue as fewer firms are incentivised to use ‘creative accounting’ to pay the full amount
- increased retained profit may not lead to more investment, firms could just pay higher dividends to shareholders
- firms may choose to invest in operations outside of the UK
- if the Laffer curve theory is incorrect, like most economists believe, then all that will happen is a tax revenue loss and increased budget deficit
10
Q
The Laffer Curve
A
- the curve shows that as tax rates increase, tax revenue increases until a certain point
- after this certain point (at the peak of the curve) the revenue will decrease despite rates increasing
- this is because high rates will disincentivise firms from investing
- it also disincentivises workers from working harder for a pay rise
- it incentivises tax avoidance and emigration of skilled labour and firms outsourcing production
- the figure for the peak of the curve is arbitrary
11
Q
Privatisation explanation
A
- some industries are state-owned enterprises, typically in strategic infrastructure sectors with high start- up costs such as transport
- the production costs are financed by the state and profits are reinvested or used to support government spending (state monopoly)
- free market economists argue nationalised enterprises are inefficient, no competition means they lack market discipline and no incentive to be more productive
- turning these into private markets will reintroduce competition and productive efficiency increasing quality of enterprise
12
Q
Privatisation evaluation
A
- due to the sectors of nationalised industries having high barriers to entry/ start-up costs, only large firms are attracted
- most state monopolies then become private oligopolies with a lack of market disciplined, higher prices and poor service
- in order to maintain a surplus on the financial account the UK has to sell assets meaning many of these industries are run by foreign firms, e.g. Tata Steel