Stress Flashcards
What is a stressor?
A stressor is when the stimulus which is perceived to be beyond the persons ability to cope.
What is Stress?
Stress is when the perceived demand of the environment are greater than their perceived ability to cope.
What is acute stress?
This is a short term or temporary stressor e.g Mock Exams
What is a chronic stressor?
This is a long term or permanent stressor e.g having a very demanding job
How do our bodies cope with stress?
Acute Stressor= SAM system is activated
Chronic Stressor= HPA axis is activated
The stages of stress response
- The situation is appraised and is considered to be beyond what the person feels that they can cope with a stressful event.
- This the causes the hypothalamus to be alerted
- If the hypothalamus decides the stress is acute then it activates the SAM but if it thinks it’s Chronic it activates the HPA Axis
Outline the pituitary-adrenal system (HPA AXIS).
This is when the hypothalamus activates the pituitary gland which secretes ATCH hormones into the blood. This is detected by the adrenal cortex and causes the release of glucocorticoids, glucose and cortisol to be released into the liver, this leads to the release of glycogen into glucose.
Outline the sympathomedullary pathway(SAM SYSTEM).
Sympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system sends neuron messages to the adrenal medulla which causes the secretion of adrenaline and nor-adrenaline into the blood, this is detected by receptors on the organs and causes them to stimulate in form of the fight or flight response.
Consequences of the SAM System
- Thinning of blood vessels
- Consequently Heart Disease
- Cardiovascular System to suffer wear and tear due to constant activation
Consequences of Chronic Stress
- Cortisol and ACTH cause a reduction in the number of lymphocytes being produced
- Cortisol produced could explain why stress related illnesses worsen over time as cortisol levels build up
Outline Research into acute stress and the immune system
Kiecolt-Glaser et al (1984)
Method
They took blood samples from 75 student volunteers
1. One month before examinations (control reading)
2. On the first day of their exams (stress reading).
They also completed a questionnaire to assess their psychiatric state, their level of loneliness and number of life events.
Results
In the stressed condition, on the day of their finals, they had significantly fewer natural killer cells.
They also found that loneliness, lots of life events and problems such as depression were all associated with a weak immune response.
Evaluation
It is a natural experiment since it took advantage of a naturally occurring event; examinations.
The independent variable (IV) was exam stress, a long-term form of stress. Most studies have concentrated on short-term stress. Note: natural experiments are high in ecological validity!
However though this was a natural experiment confounding variables are difficult to control. As a result we cannot be certain that stress led to the immune suppression. Other factors that were not controlled could be responsible.
Outline research into Chronic stress and the immune system
Kiecolt-Glaser et al
Method
42 couples who had been married for an average of 12 years had small suction devices placed on their arms to deliberately create eight small blisters. The tops of these were removed and a small bubble placed over the top allowing fluids to be withdrawn.
On their first such visit the couples were drawn into a positive discussion about behaviours they’d like to change.
Two months later the couples returned and the procedure repeated. This time however, they were drawn into a more negative discussion about areas of disagreement which often provoked very strong feelings.
Findings
When tested it was found that on the second visit the blisters took a whole day longer to heal (60% longer) and that levels of the hormone interleukin-6 that controls wound healing was much higher. Women seemed to be particularly prone to the effects.
Conclusion
The researchers believe that stress can significantly slow down the immune response and particularly lengthen the time for healing.
Evaluation
Individual differences; a relatively small sample of women so we cannot be sure that they are representative of the general population as so their results cannot be generalised. Also we do not know whether any personality factors made some of these women more/less susceptible to the negative effects of stress than others.
Outline and evaluate research into life changes
Aim
Holmes and Rahe (1967) were interested in the idea that life changes are linked to stress and illness. They suggested that change is stressful and therefore this affects our health. They developed the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS), as a way to measure the relationship between life changes and physical illness.
Method
Rahe et al. (1970) used the SRRS to test the hypothesis that the number of life events a person experienced would be positively correlated with illness. 2700 participants (males who worked for the US Navy) completed the SRRS. The questionnaire was completed before a tour of duty and they had to note all the life events they had experienced over the previous six months.
Results
The SRRS and the illness score were analysed and it was discovered that there was a significant positive correlation between LCU score and illness score of +.118.
Interestingly it was found that it does not matter whether an event is positive or negative; it is the amount of change an individual has to deal during a life event that creates stress. This supports the idea that there is a positive correlation between life changes and physical illness. This occurs because life changes causes stress and stress causes illness.
Evaluation
A strength of this research is the sample size, as 2700 individuals completed the SRRS it means the results are more likely to be representative and valid due to the large sample size. This means that the findings and conclusions can be applied to other individuals.
However, a weakness of this study is it lacks population validity, for example it was only carried on males meaning it is androcentric. As the data has only be obtained from males it means the results might not be replicated on a female population, thus the results could be unreliable and invalid. This weakens the explanation on life events causing stress as the findings can’t be generalised to the whole population.
Another weakness of this study is it relies on self-report data; this method of data collection is unreliable.
Research into Daily Hassles
Bouteyre et al
Aim
To investigate the relationship between daily hassles and mental health of students during their transition between school and University.
Procedure
First year psychology students completed the hassles and uplifts scale and the Beck depression inventory to measure depression.
Results
They found a positive correlation between students suffering from depression and scores on the daily hassles.
Conclusion
Transition from school to university has frequent daily hassles, which are a risk factor for developing depression.
General evaluation on daily hassles
Daily hassles accumulate over the course of the day and therefore provide a more significant source of stress than life changes.
Severe life changes may make participants more vulnerable to the stress of daily hassles.
What is workplace stress?
Workplace stressors are aspects of the workplace environment which elicits a stress response therefore which we experience as stressful.
What are the two sources of workplace stress?
- Workload: Having more to do than you can manage, or so little you get bored.
- Control: Having no control over your work rate or content; not being able to set your own priority.
Research into Workplace stress
Marmot et al
Aim
To investigate the effects of high workload an low job control on workplace stress.
Procedure
A sample of 10,308 civil servants aged 35-55 were investigated in a longitudinal study over the span of 3 years. Research methods included questionnaire and observation. Job control was measured through both a self-report survey and by independent assessments of the work environment by personal managers, using job specifications and role responsibilities. Job control was assessed on 2 occasions, 3 years apart. Records were kept of stress relate illness and the participants were checked for signs of cardiovascular disease. A correlational analysis was carried out to test the association between job control and stress related illness.
Results
Marmot et Al’s study found no link between high workload and stress related illness. 5 years after the assessment, marmot found men and women who initially reported low level of job control were 4 times more likely to develop heart disease than those with high levels of job control.
Conclusion
The findings seem to show that low job control is associated with high stress, as indicated by the number of stress-related illnesses. There is an inverse social gradient in stress related illness among British civil servants, as job control decreases so illness increases. In other words, the variables are negatively correlated. Implications include the responsibility of employers to address job control as a source of stress and illness.Giving employees more freedom and control may decrease stress-related illness, which in turn would increase the efficiency and productivity of the workforce.
Evaluation
+Kirimaki et al carried out a meta analysis of 14 studies and found that employees with high levels of job strain were +50% more likely to develop CHD
+Work is generally good for our health but it can be harmful, especially when combined with difficulties at home or daily hassles.
-Johansson et al looked at the effects of repetitive jobs that required much attention and found workers had higher illness rates and levels of adrenaline.
- Lazarus claims that the study of stressful factors in the workplace misses the point of people reacting and coping differently to individual stressors.
How does personality and stress link
This is the idea that our personality acts as an important moderator variable for stress. This helps to explain why the same life events or daily hassles are a source of stress for some individuals but not for others.
The effects of Type A and B on stress
In the 1960’s Friedman and roseman studied the behaviour of the patients suffering from coronary heart disease, they found that they displayed some distinctive behavioural pattern.
Features of Type A & B personalities
Type A: -Competitive -Time Urgent -Impatient -Hostile and Aggressive Type B: -Relaxed -One thing at a time attitude -Patient -Express Feeling
What is the link between Type A and CHD?
It is thought that type A are more susceptible to heart disease because it has been found that they have higher blood pressure and more stress hormones in their blood system- Roseman reported that Type A’s were more than twice as likely to develop heart disease than Type B personality types.
Research into Type A’s effect on CHD
Friedman and Rosenman
Aim
To investigate the links between Type A behaviour patterns and cardiovascular disease.
Procedure
Using structured interviews, 3200 men aged 39-59 were categorised as Type A, Type B and Type X(balance between both). Assessment based on answers to interview and behaviour during interview. The men were healthy at the start of the research. The sample was followed up for 8.5 years to assess lifestyle and health outcomes.
Findings
At the end of the study 257 men has developed CHD, 70% of those were from the Type A group. These results were significant even when risk factors such as smoking and obesity were taken into account.
Conclusion
Type A behaviour pattern is risk factor for heart disease. Behaviour modification programmes to reduce Type A behaviour should result in a reduce risk of heart disease.
Evaluation
-Myrtek meta analysis of 35 studies found an association between hostility and coronary heart disease ( hostility is a trait associated with type A personality )
-However Ragland and Brand found little evidence of a relationship between personality and CHD
-Is personality the cause or effect of stress
-Most studies focus on men
What is locus of control?
This is the extent to which an individual believes they are in control of their destiny(Internal) or at the mercy of events(External)