Strict Liability Flashcards

1
Q

Prima facie case of strict liability

A

1) the nature of the defendant’s activity imposes an absolute duty to make safe
2) the dangerous aspects of the activity was the actual and proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury
3) plaintiff suffered damage to person or property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Liability for animals

A

1) an owner is strictly liable for reasonably foreseeable damage done by a trespass of his animals.
2) an owner is strictly liable to licensees and invitees for injuries caused by wild animals.
3) an owner is not strictly liable for injuries caused by domestic animals unless he has knowledge of that particular animal’s dangerous propensities that are not common to the species.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Abnormally dangerous activities

A

Two requirements for finding an activity to be abnormally dangerous:

1) activity must create a foreseeable risk of serious harm even when reasonable care is exercised by all actors; and
2) activity is not a matter of common usage in the community.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Scope of duty owed in strict liability cases

A

The duty owed is the absolute duty to make safe the abnormally dangerous characteristics of that animal or activity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Defenses to strict liability

A

In contributory negligence states contributory negligence is no defense if plaintiff has failed to realize the danger or guard against it.

It is a defense if plaintiff knew the danger and his unreasonable conduct was a very cause of the harm for the wild animal or abnormally dangerous activity.

Assumption of the risk is a good defense to strict liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Additional elements to prove products liability

A

1) defect

2) existence of the defect when the product left defendant’s control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Types of defects

A

1) manufacturing defects
2) design defects
3) inadequate warnings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Manufacturing defect

A

If a product emerges from manufacturing different and more dangerous than the products that were properly made it has a manufacturing defect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Design defect

A

When all products of the same line have dangerous propensities they may be found to have a design defect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Proving a manufacturing defect

A

For a manufacturing defect defendant will be liable if plaintiff can show that the product failed to perform as safely as an ordinary consumer would expect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Proving a design defect

A

For a design defect plaintiff usually must show that the defendant could have made the product safer without serious impact on the products price or utility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Government safety standards

A

A product’s noncompliance with government safety standards establishes that it is defective while compliance with safety standards is evidence but not conclusive that the product is not defective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Unavoidably unsafe product

A

Manufacturers will not be held liable for some dangerous products, like knives, if the danger is apparent and there is no safer way to make the product.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Existence of defect when product left defendant’s control

A

This will be inferred if the product moved through normal channels of distribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Products liability based on negligence

A

Prima facie case is the same as negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Products liability based on strict tort liability

A

Prima facie case:

1) strict duty owed by commercial supplier of a product
2) production of or sale of a defective product
3) actual proximate cause
4) damages

17
Q

Who can sue under strict tort liability

A

Users consumers and bystanders can sue.

For liability to attach the product must reach plaintiff without substantial alteration.

Strict products liability applies only to products, not to services.

18
Q

Two warranties that allow for suit by a buyer against the seller

A

Warranty of merchantability

Warranty of fitness for a particular purpose

19
Q

What are domestic animals

A

Farm animals are considered domestic animals

20
Q

Duty of care of doctors to pregnant women

A

Doctors of a pregnant women owe duty to both mother and child not to act negligently.