STYLE APPROACH Flashcards
Leadership Style Approach
2 Types
- Task behaviours
Facilitate goal accomplishment: Help group members achieve objectives- Relationship behaviours
Help subordinates feel comfortable with themselves, each other, and the situation
- Relationship behaviours
- Emphasizes the behaviour of the leader and focuses exclusively on what leaders do and how they act
University of Michigan Studies: Results
Results – Two types of leadership behaviours conceptualized as opposite ends of a single continuum
* Employee orientation: Strong human relations emphasis
* Production orientation: Stresses the technical aspects of a job
- Later studies reconceptualized behaviours as two independent leadership orientations – possible orientation to both at the same time
Blake & Mouton’s Managerial Grid (1964)
Interpersonal skills and conscientiousness (goal driven)
( Two factors )
- Concern for production/tasks
* How a leader is concerned with achieving organizational tasks - Concern for people/relationships
- How a leader attends to the members of the organization who are trying to achieve its goals
- Authority-Compliance (9,1)
Focused on task
Not so much focused on people
- Efficiency in operations results from arranging conditions of work such that human interference is minimal
- Role focus
- Heavy emphasis on task and job requirements and less emphasis on people
- Communicating with subordinates mainly for task instructions
- Results driven – people regarded as tools to that end
- 9,1 leaders – seen as controlling, demanding, hard-driving, & overpowering
- Country Club (1,9)
Focus mainly on the relationship
* Thoughtful attention to the needs of people leads to a comfortable, friendly organizational atmosphere and work tempo
- Role focus
- Low concern for task accomplishment coupled with high concern for interpersonal relationships
- De-emphasizes production; leaders stress the attitudes and feelings of people
- 1,9 leaders – try to create a positive climate by being agreeable, eager to help, comforting, noncontroversial
- Impoverished (1,1)
Older people…Do not want to lean into the task or relationship side. Going through the motion
* Minimal effort exerted to get work done is appropriate to sustain organizational membership
- Role focus
- Leader unconcerned with both task and interpersonal relationships
- Going through the motions, but uninvolved and withdrawn
- 1,1 leaders – have little contact with followers and are described as indifferent, noncommittal, resigned, and apathetic
- Middle-of-the-road (5,5)
- Adequate organizational performance possible through balancing the necessity of getting work done while maintaining satisfactory morale
- Role focus
- Leaders who are compromisers; have intermediate concern for task and people who do task
- To achieve equilibrium, leader avoids conflict while emphasizing moderate levels of production and interpersonal relationships
- 5,5 leader – described as expedient; prefers the middle ground, soft-pedals disagreement, swallows convictions in the interest of “progress
Team (9,9) …Leadership that we want
- Work accomplished through committed people; interdependence via a “common stake” in the organization’s purpose, which leads to relationships of trust and respect
- Role focus
- Strong emphasis on both tasks and interpersonal relationships
- Promotes high degree of participation & teamwork, satisfies basic need of employee to be involved & committed to their work
- 9,9 leader – stimulates participation, acts determined, makes priorities clear, follows through, behaves open-mindedly and enjoys working
- Paternalism / Maternalism (1,9 ; 9,1)
- Reward and approval are bestowed on people in return for loyalty and obedience; failure to comply leads to punishment
- Role focus
- Leaders who use both 1,9 and 9,1 without integrating the two
- The “benevolent dictator”; acts gracious for purpose of goal accomplishment
- Treats people as though they were disassociated from the task
- Regards the organization as a family
- Makes most of the key decisions
- Rewards loyalty and punishes non-compliance
Opportunism
- People adapt and shift to any grid style needed to gain maximum advantage
- *Note: Leaders usually have a dominant grid style used in most situations and a backup style that is reverted to when under pressure
- Role focus
- Performance occurs according to a system of selfish gain
- Leader uses any combination of the basic five styles for the purpose of personal advancement
- May be seen as ruthless and cunning
- May also be seen as adaptable and strategic
How does the style approach work
- Focus: Primarily a framework for assessing leadership as behaviour with a task and relationship dimension
- Overall scope: Offers a general means of assessing the behaviours of leaders
Strengths for Style Approach
- Style Approach marked a major shift in leadership research from exclusively trait focused to include behaviours and actions of leaders
- Broad range of studies on leadership style validates and gives credibility to the basic tenets of the approach
- At conceptual level, a leader’s style is composed of two major types of behaviours: task and relationship
- The style approach is heuristic – leaders can learn a lot about themselves and how they come across to others by trying to see their behaviours in light of the task and relationship dimensions
Criticisms of Style Approach
- Research has not adequately demonstrated how leaders’ styles are associated with performance outcomes
- No universal style of leadership that could be effective in almost every situation
- Implies that the most effective leadership style is HighHigh style (i.e., high task/high relationship); research finding support is limited
Application for Style Approach
- Many leadership training and development programs are designed along the lines of the style approach
- By assessing their own style, managers can determine how they are perceived by others and how they could change their behaviours to become more effective
- The style approach applies to nearly everything a leader does