Study design and summarising data Flashcards
What are RTCs?
Randomised Controlled Trials
* Intervention study
* Choice of treatment/intervention allocated randomly
* Typically randomised to new vs current or placebo treatment
* ‘Gold standard’ in research studies
Why are Randomised Controlled Trials random ?
- Ensures patients’ characteristics don’t affect which treatmentthey receive
- Unbiased
- Treatment groups balanced
- Any differences in outcome can be attributed to treatment received
- Fair test of efficacy
- Usually use computer-generated random list
How does Blinding in Random Controlled Trials take place?
Why?
- Treatment is concealed from either (single) or both (double) patient and assessor
- Reduce bias e.g. conscious or unconscious bias
- Double-blind: need placebo drug or sham treatment, not always possible
- Randomisation makes blindness possible
What is the analysis in randomisation controlled trials?
Intention-to-treat: analyse in randomised groups, even if don’t comply or if switch treatments
* Ensures balance remains - VERY IMPORTANT
* Fair test of offer of treatment
Per protocol analysis sometimes used as well , particularly if a large number of patients are not managed as planned.
Limitiations of Randomized controlled trials
- Can be expensive and difficult to organise
- Some interventions are impossible or unethical to randomise to
e.g. impact of lead on children’s intelligence
What are Cohort studies?
- Observational study- no intervention
- Subjects observed in natural state (real world)
- Investigates causes or factors associated with disease (or condition)
- Selects group of healthy individuals
- Follow-up to monitor disease state and possible risk factors over time
- Disease state (e.g. yes/no) according to risk factor status (e.g.smoking yes/no)
- Usually prospective (but retrospective designs may be used)
What are Advantages of cohort studies
- Data is collected prospectively, so estimates are less likely to be biased than those from a case-control
- RCTs can only investigate potential benefits for ethical reasons but cohort studies can investigate potential harm
- Imbalance between exposed and unexposed can be corrected in the analysis
- Cohort studies can look at exposure to treatment and harm
- eg impact of lead on children’s intelligence
What is the design of a weighted sample study?
- Subjects selected from large population on basis of outcome of interest
- All cases and a random sample of controls are included
- Full data collected on selected sample
What is advantages of weighted sample study?
- Can be carried out prospectively
- More cases from a smaller sample
- Greater power & accuracy without excessive cost
Disadvantages of a weighted sample study
- Sampling frame needed to identify weighted sample
- Analysis must correct for sample weighting
- Rarely used ( need to get a statition on board)
What is case-control studies
- Observational study - no intervention
- Subjects observed in natural state (real world)
- Investigates causes or factors associated with disease (or condition)
- Selects group with disease: ‘cases’
- Choose comparator group without disease: ‘controls’
- Compare cases and controls with respect to possible risk factors
- Usually retrospective
What are the limitations of case-control studies?
- Choice of control group affects comparison
- Data reported by subjects or from records - usually
retrospective so may be incomplete, inaccurate or biased
✓ BUT often quick to do and inexpensive!
✓ Evidence from case-control studies may be used in
planning further research
What are cross-sectional studies?
Observational study
* Subjects observed in natural state (real world)
* Collect data for each subject at one point in time only
* Similar to a cohort study, but without follow-up
What are cross-sectional studies useful?
Useful for:
* measuring prevalence of a disease/condition - e.g. % in population with asthma
* surveys of attitudes/views/behaviours - e.g. patient satisfaction, alcohol drinking
* Not useful for looking at cause & effect
Why summarise data?
- To monitor data quality
- To check for invalid or missing entries
- To describe characteristics of participants in a study
- e.g. 1st table in many research articles
- Before doing a complex analysis