strama Flashcards
is a set of managerial decisions and actions that help determine
the long-term performance of an organization. It includes environmental scanning (both
external and internal),
Strategic management
Phase 1—Basic financial planning
Phase 2—Forecast-based planning
Phase 3—Externally oriented (strategic) planning
Phase 4—Strategic management
PHASES OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
Managers initiate serious planning when they
are requested to propose the following year’s budget. Projects are proposed on the basis
of very little analysis, with most information coming from within the firm. The sales
force usually provides the small amount of environmental information used in this
effort. Such simplistic operational planning only pretends to be strategic management,
yet it is quite time consuming. Normal company activities are often suspended for
weeks while managers try to cram ideas into the proposed budget. The time horizon is
usually one year.
Phase 1—Basic financial planning
As annual budgets become less useful at
stimulating long-term planning, managers attempt to propose five-year plans. At this
point, they consider projects that may take more than one year. In addition to internal
information, managers gather any available environmental data—usually on an ad hoc
basis—and extrapolate current trends. This phase is also time consuming, often
involving a full month or more of managerial activity to make sure all the proposed
budgets fit together. The process gets very political as managers compete for larger
shares of limited funds. Seemingly endless meetings take place to evaluate proposals
and justify assumptions. The time horizon is usually three to five years.
Phase 2—Forecast-based planning
Frustrated with highly political yet
ineffectual five-year plans, top management takes control of the planning process by initiating a formal
strategic planning system. The company seeks to increase its responsiveness to changing markets and
competition by thinking and acting strategically. Planning is taken out of the hands of lower-level
managers and concentrated in a planning staff whose task is to develop strategic plans for the
corporation. Consultants often provide the sophisticated and innovative techniques that the planning
staff uses to gather information and forecast future trends.
Phase 3—Externally oriented (strategic) planning
Realizing that even the best strategic plans are worthless without
the input and commitment of lower-level managers, top management forms planning groups of
managers and key employees at many levels, from various departments and workgroups. They develop
and integrate a series of plans focused on emphasizing the company’s true competitive advantages.
Strategic plans at this point detail the implementation, evaluation, and control issues. Rather than
attempting to perfectly forecast the future, the plans emphasize probable scenarios and contingency
strategies. The sophisticated annual five-year strategic plan is replaced with strategic thinking at all
levels of the organization throughout the year. Strategic information, previously available only
centrally to top management, is used by people throughout the organization. Instead of a large
centralized planning staff, internal and external planning consultants are available to help guide
group strategy discussions. Although top management may still initiate the strategic planning process,
the resulting strategies may come from anywhere in the organization. Planning is typically interactive
across levels and is no longer strictly top down. People at all levels are now involved.
Phase 4—Strategic management
■■ A clearer sense of strategic vision for the firm
■■ A sharper focus on what is strategically important.
■■ An improved understanding of a rapidly changing environment.
BENEFITS OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
as the term is used in business, is meant to describe new products, services,
methods, and organizational approaches that allow the business to achieve
extraordinary returns.
Innovation
refers to the use of business practices to manage the triple bottom line as
was discussed earlier. That triple bottom line involves (1) the management of
traditional profit/loss; (2) the management of the company’s social responsibility; and
(3) the management of its environmental responsibility. The company has a relatively
obvious long-term responsibility to the shareholders of the organization. That means
that the company has to be able to thrive despite changes in the industry, society, and
the physical environment. This is the focus of much of this textbook and the focus of
strategy in business. The company that pursues a sustainable approach to business has
a responsibility to its employees, its customers, and the community in which it operates.
Impact of Sustainability
■■ Environmental scanning
■■ Strategy formulation
■■ Strategy implementation
■■ Evaluation and control.
Basic Model of Strategic Management
is the monitoring, evaluating, and disseminating of
information from the external and internal environments to key people within the
corporation. Its purpose is to identify strategic factors—those external and internal
elements that will assist in the analysis of the strategic decisions of the corporation.
The simplest way to represent the outcomes of environmental scanning is through a
SWOT approach. SWOT is an acronym used to describe the particular Strengths,
Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats that appear to be strategic factors for a
specific company. The external environment consists of variables (opportunities and
threats) that are outside the organization and not typically within the short-run control
of top management. These variables form the context within which the corporation
exists.
Environmental scanning
is the process of investigation, analysis, and decision making that
provides the company with the criteria for attaining a competitive advantage. It
includes defining the competitive advantages of the business, identifying weaknesses
that are impacting the company’s ability to grow, crafting the corporate mission,
specifying achievable objectives, and setting policy guidelines.
Strategy formulation
An organization’s mission is the purpose or reason for the organization’s existence. It
announces what the company is providing to society—either a service such as
consulting, a set of products such as automobile tires, or a combination of the two such
as tablets and their associated Apps. A well-conceived mission statement defines the
fundamental, unique purpose that sets a company apart from other firms of its type.
Research reveals that firms with mission statements containing explicit descriptions of
their competitive advantages have significantly higher growth than firms without such
statements.
Mission: Stating Purpose
■■ Profitability (net profits)
■■ Efficiency (low costs, etc.)
■■ Growth (increase in total assets, sales, etc.)
■■ Shareholder wealth (dividends plus stock price appreciation)
■■ Utilization of resources (Return on Equity (ROE) or Return on Investment (ROI)
Objectives: Listing Expected Results
■■ Reputation (being considered a “top” firm)
■■ Contributions to employees (employment security, wages, diversity)
■■ Contributions to society (taxes paid, participation in charities, providing a needed
product or service)
■■ Market leadership (market share)
■■ Technological leadership (innovations, creativity)
■■ Survival (avoiding bankruptcy)
■■ Personal needs of top management (using the firm for personal purposes, such as
providing jobs for relatives)
Objectives: Listing Expected Results
An organization must examine the external environment in order to determine who
constitutes the perfect customer for the business as it exists today, who the most direct
competitors are for that customer, what the company does that is necessary to compete,
and what the company does that truly sets it apart from its competitors. These
elements can be rephrased into the strengths of the business, the understanding of its
weaknesses relative to its competitors, what opportunities would be most prudent,
Competitive Advantages
describes a company’s overall direction in terms of growth and
the management of its various businesses. generally fit within the
three main categories of stability, growth, and retrenchment.
Corporate strategy
usually occurs at the business unit or product level, and it
emphasizes improvement of the competitive position of a corporation’s products or
services in the specific industry or market segment served by that business unit.
It may fit within the two overall categories
Business strategy
is the approach taken by a functional area to achieve corporate
and business unit objectives and strategies by maximizing resource productivity. It is
concerned with developing and nurturing a distinctive competence to provide a
company or business unit with a competitive advantage.
Functional strategy
A policy is a broad guideline for decision making that links the formulation of a strategy
with its implementation. Companies use policies to make sure that employees
throughout the firm make decisions and take actions that support the corporation’s
mission, objectives, and strategies.
For example, when Cisco decided on a strategy of growth through acquisitions, it
established a policy to consider only companies with no more than 75 employees, 75% of
whom were engineers.47 Consider the following company policies:
Policies: Setting Guidelines
is a process by which strategies and policies are put into
action through the development of programs, budgets, and procedures. This process
might involve changes within the overall culture, structure, and/or management system
of the entire organization. Except when such drastic corporate wide changes are needed,
however, is typically conducted by middle- and lower-
level managers, with review by top management. Sometimes referred to as operational planning, often involves day-to-day decisions in resource
allocation.
Strategy implementation
is a statement of the activities or steps needed to support a
strategy. The terms are interchangeable. In practice, a program is a collection of tactics
where a tactic is the individual action taken by the organization as an element of the
effort to accomplish a plan. makes a strategy action-oriented. It
may involve restructuring the corporation, changing the company’s internal culture, or
beginning a new research effort.
A program or a tactic
is a statement of a corporation’s programs in terms of dollars. Used in
planning and control, a budget lists the detailed cost of each program. Many
corporations demand a certain percentage return on investment, often called a “hurdle
rate,” before management will approve a new program. This is done so that the new
program has the potential to significantly add to the corporation’s profit performance
and thus build shareholder value. The budget not only serves as a detailed plan of the
new strategy in action, it also specifies through proforma financial statements the
expected impact on the firm’s financial future.
Budgets: Costing Programs
are a system of
sequential steps or techniques that describe in detail how a particular task or job is to
be done. They typically detail the various activities that must be carried out in order to
complete the corporation’s program.
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)
is a process in which corporate activities and performance results are monitored so that
actual performance can be compared with desired performance. Managers at all levels
use the resulting information to take corrective action and resolve problems. Although
evaluation and control is the final major element of strategic management, it can also
pinpoint weaknesses in previously implemented strategic plans and thus stimulates the
entire process to begin again.
Evaluation and control
is the end result of activities. It includes the actual outcomes of the strategic management process. The practice of strategic management is justified in terms of its
ability to improve an organization’s performance, typically measured in terms of profits
and return on investment. For evaluation and control to be effective, managers must
obtain clear, prompt, and unbiased information from the people below them in the
corporation’s hierarchy. Using this information, managers compare what is actually
happening with what was originally planned in the formulation stage.
Performance
is something that acts as a stimulus for a change in strategy.
A triggering event
As organizations grow larger and more complex, with more uncertain
environments, decisions become increasingly complicated and difficult to make. In
agreement with the strategic choice perspective mentioned earlier, this book proposes a
strategic decision-making framework that can help people make these decisions
regardless of their level and function in the corporation.
Strategic Decision Making
Entrepreneurial mode: Strategy
Adaptive mode:
Planning mode:
Logical incrementalism:
MINTZBERG’S MODES OF STRATEGIC DECISION
MAKING
Strategy is made by one powerful individual. The focus is on
opportunities; problems are secondary. Strategy is guided by the founder’s own vision of
direction and is exemplified by large, bold decisions. The dominant goal is growth of the
corporation. Amazon.com, founded by Jeff Bezos, is an example of this mode of strategic
decision making. The company reflects Bezos’ vision of using the Internet to market
everything that can be bought.
Entrepreneurial mode
Sometimes referred to as “muddling through,” this decision-making
mode is characterized by reactive solutions to existing problems, rather than a
proactive search for new opportunities. Much bargaining goes on concerning the
priority of objectives. Strategy is fragmented and is developed to move a corporation
forward incrementally.
Adaptive mode
This decision-making mode involves the systematic gathering of
appropriate information for situation analysis, the generation of feasible alternative
strategies, and the rational selection of the most appropriate strategy. It includes both
the proactive search for new opportunities and the reactive solution of existing
problems.
Planning mode
A fourth decision-making mode can be viewed as a
synthesis of the planning, adaptive, and, to a lesser extent, the entrepreneurial modes.
In this mode, top management has a reasonably clear idea of the corporation’s mission
and objectives, but, in its development of strategies, it chooses to use “an interactive
process in which the organization probes the future, experiments, and learns from a
series of partial (incremental) commitments rather than through global formulations of
total strategies.
Logical incrementalism
■■ Evaluate current performance results in terms of (a) return on investment,
profitability, and so forth, and (b) the current mission, objectives, strategies, and
policies.
■■ Review corporate governance—that is, the performance of the firm’s board of
directors and top management.
■■ Scan and assess the external environment to determine the strategic factors that
pose opportunities and threats.
■■ Scan and assess the internal corporate environment to determine the strategic
factors that are strengths (especially core competencies) and weaknesses. ■■ Analyze
strategic factors to (a) pinpoint problem areas and (b) review and revise the corporate
mission and objectives, as necessary.
STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: AID TO
BETTER DECISIONS
■■ Generate, evaluate, and select the best alternative strategies in light of the analysis
conducted in the previous step.
■■ Implement selected strategies via programs, budgets, and procedures.
■■ Evaluate implemented strategies via feedback systems, and the control of activities
to ensure their minimum deviation from plans.
STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: AID TO
BETTER DECISIONS
is a mechanism established to allow different parties to contribute capital,
expertise, and labor for their mutual benefit. The investor/shareholder participates in the
profits (in the form of dividends and stock price increases) of the enterprise without taking
responsibility for the operations. Management runs the company without being responsible
for personally providing the funds. To make this possible, laws have been passed that give
shareholders limited liability and, correspondingly, limited involvement in a corporation’s
activities. That involvement does include, however, the right to elect directors who have a
legal duty to represent the shareholders and protect their interests. As representatives of
the shareholders, directors have both the authority and the responsibility to establish basic
corporate policies and to ensure that they are followed. The board of directors, therefore, has
an obligation to approve all decisions that might affect the long-term performance of the
corporation. This means that the corporation is fundamentally governed by the board of
directors overseeing top management, with the concurrence of the shareholder. The term
corporate governance refers to the relationship among these three groups in determining the
direction and performance of the corporation. Increasingly, shareholders, activist investors,
and various interest groups have seriously questioned the role of the board of directors in
corporations. They are concerned that inside board members may use their position to
feather their own nests and that outside board members often lack sufficient knowledge,
involvement, and enthusiasm to do an adequate job of monitoring and providing guidance to
top management.
A corporation
- Effective board leadership including the processes, makeup, and output of the board
- Strategy of the organization
- Risk vs. initiative and the overall risk profile of the organization
- Succession planning for the board and top management team
- Sustainability
Responsibilities of the Board
Monitor
Evaluate and influence
Initiate and determine
Role of the Board in Strategic Management
By acting through its committees, a board can keep abreast of
developments inside and outside the corporation, bringing to management’s attention
developments it might have overlooked. A board should, at the minimum, carry out this
task.
Monitor
A board can examine management’s proposals, decisions,
and actions; agree or disagree with them; give advice and offer suggestions; and outline
alternatives. More active boards perform this task in addition to monitoring.
Evaluate and influence
A board can delineate a corporation’s mission and specify
strategic options to its management. Only the most active boards take on this task in
addition to the two previous ones
Initiate and determine
The boards of most publicly owned corporations are composed of both inside and outside
directors. Inside directors (sometimes called management directors) are typically
officers or executives employed by the corporation. Outside directors (sometimes called
non-management directors) may be executives of other firms but are not employees of
the board’s corporation. Although there is yet no clear evidence indicating that a high
proportion of outsiders on a board results in improved financial performance.
Board of Directors Composition
is concerned with analyzing and resolving two problems that occur in relationships
between principals (owners/shareholders) and their agents (top management):
1. Conflict of interest arises when the desires or objectives of the owners and the
agents conflict. For example, attitudes toward risk may be quite different. Agents
may shy away from riskier strategies in order to protect their jobs.
2. Moral hazard refers to the situation where it is difficult or expensive for the owners
to verify what the agents are actually doing.
Agency theory
arises when the desires or objectives of the owners and the
agents conflict. For example, attitudes toward risk may be quite different. Agents
may shy away from riskier strategies in order to protect their jobs.
Conflict of interest
refers to the situation where it is difficult or expensive for the owners
to verify what the agents are actually doing.
Moral hazard
suggests that executives tend to be more motivated to
act in the best interests of the corporation than in their own self-interests. Whereas
agency theory focuses on extrinsic rewards that serve lower-level needs, such as pay
and security, stewardship theory focuses on the higher-order needs, such as
achievement and self-actualization.
stewardship theory
who, though not really employed by the corporation, handle the
legal or insurance work for the company or are important suppliers (and thus
dependent on the current management for a key part of their business)
Affiliated directors
who used to work for the company, such as the past
CEO who is partly responsible for much of the corporation’s current strategy and
who probably groomed the current CEO as his or her replacement. In the recent
past, many boards of large firms kept the firm’s recently retired CEO on the board
for a year or two after retirement as a courtesy, especially if he or she had
performed well as the CEO.
Retired executive directors
who are descendants of the founder and own significant blocks of
stock (with personal agendas based on a family relationship with the current CEO).
The Schlitz Brewing Company, for example, was unable to complete its turnaround
strategy with a non-family CEO because family members serving on the board
wanted their money out of the company, forcing it to be sold.
Family directors
Traditionally, the CEO of a corporation decided whom to invite to board membership
and merely asked the shareholders for approval in the annual proxy statement. All
nominees were usually elected. There are some dangers, however, in allowing the CEO
free rein in nominating directors. The CEO might select only board members who, in
the CEO’s opinion, will not disturb the company’s policies and functioning.
Nomination and Election of Board Members
- Boards are getting more involved not only in reviewing and evaluating company
strategy but also in shaping it. - Women and minorities are being increasingly represented on boards.
- Boards are establishing mandatory retirement ages for board members—typically
around age 70. - As corporations become more global, they are increasingly looking for board
members with international experience. - Society, in the form of special interest groups, increasingly expects boards of
directors to balance the economic goal of profitability with the social needs of
society. Issues dealing with workforce diversity and environmental sustainability
are now reaching the board level.
Trends in Corporate Governance
especially those of the CEO, involve getting things
accomplished through and with others in order to meet the corporate objectives. Top
management’s job is thus multidimensional and is oriented toward the welfare of the
total organization.
Specific top management tasks vary from firm to firm and are developed from an
analysis of the mission, objectives, strategies, and key activities of the corporation.
Tasks are typically divided among the members of the top management team. A
diversity of skills can thus be very important.
Research indicates that top management teams with a diversity of functional
backgrounds, experiences, and length of time with the company tend to be significantly
related to improvements in corporate market share and profitability. In addition, highly
diverse teams with some international experience tend to emphasize international
growth strategies and strategic innovation, especially in uncertain environments, as a
means to boost financial performance. The CEO, with the support of the rest of the top
management team, has two primary responsibilities when it comes to strategic
management. The first is to provide executive leadership and a vision for the firm. The
second is to manage a strategic planning process.
Responsibilities of Top Management
is the directing of activities toward the accomplishment of
corporate objectives. ___ is important because it sets the tone for the
entire corporation. A strategic vision is a description of what the company is capable of
becoming. It is often communicated in the company’s vision statement. People in an
organization want to have a sense of direction, but only top management is in the
position to specify and communicate their unique strategic vision to the general
workforce. Top management’s enthusiasm (or lack of it) about the corporation tends to
be contagious.
Executive leadership
The CEO envisions the company not as it currently is but as it can become. The new
perspective that the CEO’s vision brings gives renewed meaning to everyone’s work and
enables employees to see beyond the details of their own jobs to the functioning of the
total corporation. Louis Gerstner proposed a new vision for IBM when he proposed that
the company change its business model from computer hardware to services. In a
survey of 1,500 senior executives from 20 different countries, when asked the most
important behavioral trait a CEO must have, 98% responded that the CEO must convey
“a strong sense of vision.”
The CEO articulates a strategic vision for the
corporation
The leader empathizes with followers and sets an example in terms of behavior, dress,
and actions. The CEO’s attitudes and values concerning the corporation’s purpose and
activities are clear-cut and constantly communicated in words and deeds.
The CEO presents a role for others to identify with
and to follow
The leader empowers followers by raising their beliefs in their own capabilities. No
leader ever improved performance by setting easily attainable goals that provided no
challenge. Communicating high expectations to others can often lead to high
performance. The CEO must be willing to follow through by coaching people. As a
result, employees view their work as very important and thus motivating. Ivan
Seidenberg, chief executive of Verizon Communications, was closely involved in
deciding Verizon’s strategic direction, and he showed his faith in his people by letting
his key managers handle important projects and represent the company in public
forums. Grateful for his faith in them, his managers were fiercely loyal both to him and
the company.
The CEO communicates high-performance standards
Economic responsibilities
Legal responsibilities
Ethical responsibilities
Discretionary responsibilities
Carroll’s Four Responsibilities of Business
responsibilities of a business organization’s management are to produce goods and services
of value to society so that the firm may repay its creditors and increase the wealth of its shareholders.
Economic responsibilities
responsibilities are defined by governments in laws that management is expected to obey. For
example, U.S. business firms are required to hire and promote people based on their credentials rather
than to discriminate on non-job-related characteristics such as race, gender, or religion.
Legal responsibilities
responsibilities of an organization’s management are to follow the generally held beliefs about
behavior in a society. For example, society generally expects firms to work with the employees and the
community in planning for layoffs, even though no law may require this. The affected people can get
very upset if an organization’s management fails to act according to generally prevailing ethical values.
Ethical responsibilities
responsibilities are the purely voluntary obligations a corporation assumes. Examples are
philanthropic contributions, training the hard-core unemployed, and providing day-care centers. The
difference between ethical and discretionary responsibilities is that few people expect an organization to
fulfill discretionary responsibilities, whereas many expect an organization to fulfill ethical ones
Discretionary responsibilities
is the identification and evaluation of corporate stakeholders. This can be done in a
three-step process.
Stakeholder analysis
Once stakeholder impacts have been identified, managers should decide whether stakeholder input
should be invited into the discussion of the strategic alternatives. A group is more likely to accept or
even help implement a decision if it has some input into which alternative is chosen and how it is to
be implemented.
Stockholder Input
refers to the process of evaluating and choosing among alternatives in a manner consistent with ethical
principles. In making ________it is necessary to perceive and eliminate unethical options and select the best ethical
alternative.
Ethical decision-making
The desire to do the right thing regardless of the cost
Commitment
The awareness to act consistently and apply moral convictions to daily behavior
Consciousness
The ability to collect and evaluate information, develop alternatives, and foresee potential consequences and risks
Competency
Effective decisions are effective if they accomplish what we want accomplished and if they advance our purposes. A choice
that produces unintended and undesirable results is ineffective. The key to making effective decisions is to think about choices
in terms of their ability to accomplish our most important goals. This means we have to understand the difference between
immediate and short-term goals and longer-range goals.
Good decisions are both ethical and effective
generate and sustain trust; demonstrate respect, responsibility, fairness and caring; and are consistent with
good citizenship. These behaviors provide a foundation for making better decisions by setting the ground rules for our behavior.
Ethical decisions
are effective if they accomplish what we want accomplished and if they advance our purposes. A choice
that produces unintended and undesirable results is ineffective. The key to making effective decisions is to think about choices
in terms of their ability to accomplish our most important goals. This means we have to understand the difference between
immediate and short-term goals and longer-range goals.
Effective decisions
Some people justify their seemingly unethical positions by arguing that there is no one absolute code
of ethics and that morality is relative. Simply put, moral relativism claims that morality is relative to
some personal, social, or cultural standard and that there is no method for deciding whether one
decision is better than another. At one time or another, most managers have probably used one of the
four types of moral relativism—naïve, role, social group, or cultural—to justify questionable
behavior.
Moral Relativism
Based on the belief that all moral decisions are deeply personal and that
individuals have the right to run their own lives, adherents of moral relativism argue that each person
should be allowed to interpret situations and act according to his or her own moral values. This is not
so much a belief as it is an excuse for not having a belief or is a common excuse for not taking action
when observing others lying or cheating
Naïve relativism
Based on the belief that social roles carry with them certain obligations to that role,
adherents of role relativism argue that a manager in charge of a work unit must put aside his or her
personal beliefs and do instead what the role requires—that is, act in the best interests of the unit.
Blindly following orders was a common excuse provided by Nazi war criminals after World War II.
Role relativism
Another reason why some business people might be seen as unethical is that they may have no
well-developed personal sense of ethics. A person’s ethical behavior is affected by his or her level of
moral development, certain personality variables, and such situational factors as the job itself, the
supervisor, and the organizational culture.42 Kohlberg proposes that a person progresses through
three levels of moral development. 43 Similar in some ways to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, in
Kohlberg’s system, the individual moves from total self-centeredness to a concern for universal
values. Kohlberg’s three levels are as follows:
Kohlberg’s Levels of Moral Development