Students in Research Flashcards
What were the major contributions of the Declaration of Helsinki?
- Research with humans should be based on the results from laboratory and animal experimentation.
- Research protocols should be reviewed by an independent committee prior to initiation.
- Informed consent from research participants is necessary.
- Research should be conducted by medically/scientifically qualified individuals.
- Risks should not exceed benefits.
What is the Nuremberg Code, and what is its major premise?
It was developed following the Nuremberg Military Tribunal, which judged human experimentation conducted by the Nazis. It encompasses many of the basic principles governing the ethical code of human subjects research today. It states that “the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential” and it further explains the details implied in this requirement: capacity to consent, freedom from coercion, no penalty for withdrawal, and comprehension of the risks and benefits involved.
What is the Common Rule?
Subpart A of the policy for the protection of human subjects. It provides for the basic foundation of the Institutional Review Boards. This Federal Policy has been codified by the federal agencies that conduct, support, or otherwise regulate human subjects research.
The Common Rule is a short name for “The Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects” and was adopted by a number of federal agencies in 1991.
The Common Rule applies to human subjects research conducted, supported or otherwise subject to regulation by the VA.
The Common Rule:
• Describes the types of research subject to regulation
• Defines key terms such as research, human subject and
minimal risk
• Requires a written assurance of compliance with the
common rule
• Sets forth requirements for an Institutional Review Board’s
(IRB) membership, authority, review procedures, records
and criteria for approval
• Lists the general requirements for informed consent
What are the 3 principles outlined in the Belmont Report?
Respect for persons (autonomy), beneficence, justice
What are the requirements for IRB composition?
At least five members from relevant academic disciplines or experiences, at least one member must not be affiliated with the institution. It must be diverse and must include at least one member whose primary concern is in a scientific area and one who is not a scientist. Must be diverse in terms of race, gender, cultural backgrounds, and include members from the community.
What is the responsibility of the IRB?
To review and oversee human subjects research whereby they protect the rights and welfare of human subjects by ensuring equitable subject selection, assuring adequate informed consent, assessing and minimizing risks, and maintaining privacy and confidentiality.
To review all projects involving human subjects for compliance with institutional policies and state, local, and federal laws, as well as the ethical principles contained in the Belmont Report (respect for persons, beneficence, justice).
What is exempt review?
Exempt research is research with human subjects that generally involves no more than minimal risk. It is “exempt” from the Common Rule. And exempt research project does not require ongoing review by the IRB, unless the project is amended in such a way that it no longer meets the exemption criteria.
What are the requirements for a research project to be exempt?
- Research conducted in established or commonly accepted educational settings, involving normal educational practices.
- Research involving the use of educational tests, survey procedures, interview procedures, or observation of public behavior.
- Research involving the collection or study of existing data, documents, records, pathological or diagnostic specimens, if these sources are publicly available or if the information is recorded by the investigator in such a manner that subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects.
- Research and demonstration projects which are conducted by or subject to the approval of department or agency heads, and which are designed to study, evaluate, or otherwise examine [particulars].
- Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer acceptance studies.
What is an expedited review?
If the research presents no more than minimal risk, the IRB may determine it qualifies for an expedited review. The expedited review covers the same elements as a full/convened committee review but can be conducted by the IRB chair or designated experienced reviewer rather than the whole convened committee.
What are the requirements for research project to be considered for an expedited review?
-Clinical studies of drugs and medical devices when one of the following conditions is met: research on drugs for which an investigational new drug application is not required; research on medical devices for which an investigational device exemption application is not required or the medical device is cleared/approved for marketing and the medical device is being used in accordance with its cleared/approved labeling.
-Collection of blood samples by finger stick, he’ll stick, your stick, or venipuncture from certain populations.
-Perspective collection of biological specimens for research purposes by noninvasive means.
-Collection of data through noninvasive procedures routinely employed in clinical practice, excluding procedures involving x-rays or microwaves. When medical devices are employed, they must be cleared/approved for marketing.
-Research involving materials that have been collected or will be collected solely for non-research purposes such as medical treatment or diagnosis.
-Collection of data from voice, video, digital, or image recordings made for research purposes.
Research on individual or group characteristics or behavior (such as research on perception, cognition, motivation, identity, language, communication, cultural beliefs or practices, and social behavior) or research employing survey, interview, oral history, focus group, program evaluation, human factor evaluation, or quality assurance methodologies.
Who conducts an expedited review?
The IRB chair or a designated experienced reviewer rather than the whole convened committee.
What is the definition of “research?”
A systematic investigation, including research development, testing, and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.
What is the definition of a “human subject?”
A living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains (1) data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or (2) identifiable private information.
What is meant by non-engagement in research?
This occurs when an institution’s employees or agents act as consultants on research but at no time obtain, receive, or possess identifiable private information, perform commercial services for the investigators, or inform prospective subjects about the availability of research.
Who completes the IRB application?
The student completes the IRB application under the guidance of her faculty advisor.