Substantive Law Flashcards

1
Q

What are the core international crimes under international law?

A

Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity (CAH), War Crimes, and Aggression.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What differentiates the four core international crimes?

A

Genocide: Requires specific intent to destroy a group.
CAH: Involves widespread/systematic attacks against civilians.
War Crimes: Committed during armed conflicts, violating IHL.
Aggression: A leadership crime involving the planning, preparation, or execution of acts of state-level violence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the sources of International Criminal Law (ICL)?

A

Treaty law.
Customary international law.
General principles of law.
Judicial decisions and qualified publicists’ writings.
Decisions by international organizations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What provision defines the sources of law for the ICC?

A

Article 21 of the Rome Statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How is aggression defined in the Rome Statute?

A

Planning, preparation, or execution by leaders of state-level acts violating the UN Charter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the jurisdictional mechanisms for aggression under Articles 15bis and 15ter?

A

State referral or Prosecutor’s initiative after six months without UNSC activity (15bis).
UNSC referral (15ter).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What contextual elements define CAH under the Rome Statute?

A

Widespread or systematic attack.
Directed against civilians.
Committed with knowledge of the attack.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

List five acts that qualify as Crimes Against Humanity.

A

Murder.
Extermination.
Enslavement.
Deportation or forcible transfer.
Torture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What distinguishes war crimes from other ICL violations?

A

They require a nexus to armed conflict and constitute serious violations of International Humanitarian Law (IHL).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the two types of armed conflict relevant to war crimes?

A

International armed conflict (IAC): Between states.
Non-international armed conflict (NIAC): Between states and organized non-state groups or within groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the protected groups under the Genocide Convention?

A

National, ethnic, racial, and religious groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the five acts that constitute genocide?

A

Killing members of the group.
Causing serious harm to members of the group.
Inflicting conditions of life calculated to destroy the group.
Imposing measures to prevent births.
Forcibly transferring children.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the main categories of modes of liability in ICL?

A

Direct perpetration: Individual commits the crime.
Co-perpetration: Jointly committed through a common plan.
Indirect perpetration: Crime committed through another person.
Aiding and abetting: Assisting or encouraging a crime.
Command responsibility: Superiors held liable for subordinates’ crimes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the significance of Article 25(3)(a) of the Rome Statute?

A

It outlines liability for direct, co-, and indirect perpetration of crimes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the grounds for excluding criminal responsibility under Article 31 of the Rome Statute?

A

Mental disease or defect.
Intoxication (if involuntary).
Self-defense or defense of others.
Duress or necessity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How does the Rome Statute address superior orders as a defense?

A

Under Article 33, superior orders may exclude responsibility if the accused had no knowledge of unlawfulness and the order was not manifestly unlawful.