Structural MRI Flashcards

1
Q

What is a voxel with equal length, width and height called?

A

isotropic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3 planes of brain image

A
  • axial: dividing in superior and inferior
  • coronal: dividing in anterior and posterior
  • sagittal: dividing in left and right
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Motion artifacts

A
  • interindividual difference: people who move more in one image, also do so in another one
  • no relationship with age
  • women move less
  • higher motion -> lower gray matter volume estimates
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

classical lesion analysis - lesion-defined approach

A
  • behavioral performance of a group of patients with a common area of injury (e.g., DLPFC) compared to that of a control group / another patient group
  • good for assessing the functional roles of particular regions of interest
  • BUT: loss of information if ROI contains multiple subregions that each contribute to behavior
  • regions outside the ROI that are part of a distributed functional network may be overlooked
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

classical lesion analysis - behavior-defined approach

A
  • patients are grouped according to whether or not they show a specific behavioral deficit
  • lesion reconstructions are overlaid to find common areas and compared to lesion overlays from patients without the deficit
  • effective in identifying brain regions that may contribute to a cognitive skill
  • BUT: when behavioral data are continuous cut-off needed, information reflecting varying degrees of performance can be lost
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

voxel-wise lesion-symptom mapping

A
  • mass-univariate statistical analysis (akin to standard analysis techniques for fMRI)
  • does not require patients to be grouped by either lesion site or behavioral cutoff a priori
  • makes use of continuous behavioral and lesion information
  • voxel-by-voxel analysis
  • for each voxel, patients are categorized according to whether they did or did not have a lesion affecting that voxel
  • behavioral scores are then compared for these two groups, yielding a t statistic for each voxel
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Volumetry - manual segmentation (T1-weighted images)

A

pros:
- remains the gold standard
- ideal for delineating structures with intricate anatomy/multiple subregions
- well-suited for smaller studies with focused hypothesis
- biologically and anatomically meaningful

cons:
- labor-intense: impossible for large studies (> 1.000 scans)
- requires expert anatomical knowledge
- requires at least two blinded tracers to avoid bias
- intra-rater variability
- inter-rater variability
- inter-protocol variability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Volumetry - automated segmentation

A

pros:
- replaces manual segmentation for most applications
- substantially faster (large datasets)
- higher reliability
- standardized

cons
- Freesurfer can overestimate total hippocampal volumes
- problems with accurately detecting boundaries between hippocampus and neighboring structures
- differences in segmentation outcomes with regard to age effects and hemispheric asymmetry

However, agreement between manual and automated approaches is continuously improving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

automated segmentation in FSL FIRST

A

model-based segmentation of 15 subcortical structures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

FSL FIRST vs. FreeSurfer

A
  • relative difference between areas is the same
  • absolute volumes differ between software
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Whole-brain volumetry with FSL SIENA(X)

A
  • Software package for both single time point (cross-sectional) and two time point (longitudinal) analysis of brain change
  • particularly useful for the estimation of atrophy (volumetric loss of brain tissue)
  • brain volume normalized to skull
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Voxel-based morphometry 1

A
  • voxel-wise analysis of the local concentration of gray matter
  • characterizes local differences in gray matter topography, while discounting large scale differences in anatomy (relative concentration of gray matter structures in the spatially normalized images)
  • align images globally and compare GM likelihood at each voxel
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

voxel-based morphometry - segmentation into tissue classes

A
  • often combined with intensity normalization
  • classification commonly combination of intensity-based clustering informed by spatial priors
  • cleaning step (remove non-brain classes)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

voxel-based morphometry - normalization

A
  • linear vs. non-linear
  • linear: manipulation (rotation, translation) is applied equally to all parts of the image
  • non-linear: manipulation is applied locally (i.e., different changes to different parts)
  • choice of template matters (MNI305, MNI152, …)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

voxel-based morphometry - (spatial) smoothing

A
  • smoothing makes each voxel more similar to its neighbors (weighted means)
  • typical smoothing kernels are 4-16 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM)
  • parametric tests assume Gaussianity of residuals, smoothing helps satisfy this assumption
  • spatial normalization is not perfect, and smoothing helps accommodate inter-individual differences in local anatomy
  • smoothing makes the analysis sensitive to the kernel size, such that very small differences are disregarded
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

London taxi drivers

A

Trainees who successfully acquired an internal spatial representation of London showed selective increase in gray matter density in posterior hippocampi with concomitant changes to their memory profile

17
Q

partial volume effect

A
  • higher likelihood of i.e. gray matter in one voxel, but you don’t know why
  • one voxel is only one number, even though there are different substances in there, you don’t know why there is more gray matter there
  • factors: folding, thickness, misclassification, misregistration
18
Q

human cerebral cortex

A
  • outer layer of gray matter
  • 1-5mm thick
  • highly folded
  • 2-dimensional, embedded in 3D
19
Q

cortical thickness - cortical surface model (FreeSurfer)

A
  • triangle mesh (“finite element”)
  • ~ 300 000 triangles
  • point of triangle intersections: vertex
  • surface of the triangles: face
  • XYZ coordinates at each vertex
  • area, distance, curvature, thickness, …
  • cortical thickness estimation: shortest distance between white-matter surface and pial (gray-matter) surface
20
Q

cortical thickness - pros and cons

A

pros:
- automated, continuous, whole cortex
- processing and measurement respect cortical topology
- direct, biologically meaningful measure in millimeters
- surface-registration may increase sensitivity

cons:
- heavy post-processing (6-24 hours/scan)
- dependent on classification
- manual corrections often necessary
- limited to (neo)cortex

21
Q

shape-related measures of brain morphology - gyrification index (GI)

A
  • estimates the amount of cortex buried within sulcal folds
  • can be estimated by Free Surfer
22
Q

shape-related measures of brain morphology - regional fractal dimensionality (FD)

A
  • measure of ‘structural complexity’
  • quantifies how irregular the shape of an object is
  • yields a ‘broken’ topological dimension, typically between 2 and 3