Subjects: States and Peoples Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What do you need to have to be a subject of IL?

A

Rights, Obligations and Capacity to create international law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do states, international organisations and corporations differ?

A

States; have all three.
IOs: depends on their function, they have legal personality as far as functions they perform.
Corporation: May have some, subject to the extent it has rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What two theories support a state’s existence?

A

Constitutional Theory; and

Declarative theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In ICC-01/18, what was the ICC to determine?

A
  1. Whether Palestine can be considered a ‘State on the territory of which the conduct in question occured’l
  2. Its territorial jurisdiction in the present situation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What could the ICC not do? What did it determine as a result?

A
  • Couldn’t determine matters of statehood binding the international community.
  • Its sole purpose is territorial jurisdiction.
  • Therefore, Palestine accede under ordinary procedure as state party to rome statute so did have territorial jurisdiction over Palestine.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What explains the strong correlation between Self-determination and statehood? (Crawford, 434)

A
  1. The evident desire of the palestinians of the Occupied Territories for their own states
  2. The recalcitrance of Israel in recognising their right to self-determination.

Constitute a ‘prefiguration’ of statehood.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was issue in Unilateral Declaration of Independence in respect of Kosovo? (2010)

A

Is the unilateral declaration of independence by the provisional institutions of self-government of Kosovo in accordance with international law?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In Kosovo, what was court NOT asked to do>

A
  • Whether IL confers positive entitlement on Kosovo unilaterally to declare its independence.
  • Or whether IL generally confers an entitlement on entities situated within state unilaterally to break away?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How did ICJ in UDI in Kosovo determine?

A

Shifted focus away from Provisional Institutions of Self Government in Kosovo. Said the declaration was by persons acting together in their capacity as representatives of people of Kosovo outside framework of interim administration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did ICJ in Kosovo say about principle of territorial integrity? And subsequently, role of SC in condemning declarations?

A
  • Principle of TI is confined to the sphere of relations between states.
  • SC: Illegality stemming from their declarations came from fact they were connected with unlawful use of force or other violations of norms of GIL.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the legal questions of Opinion 1 of the Badinter commission?

A
  1. Whether the republics of SFRY are in the process of secession from the SFRY (whereby the SFRY would continue to exist) or;
  2. Whether SFRY was in process of dissolution?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was decided in Opinion 1 of Badinter Commission

A

Applicable law: Territory, population in organised political authority.

Applied: Republics expressed desire for independence and workings of essential organs no longer meet criteria of participation and representativeness inherent in a federal state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What question was in Opinion 2 of Badinter Commission?

A

Whether the Serbian people in Croatia and BH have right to self-determination?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was decided in Opinion 2?

A

Applicable law: Uti possidetis; or one or more groups of ethnic religious or language communities = right to SD

Applied: IL ensures respect for rights of minorities. Serbian population must be afforded every right accorded to minorities. Eg nationality of their choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was question in Opinion 3?

A

Whether the boundaries between Croatia, Serbia and BH will be regarded as international boundaries (after dissolution)?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was determined regarding boundaries in O3?

A
  1. In line with Declaration…Friendly Relations
  2. Boundaries between Croatia-Serb and BH-Serbia may not be altered unless by agreement freely arrived at.
  3. Former boundaries become boundaries protected by IL (Utility possidetis and Burkina-Faso/ Mali).
  4. Force won’t create legal effect.
17
Q

What were key conclusions of separation of Chagos?

A

1) ) Respect for territorial integrity of non self-governing territory.
2) People of SG territories are entitled to exercise right to SF, which should be respected by administering power.
3) unless detachment by administering power is based on freely expressed and genuine will of people of territory concerned, contrary to right of SD.