Structural MRI Flashcards

1
Q

What is structural MRI dataset?

A

It is a matrix with dimensions x,y,z

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a voxel? What does it represent?

A

A voxel is the single entry in a 3D image (cf. pixel). It represents a single cell in that matrix

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is an isotropic voxel?

A

A voxel that measures the same in each direction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What (anatomical) planes are used in MRI?

A
  • axial (horizontal, transverse, divides into superior and inferior sections)
  • coronal (frontal, divides into dorsal and ventral sections)
  • sagittal (longitudinal, divides into right and left sections)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the most common resolution in contemporary MRI?

A

contemporary acquisition resolution is ~1 mm3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What two approaches are there in classic lesion analysis?

A
  • ‘lesion-defined’ approach
  • ‘behavior-defined’ approach
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the princples of ‘lesion-defined’ approach? What are its pros and cons?

A

behavioral performance of a group of patients with a common area of injury сompared to that of a control group / another patient group
* + good for assessing the functional roles of particular regions of interest
* - loss of information if ROI contains multiple subregions that each contribute to behavior
* - regions outside the ROI that are part of a distributed functional network may be overlooked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the princples of ‘behaviour-defined’ approach? What are its pros and cons?

A

patients are grouped according to whether or not they show a specific behavioral deficit
lesion reconstructions are overlaid to find common areas and compared to lesion overlays from patients without the deficit
* + effective in identifying brain regions that may contribute to a cognitive skill
* - when behavioral data are continuous → cut-off needed → information reflecting varying degrees of performance can be lost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is an alternative to classic analysis? What are its principles and pros?

A

Voxel-wise lesion-symptom mapping:
* mass-univariate (voxel-by-voxel) statistical analysis
* for each voxel, patients are categorized according to whether they did or did not have a lesion affecting that voxel
* behavioral scores are then compared for these two groups, yielding a t-statistic for each voxel

Pros:
* does not require patients to be grouped by either lesion site or behavioral cutoff a priori
* makes use of continuous behavioral and lesion information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are existing approaches in segmentation?

A

Manual segmentation
* ITK-Snap (hand-selected regions)
Automated segmentation
* FSL FIRST (subcortical)
* FreeSurfer (subcortical+global)
* FSL SIENA(X) (global tissue volumes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are contemporary applications of structural MRI?

A
  • Lesion-Symptom Mapping
  • Volumetry
  • Voxel-based morphometry
  • Cortical thickness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the pros and cons of manual segmentation?

A

Pros:
* Remains the gold standard
* Ideal for delineating structures with intricate anatomy/multiple subregions
* Well-suited for smaller studies with focused hypothesis
* Biologically and anatomically meaningful

Cons:
* Labor-intense: impossible for large studies (> 1.000 scans)
* Requires expert anatomical knowledge
* Requires at least two blinded tracers to avoid bias
* Intra-rater variability
* Inter-rater variability
* Inter-protocol variability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the pros and cons of automated segmentation?

A

Pros:
* Replaces manual segmentation for most applications
* Substantially faster (large datasets)
* Higher reliability (no intra-rater and inter-rater variability) — you measure the same result in different trials
* Validity — you measure what you want to measure
* Standardized
* Agreement between manual and automated approaches is continuously improving

Cons (evidence from single studies):
* Freesurfer can overestimate total hippocampal volumes
* Problems with accurately detecting boundaries between hippocampus and neighboring structures
* Differences in segmentation outcomes with regard to age effects and hemispheric asymmetry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is whole-brain volumetry with FSL SIENA(X) particularly useful for?

A
  • both single-time-point (cross-sectional) and two-time-point (longitudinal) analysis of brain change
  • particularly useful for the estimation of atrophy (volumetric loss of brain tissue)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The volume of which brain tissues can be assessed with FSL SIENA(X)

A
  • Whole-brain volume
  • Peripheral gray matter volume
  • Gray matter volume
  • Ventricular CSF volume
  • White matter volume
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are new methodologies in structural MRI?

A

Existing methods are based on notion of size (volume, thickness), new methologies are trying to move to shape measuring

=> Shape-related measures of brain morphology:
* local gyrification index (GI): how much of the cortex is buried within sulcal folds
* regional fractal dimensionality (FD): measures structural complexity, how irregular the shape of an object is
* brain shape development in infants

17
Q

What are the features of cortical surface models?

A
  • Triangle mesh (“finite element”) cortex split in ~ 300 000 triangles
  • Point of triangle intersections: vertex
  • Surface of the triangles: face
  • XYZ coordinates at each vertex
  • area, distance, curvature, thickness, …
18
Q

What are the pros and cons of cortical thickness estimation with FreeSurfer?

A

Pros:
* automated, continuous, whole cortex
* processing and measurement respect cortical topology
* direct, biologically meaningful measure in millimeters
* surface-registration may increase sensitivity

Cons:
* heavy post-processing (6-24 hours/scan)
* dependent on classification
* manual corrections often necessary
* limited to (neo)cortex

19
Q

What models of the human cortex are there?

A
  • MRI →
  • Cortical surface models with all gyri and sulci →
  • inflated cortex image (sulci are brought to the surface and can be mapped) →
  • flattened, completely normalised cortex image
20
Q

What is characteristical about the human cerebal cortex?

A
  • it is an outer layer of gray matter
  • it is 1-5mm thick
  • it is highly folded
  • it is 2-dimensional, but embedded in 3 dimensions
21
Q

How is cortical thickness estimated?

A

It is the shortest distance between white matter surface and pial surfaces

22
Q

What diseases lead to cortical thinning?

A

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD): brain disorders that are characterized by a degeneration of frontal and temporal lobes
* Behavioral changes
* Speech and language impediments
* Parkinson-like motor symptoms

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

23
Q

What diseases are characterised by change in the brain volume?

A
  • Neuromyelitis optica: WM volume is decreased
  • Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: cortical brain loss, reduced hippocampus volume

Ofc, also, AD, PD, HD, MS

24
Q

What is voxel-based morphometry? How is it implemented?

A
  • voxel-wise analysis of the local concentration of gray matter
  • characterizes local differences in gray matter topography, while discounting large-scale differences in anatomy
  • align images globally and compare GM likelihood at each voxel
25
Q

What are necessary steps in MRI processing?

A

Segmentation (into GM, WM, CSF):
* often combined with intensity normalization
* classification commonly combination of intensity-based clustering informed by spatial priors
* removing non-brain classes
* intensity distribution (from T1 scans) based clustering informed by spatial priors

Normalisation (from native space to standard space): linear vs. non-linear; is based on a template

Smoothing:
* makes each voxel more similar to its neighbors (weighted means)
* smoothing kernels are 4-16 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM)
* smoothing helps satisfy the assumption of Gaussianity of residuals
* helps accommodate inter-individual differences in local anatomy
* makes the analysis sensitive to the kernel size, such that very small differences are disregarded

26
Q

What are some common types of interpretational uncertainty?

A
  1. not detecting a folding
  2. wrong estimation of thickness
  3. misclassification: segmentation of brain tissue types
  4. misregistration