Study 1-9: Narrative practice questions Flashcards
What can happen when insurance fraud is left unmanaged?
- Fraudulent acts may increase in frequency
- Fraudulent acts may become more severe
- More participants will be involved in fraudulent acts, including a greater proportion of participants with a criminal history
- Collusion in fraudulent acts and corruption will increase across participants and stakeholders, including insurer employees
- Manipulation and deception of insurance consumers will increase
- Corruption and coercion incidents will increase
- A higher incidence of fraudulent acts will be accompanied by intimidation and violence
What are the key fraud prevention strategies?
- Identification verification
- Negative thinking
- Intelligence
- Avoidance and severance
- Supplier prohibition
- Fraud history record
- Education
What are the key elements of fraud?
- Person or entity
- Deceit or falsehood
- Misrepresentation
- Material information or material facts
- Profit or gaining an unfair advantage
- Post-investigation conclusion
How is fraud against insurer defined?
- Creating a false document, intended to be issued by an insurer
- Altering a document issued by an insurer for profit
- Creating a false document, cheque, or instrument redeemable as payment and purported to be issued by an insurer
- Altering a document, cheque, or instrument redeemable as payment issued by an insurer
- Cashing or redeeming a false or altered document, cheque, or instrument redeemable as payment, issued or purported to be issued by an insurer
- Distributing insurer information or data to a person or entity without the insurer’s knowledge or consent
- Using or deploying software or other electronic means to disable operation of, or access to, a computer system or application containing an insurer’s data until a demand for a sum of money is paid in exchange for regaining control or access
What are some possible elements of coercion?
Coercion occurs when someone is
- forced to do something;
- led to believe or accept as true or valid what is false or invalid;
- requested to sign or acknowledge a misleading or incomplete document;
- discouraged or restrained from disclosing information;
- disadvantaged by disability or a language barrier, due to misrepresentation, false impression, trickery, threats, or blackmail;
- made timid, fearful, or frightened due to aggressive or threatening behaviour; or
- the recipient of an utterance or threat of bodily harm or death.
How does corruption appear in the insurance industry?
- Corruption represents a loss or deterioration of integrity of its participants.
- Participants are motivated by greed and an expectation or hope of return.
- Corruption also means the act of soliciting, offering, promising, giving, or receiving unearned favour, money, or any item of value in the course of business as a means to induce or influence a person’s judgment or conduct; a decision or outcome; business activity or revenue; or an unlawful act.
- Corrupt acts are directly linked to insurance fraud on two fronts: The return often represents opportunity for future fraudulent acts (for example, a lawyer receives cash from an injury treatment clinic that frequently submits exaggerated invoices to insurers). The deterioration of integrity is the result of an existing environment of prolonged, ineffective fraud management (for example, an insurer discovers two of its adjusters have been receiving gift cards from a construction contractor every time a claimant is referred to the contractor).
What are the pros and cons of civil proceedings as an enforcement option?
Pros
- The timing and scope of proceedings are controllable. There are no dependencies on external bodies as to when or how action will be taken.
- Costs of investigation can be added to the claim by the insurance business or organization initiating the proceeding.
- Resolution of a civil action can include agreement on a court order with specified conditions. Contraventions of court-ordered conditions are always enforceable in the future, which can be an excellent fraud prevention tool.
Cons
- Upfront legal costs (internal or external) are incurred to see civil proceedings through to the desired conclusion.
- There can be circumstances where it is not practical to recover damages or costs if the defendant cannot pay.
- There is significant risk of industry reputational harm to situations where civil proceedings initiated by an insurer are withdrawn or no longer pursued because of mounting legal costs. This can quickly result in the reversal of the intended effect at the outset of proceedings because knowledge of the withdrawal empowers the defendant (or others who are likeminded) to continue their behaviour.
If an insurance business or organization must initiate an enforcement complaint, what are the principles that guide the decision?
- Personal safety
- Threat of deliberate loss
- Prosecution of a concluded case with deterrent value
- Public interest in reporting unenforceable complaint cases
- Additional evidence to bring a case to conclusion
Describe how professional regulatory bodies are created and how they function in the insurance industry.
If a profession is authorized by the government to self-regulate, legislation sets out a framework and delegates legal authority to that profession to create its own regulatory body to protect the public interest by setting and enforcing accreditation and practice standards.
The regulatory bodies then
- develop and enforce conduct rules to protect the public by ensuring that services from members of the profession are provided ethically;
- provide a mechanism for the public, including insurers, to complain about the practices and conduct of a member of the profession;
- provide a process to investigate and, if necessary, discipline any member of a profession who fails to meet professional standards of practice; and
- create rules to remove a member from the profession.
What are the privacy principles for insurance fraud management?
- An insurance fraud management program should document baseline principles and practices relating to privacy (including the collection, use, and disclosure of information) and investigative practices.
- All privacy laws must be obeyed.
- When used during an investigation, surveillance should only be considered in cases determined to be potential fraud, not fraud risk.
- Information that identifies a person or entity should not be retained or stored in any case file, data repository, or technology used for the purpose of future fraud management in circumstances where that information was used in a case of fraud risk that was never analyzed or investigated (or analyzed but not determined to be potential fraud).
- An Internet Protocol (IP) address constitutes personal information. It can identify a host on a specific network or subnet, and thus be vulnerable to attack by hackers.
Describe legal privilege along with its two types. How is legal privilege used in the insurance industry?
Claiming legal privilege in a legal dispute is a way to resist disclosure of information that could weaken a case or prove advantageous to the opposing party. An insurer conducting an investigation will sometimes rely on legal privilege to protect the disclosure of information obtained during an investigation into potential fraud.
There are two types of legal privilege:
- Solicitor–client privilege (the protection of confidential communication between a lawyer and a client)
- Litigation privilege (the protection a lawyer has in collecting privileged information to prepare a case for or during litigation)
During claims handling, common insurer practices to protect disclosure of an investigation of a claim using litigation privilege include
- retaining a lawyer;
- ensuring all investigative activity is organized by the lawyer;
- addressing or copying investigative and expert reports to the lawyer;
- labelling all communications, documents, and reports as “privileged and confidential”; and
- having the lawyer manage and retain the relevant portion of the claim file rather than the insurer.
How are the categories of policy fraud and falsified claim fraud vulnerable to bad faith? Provide some examples.
The categories of policy fraud and falsified claim fraud are vulnerable to bad faith because the allegations (and management of them) involve both parties to an insurance contract that are owed utmost good faith. Examples of bad faith in the context of insurance fraud include the following:
- Unsubstantiated conclusions of fraud
- Actions that are consistent with a premature determination of fraudulent behaviour
- Cancelling or voiding a policy due to suspicion
- Denying a claim based on misrepresented information
- Using a computer-generated fraud score to decide the negative outcome of a claim. It should be noted that most fraud scores are not visible to the adjuster. Most claims software do not share a fraud score unless it hits a threshold. When it does, only then can the adjuster view it.
- Making a fraud determination based on an incomplete investigation
- Coercing an insured during an investigation
- Offering a claim settlement amount substantially less than the claim is worth based on an element of unproven fraud or suspicion
- Lack of fairness or unjustifiable delays in conducting a fraud investigation
What information may require further investigation during the insurance application process?
An intermediary may require more details from the potential client if he or she
- Does not live or work nearby
- Lives in an area not consistent with income or occupation
- Has lived at his or her home for less than six months
- Requires high limits of coverage that are not consistent with income or lifestyle
- Works in an automobile-related business
- Has a record of claims and/or convictions
- Has had payment issues with a previous insurer
- Is evasive about details pertaining to employment or the subject of insurance
What financial red flags may an intermediary spot during the application process?
Intermediaries may consider it a red flag if the potential client
- is in debt;
- has a prior bankruptcy;
- is self-employed or unemployed; or
- is unable to verify his or her business or location.
Other red flags are if the client’s business shows
- decreasing sales, or
- a trend of decreasing profits.
In terms of behaving ethically, what are intermediaries’ duties to clients?
In dealing with clients, intermediaries must
- provide the coverage best suited to the clients’ needs;
- not be swayed by remunerative gain;
- not take advantage of clients’ lack of knowledge or inexperience;
- not speak ill or put in a negative light any industry partner, associate, or competition;
- hold information in strict confidence; and
- competently perform services undertaken, which requires them to be well educated and indicates the need for continuing education.