Stress Flashcards
Physiological measure: recording devices and sample tests
Recording devices fMRI scans - oxygen in blood flow in brain PET scans - tracer GSR - sweat ECG - heart rate variability
Wang et al
Sample test: blood, urine, sweat
Evans and Wener
Describe Wang et al
- lab experiment, repeated measure
- high, low stress task (mental arithmetic tassks in fMRI)
- to determine whether stress tasks were valid:
- used physiological measures
heart rate and salivary cortisol - psychological measure
self report of stress and anxiety (1-9 scale)
all measures showed an increase for the low stress task, higher increase for high stress task, showing the stress tasks were valid
Causes of stress
P1 - workplace stress, Chandola et al
P2 - life event, Holmes & Rahe
P3 - type A, Friedman & Rosenman
Aim and procedure of Chandola et al
- biological, behavioural factors link work stress with CHD
- longtidinal
- accumulation of work stress = higher chances of developing CHD?
Data was collected about
work stress, behavioural risk factors (e.g. poor diet, smoking)
metabolic syndrome (e.g. high blood sugar, excess body fat)
heart rate variability
morning rise in cortisol (stress hormone)
incidence of CHD.
Findings from Chandola et al
- association was stronger among participants aged under 50.
- high work stress, low physical activity, poor diet, and lower heart rate variability.
- higher morning rise in cortisol.
Conclusion: Work stress may be one factor for levels of CHD among working-age populations, which can be seen through its impact on health behaviours as well as the neuroendocrine stress pathways.
Evaluate Chandola
Strengths:
- large sample
- longitudinal
Weaknesses:
-Can’t prove a cause and effect relationship, solely correlational.
Cultural Bias, since it’s London based.
Describe Friedman and Rosenman
- to see whether people who seem to be susceptible to CHD have similar personalities
- self report, questions in irritating way
- behavioural/observational data, categorised A or B
- sample developed CHD 70% from type A
Important to develop behavioural modification programme, reduce type A behaviour, reduce risk of CHD
Evaluate Friedman and Rosenman
- validity
- cultural bias
Describe Holmes and Rahe
- use SRRS
- 43 life events, amount of adjustment needed
- LCU 11-100, marriage = 50, compare
- death of spuse 100, minor violations in law 11
cumulative, if happened more than once within last 12 month, x no. of occurance - 150 or less=good, 30%
- 150-299, 50%
- 300 or more, 80%
Describe Evans and Wener
- field exp, commuting to work
- car density and seat density
- physiological: cortisol in saliva, psychologycal: mood
- stressful, density not associated, seating density is
- individual spacing among persons that leads to personal space invasion is a more important environmental condition than density
Essay: sources of stress
P1: GAS model causes of stress P2: work P3: life events P4: personality
Essay: measures of stress
P1: Physiological measure examples
P2: Wang et al, Evans and wener
P3: Psychological measure examples
P4: Method used in Holmes, Friedman
Evaluate physiological measures
- objective
- quantatitive
- time consuming
- validity (technological issues)
Evaluate psychological measures
- psychometric
- application (diagnose, understand, prevent)
- social desirability bias
- validity (individual differences)
Evaluate Evans and Wener
- application
- validity
- reductionist (only two measures)
- volunteer sample