Summer exams - dissolution of the monasteries Flashcards
Positive impacts of the dissolution of the monasteries ( The crown)
- the crown itself gained because it aquired the former monastic lands, worth £1.3 million
- money enabled the king to fund new costal defences and build new warships
- helped king prepare fro french invasion
What did the crown do with the money from the dissolution
1) 2/3rds of monastic lands were sold off to pay for Henry’s wars, raising about £800,000 for the king
2) the rest was sold off by the end of the tudor period
who else benefitted from the dissolution (rich)
- nobility and gentry (those who bought the land)
- king was able to earn additional money by selling them to the rising elite
- also cultivated loyalty among the nobility by granting these properties who had proven their faithfulness through years of the refromation
examples of people beneiftting from the dissolution
- the Russel family in the south-west and bedforshire
- used land to establish themselves as important land owners, turning fromer monastry of woburn Abbey into their family home
Who else benfitted from the dissolution (former workers)
- abots and priors who did not resist the dissolution were either given pensions or found another role within the church as a bishop or clergy
- abbot of Romsey for example, recieved a pension of £266 a year
What did Cromwell do to manage the kings funds after the dissolution
- cromwell even set up a special financial office, the court of Augmentations, to deal with lands, money and treasure that were taken from the monasteries
counter argument agsinst crown
- however could be argued that this was more beneficial to the king and to the rising elite
- for the majority of tudor sociey would not have benefitted and in fact made it worse
- however, king still is head of the country. If he is financially stable then its good. Helped aginst france, threat to whole country and feeling of more security.
negative impacts of the dissolution of monasteries, poverty (nuns and monks)
- about 7,000 ex-monks and nuns had to fnid a new life and way to support themselves after the dissolution, lost their jobs, fear of becoming vagrants
- nuns and friars recieved a smaller pension than monks, who got around £5 a year
why were former nuns particularly badly hit
- henry insisted that they were not to break their vow of chacity, meaning they could not get married
- without a husband, it was difficult to make a living
negative impacts of the dissolution of monasteries, poverty (POOR)
- removed the safety net provided by the monasteries, increased harship for those who relied on them
- monaseries were a traditional source of support and alms for the poor, unemployement rose and more ppl fell into poverty with little or no support on land to help
- people often had to resort to begging in order to feed themselves
what did the monasteries use to provide for the poor
- supported poor, monks and nuns would give their leftover food to the poor and provided hospitals to care for the sick
negative impacts of the dissolution of monasteries, poverty (ill and weak)
- also destroyed sanctuaries for the ill or weak
Monasteries and POG
- the dissokuton was felt most in the poorest areas, particualry in the north where the Pog began as a protest to the dissolution of the smaller monasteries
- october 13th 1536, 40,000 people led by Robert Aske to convince Henry to stop attacks on the churches and moasteries
Counter argument dissoltion and poverty (jobs)
- the rise of grammar schools provided a place of employment for former monks who had lived in religious hosues
- six of the monasteries were changed into catherdrals with completley new dioceses, including canterbury, winchester, ely and druham,
- this created new chapters and secular orders that relgious men could join as an alternative to monstic life
counter argument against dissolution (pog)
additionally, the pog was also caused by bad harvests of 1535 and rumours of sheep tax. Also wanted to retsore papal authority in engalnd
despite this, not enough houses, still did contribute, poor.