Study Theme 6: Reckless credit and over-indebtedness Flashcards
NCAs new two fold approach
❖ Prevention of reckless lending and over-indebtedness,
and
❖ Alleviation of over-indebtedness
❖ EXCLUSIONS:
❖ Measures not applicable if:
❖ Consumer is juristic person
❖ Provisions regarding reckless credit not applicable if:
➢ Pawn transaction;
➢ Incidental credit agreement;
➢ Temporary increase credit limit under credit
facility
Reasoanble steps in which credit providers must take before enetring into a credit agreement
They must take reasonable steps to assess:
➢ Proposed consumer’s understanding and appreciation of risks, costs, rights and obligations;
➢ Proposed consumer’s debt re-payment history as consumer under credit agreements;
➢ If there is a commercial purpose for applying for credit, the reasonable estimated future revenue flow
from the business purpose; and
➢ Proposed consumer’s (and family and household
member’s) existing financial means, prospects and
obligations [Regulation 23A of NCA applies to this
one].
❖ Regulation 23
Regulation 23A
Assessment Requirements:
Fair and Objective: The assessment must be conducted in a fair and unbiased manner.
Compliance with Regulation 23A: The assessment must adhere to the specific guidelines and criteria outlined in Regulation 23A.
❖ Objective of Reg
Assess whether the consumer:
❖ Can afford the proposed credit agreement, or
❖ An increase in the limit of an existing credit agreement.
To determine this, the credit provider must assess the
consumer’s:
1. Discretionary Income
2. Mininum living expense
- Discretionary income
❖ Amount available to pay the credit instalments.
❖ Includes gross monthly income, less statutory deductions, less necessary living expenses and less
other committed payment obligations.
- Minimum living expenses
❖ Credit provider must deduct prescribed fixed amounts of
living expenses e.g. food, transport etc.
❖ Unless convinced otherwise that such expenses are the
prescribed amount.
❖ Regulation provides remedies to consumers who are
aggrieved by the outcome of the affordability
assessment
❖ ABSA Bank v Kganakga
❖ The court held that with regard to the proposed
consumer’s understanding and appreciation of risks,
costs, rights and obligations,
❖ The following factors are to be considered by the courts:
❖ Firstly, the consumer’s state of mind relating to their
understanding and appreciation of the risks, costs, rights
and obligations under the agreement.
❖ Second is the consumers previous experience and
behaviour as a consumer under credit agreements.
❖ Third, the finances of the proposed consumer at the time
of the application
❖ Standard Bank v Panayiotts
❖ Case dealt with the meaning of “financial means,
prospects and obligations”.
❖ Held that: Financial means include income and expenses
as well as assets and liabilities.
❖ Prospects must include prospects of improving the
consumer’s financial position, such as increases, and
even liquidating assets
❖ Truworths Ltd v Minister of Trade and Industry
❖ Court set aside Regulation 23A(4) and
❖ Held that it was unfair to require unbanked and informal
traders to produce financial statements in order to
validate their gross income.
❖ Mainly because most of them cannot comply with this
requirement.
Credit provider’s
complete defence
❖ NCA places obligation on consumer to answer credit
provider’s request for information, fully and truthfully.
❖ This is where credit provider obtains the information to do
the assessment.
❖ Defence:
❖ Credit provider has a defence against an allegation of
reckless lending if consumer failed to answer fully and
truthfully.
❖ According to Court/Tribunal the credit provider’s ability to
do a proper assessment was materially affected by this
failure.
Forms of reckless
credit
❖ There are 3 forms of reckless credit
❖ Form is determined by credit provider’s assessment
obligation and what happens thereafter
The credit provider’s obligation involves:
Conducting Thorough Assessments: Ensuring that consumers can afford the credit.
Reassessing When Necessary: Re-evaluating the consumer’s financial situation if it changes significantly before granting additional credit.
Failure to meet these obligations can result in reckless credit, harming consumers and potentially leading to legal consequences for the credit provider.
❖ First form of reckless credit
❖ Failure to conduct assessment at time credit agreement
was made or at time, the amount in terms of agreement is
increased.
❖ The mere failure to conduct compulsory assessment
constitutes recklessness.
❖ Is irrelevant whether consumer could afford the credit or
not at time of conclusion.