Streaming And Pupil Attainment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is streaming?

A

Setting and streaming in education is where students are put into groups based on ability. The most academic students are placed in the top sets or streams the the least academic are placed in the bottom sets.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does grouping and teaching by ability allow?

A

Allows for the more academic students to be taught faster and pushed harder, and for the less able students to be taught at a pace suitable for them and given the extra support they need.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What have studies proved about grouping and teaching by ability?

A

That it being able to benefit students at lower levels by teaching them at a suitable pace and giving them the extra support they need isn’t always the case, and students at lower levels do not get the support needed and it negatively affects them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who conducted a study of streaming in Beachside Comprehensive school and when?

A

Stephen Ball (1981)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

For how long did Ball carry out his study of streaming?

A

Over a period of three years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happened to students when they first arrived as Beachside Comprehensive school?

A

They were placed into one of three ability bands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Ball find about what determined the ability bands students at Beachside Comprehensive were initially placed into?

A

While the bands were supposedly based on ability, Ball found that other criteria such as social class background determined what bands pupils were placed in. Pupils of similar abilities were more likely to be placed in the top band if they were from middle-class backgrounds and those from working class backgrounds were placed in lower bands.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Ball find about the development of different attitudes of pupils in Beachside Comprehensive?

A

It was found that when pupils first entered the school they were all eager to learn and co-operative but over time differences in attitudes to learning and behaviour emerged dependent on which bands the students had been put into by teachers.

  • Pupils in lower bands were the most likely to develop anti-school attitudes which manifested as putting less effort into homework, taking part in disruptive behaviour in class, and higher rates of absenteeism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Ball find about teacher’s attitudes to teaching the different ability bands?

A

Teachers also had different approaches to teaching the different bands, as pupils in the top bands were ‘warmed up’; they were pushed harder, and directed towards doing the more academic subjects and more difficult exams while pupils in lower bands were ‘cooled down’; they were directed to doing the easier exams and more practical subjects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the conclusion of Ball’s study?

A

The conclusion of the study was that teachers label students based on their class background, and lower class students are more likely to be placed in lower sets and achieve lower grades in school, with the opposite being the case for middle-class students. Hence teacher labelling helps to reproduce social class inequalities in educational achievement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Nell Keddie look at in her study?

A

Looked at the operation of streaming in a single subject in a large London comprehensive school

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

As well as looking at the classification and evaluation of students, what did Keddie also study?

A

The ways in which knowledge was evaluated and classified. She tried to work out the criteria used by teachers to categorise and evaluate classroom knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Keddie discover about the ways in which classroom knowledge was evaluated and categorised by teachers?

A
  • She discovered that knowledge defined by teachers as appropriate to the particular course was considered worthwhile; and knowledge from the students’ experience which did not fit this definition was considered of little consequence.
  • Knowledge presented in an abstract and general form was considered superior to particular pieces of concrete information.
  • The knowledge made available to students depended on the teacher’s assessment of their ability to handle it, thus those students who were defined as bright were given greater access to highly valued knowledge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Keddie conclude from her study?

A

She concluded that classification and evaluations of both pupils and knowledge are socially constructed in interaction situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What conclusion did both Ball and Keddie come to?

A

That from an interactionist point of view, pupils experience school in different ways.
- They are treated differently by their teachers, given different labels, and often placed in different bands or streams. The pupils attach different meanings to their education and find a variety of ways to relate to their experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was found about pupil response to standards set by schools?

A

Schools usually lay down a set of standards and indicate to their pupils how they are expected to behave. However, not all students are able and willing to conform to the image of the ideal student held by teachers. If they fail to do so, pupils may well form their own subcultures which reject some of the values of the school.

17
Q

Who carried out early research into labelling in secondary modern schools and when?

A

David Hargreaves (1967)

18
Q

What connection did Hargreaves make in an early study of a secondary modern school?

A

Related the emergence of subcultures to labelling and streaming

19
Q

What did Hargreaves find about pupils who had negative labels attached to them by teachers?

A

Pupils labelled as ‘trouble-makers’ were placed in lower streams; and those whose behaviour was more acceptable were placed in higher streams.
- Pupils with negative labels attached to them had been defined as failures: first, by being placed in a secondary modern which was seen as a second-rate institution; and second, through the streaming system. Many teachers regarded them as no more than ‘worthless louts’.

20
Q

What did Hargreaves find about the response of pupils who were attached negative labels and placed in lower sets?

A

Faced with the problem of being unable to achieve high status within the school, such pupils attempted to protect their sense of worth and retain a positive self-concept.

21
Q

How did negatively labelled pupils attempt to protect their sense of worth and retain a positive self-concept?

A

Students labelled as troublemakers tended to seek out each other’s company, and within their group awarded high status to those who broke the school rules.
- Thus they disrupted lessons, gave cheek to teachers, failed to hand in homework, cheated and played truant. This all brought prestige amongst some of their peers.

22
Q

According to Hargreaves, what two distinctive subcultures emerged within the secondary modern school?

A

The conformists and the non-conformist delinquents

23
Q

Who conducted a study of two secondary schools in London and when?

A

Gilborn and Youdell (2001)

24
Q

What did Gilborn and Youdell find in their study?

A

Teachers were less likely to place working class and Black students into the top GCSE tiers even when they had been achieving similar grades in previous years to middle class and non-Black students.

  • Thus teachers were stereotyping these students and denying them the opportunity to achieve the highest GCSE grades.
25
Q

What is one of the key other factors that can affect pupils’ attainment?

A

Material deprivation

26
Q

What is material deprivation, and how can it affect attainment?

A

Material deprivation is the inability to afford basic resources. This will mean pupils are unable to afford things like sufficient food, heating or clothing and educational resources, which is subsequently very likely to affect educational performance and lead to underachievement

27
Q

What does research show about diet and attainment?

A

Research shows that poor diet and under-nourishment can lead to poor educational performance and clearly poor health and subsequently poor attendance at school which has a direct impact on achievement

28
Q

What material factors are important to education, and how can class background impact them?

A

Access to the internet, books, and a quiet place to work are all important material factors that are less accessible to working class pupils than middle class pupils.

29
Q

How can part-time employment affect educational attainment?

A
  • While a small amount of part-time employment can be beneficial educationally, working too many hours can seriously impact educational performance, both because there is insufficient time to study, and also because pupils are too tired to concentrate at school.
30
Q

Why are working-class students more likely to undertake employment alongside their studies?

A

It is more likely that working-class pupils will need to undertake employment alongside their studies in order to bring in more income into the household.

31
Q

How can pupils from households with higher incomes benefit in education from material factors?

A

Pupils from households with higher incomes can afford educational visits and also pay for private tuition, resulting in better grades.

32
Q

What did Pierre Bourdieu argue about capital?

A

Capital is usually used to refer to money; according to Marxists, having capital gives the wealthy power. Pierre Bourdieu argued that it is not only money that gives the wealthy power, but cultural assets too.

33
Q

What did Bourdieu argue about cultural capital and labelling?

A

He argued that the children of middle-class or wealthier parents are likely to have prior and external knowledge, behaviours, attitudes and cultural experiences that ensure that they succeed in education.

  • This is because sometimes schools assess cultural capital rather than what has been learnt in school and also teachers will perceive cultural capital as intelligence, and this in turn leads to them applying a positive label to the pupils.
34
Q

Summarise the assesment of the impact streaming can have on pupil attainment.

A

In conclusion, streaming can have a negative impact on mainly working-class pupils which encourages anti-school subcultures and less interest from teachers leading to low grades. This can also be impacted by teacher labelling.

Streaming can work to the benefit of pupils from middle-class or wealthier backgrounds, with teachers being more likely to place them into higher sets and view them as more intelligent or capable as a result of their cultural capital.

However, streaming is not the only thing which affects pupil attainment.