Study 4 - Reverse Flashcards

1
Q
  • AST’s and UST’s
  • Hazardous waste management
  • Wastewater management
  • Hazardous waste site identification and remediation; and
  • Pollution prevention
A

Strong and consistent national standards would establish consensus with respect to such issues as:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  • Chief federal act responsible for the environment
    Governs the:
  • identification, assessment, and management of toxic substances; and
  • regulation and control of the discharge of these substances into the environment
A

Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The main legislative components in Ontario to protect and conserve the environment

EPA governs:
- The regulation of the discharge of contaminants
- Control, stop, remedial, and prevention orders
- The management of spills
- The management and disposal of hazardous waste

EBR governs:
- Public participation in environmental decision making
- Governmental accountability for provincial and territorial environmental decision making
- Access to the courts for private citizens; and
- Protection for employees who take action against environmental harm

A

Environmental Protection Act (EPA) & Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Actual loss from the natural, not the necessary, consequences of the subject of complaint; for example, specific payments for medical bills or car repairs. In third- party claims, it means the damages may be proved with documents.

Plaintiffs used to be required to show that a kind of special damage had occurred before they could sue. No longer the case.

A

Special Damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Liability imposed by a court or by a statute in the absence of fault when harm results from activities or conditions that are extremely dangerous, unnatural, hazardous, extraordinary, abnormal, or inappropriate

A

Strict Liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Means that every person identified as a polluter may be liable for the entire amount of the clean-up cost, regardless of how much that particular polluter contributed to the pollution

A

Joint and Several Liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Covers a loss that occurred before the insurance was purchased; covers liability for incidents related to the property or person not yet reported to an insurance company

A

Retroactive Liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  1. Minimal exposure businesses and professional services are unlikely to cause damage to the environment (stockbrokers, real estate agents, office buildings, retail electronic stores)
  2. Low-hazard businesses are not likely to cause significant environmental damage. Includes many construction and installation businesses, schools, motels, most food processing companies, department stores.
  3. Medium-hazard businesses may sometimes cause significant environmental damage. Both the complexity and magnitude of operations may affect the level of risk and exposure. Businesses at this level include drycleaners, most farming operations, medical labs, manufacturers of cement and concrete, golf courses, auto repair garages.
  4. High-hazard businesses can be expected to cause significant environmental damage. Businesses in this category include manufacturers of pulp and paper, petrochemicals, gases, pesticides, fertilizers, gas bars and service stations, fuel dealers and gas companies
A

Environmental Hazard Classification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  1. Copies of available fire insurance plans, inspection reports, and property plans of the site
  2. Analysis of potential contaminants on site by engineers using the historical data
A

Historical Environmental Information Report System (HEIRS) provides 2 levels of service

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  • Property uses at various times
  • Above and belowground storage tanks
  • Transformers
  • Electrical rooms; and
  • Other details that may point to an environmental exposure
A

Researching the sources of historical information will usually identify:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Environmental Audit
- Non-intrusive
- Useful to issue policy
- Systematic obtaining and evaluating of evidence

Phase I ESA
- Non-intrusive
- Useful to issue policy
- Determines likelihood of contamination being present on site

Phase II ESA
- Intrusive
- Less useful to underwriters
- Identifies and quantifies the nature and extent of the contamination

Phase III ESA
- Involves remediation planning
- Remediation work not always necessary even if a contaminant is found

Phase IV and V ESA’s
- Both deal with site-specific remediation plans

A

Different Environmental Studies (Audits/Assessments)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  • Identify environmental regulations, standards, and guidelines that apply
  • Assess whether the company is in compliance with the regulations, standards, and guidelines
  • Monitor compliance
  • Appoint an individual to apply corporate environmental policy and prepare regular reports to a senior office and the board of directors
  • Implement environmental control practices
  • Improve existing systems
  • Train staff to ensure environmental policy is effectively applied
  • Prepare an emergency response plan
A

Diligence Checklist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  • Allows the court to take into account what an insured reasonably expects to be covered
  • The court will look at the wording, what the parties intended, and construe any ambiguities in favour of the insured
  • The intent is to seek a fair interpretation of the policy even when certain provisions appear to negate coverage
A

Reasonable Expectations Doctrine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  • Harmonization of environmental legislative standards
  • More details measurement tools for underwriters
  • Predictable and reasonable court decisions
A

3 circumstances for insuring pollution liability successfully

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  • Waste materials
  • Raw materials
  • Good in process
  • Fuels
  • Finished products
A

Potential Pollutants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  • Chemical storage areas
  • Transportation routes
  • Drainage paths
  • Sewers
  • Spillways
  • Chemical conveyances
  • Roofs
  • Parking lots
  • Outdoor process areas
A

Materials identified as potentially hazardous must be properly examined. A “map” can be prepared to show:

17
Q
  • Use deductibles
  • Provide sub-limits of coverage
  • Impose aggregate limits of coverage
  • Make defence costs subject to policy limits
  • Use claims-made wordings
A

5 ways to limit pollution exposures

18
Q
  1. Industrial process in use or the industry involved
  2. Number of locations to be insured
  3. Company’s Revenue (the greater the revenue, the greater the risk)
A

3 Rating Factors of particular importance to pollution exposures

19
Q
  • Safer, more predictable product for the volatile environmental insurance market
  • Allows insurers to be more confident in risk-taking, pricing, and offering better coverage
  • Occurrence-based policies may lead to potentially serious long-tail liability exposures
A

Claims-made form for pollution risks

20
Q

A specialized insurance policy that covers liability and sometimes cleanup costs associated with pollution

A

Environmental Impairment Liability (EIL) Insurance

21
Q
  • S&A pollution events
  • Gradual pollution events
  • Offsite clean-up costs
  • Prior acts
  • Shareholders, officers, employees, directors, or other members of elected boards
  • Damages involving noise or other sensory phenomena
A

No standard coverage form for EIL but typically includes coverage for: