Stock Market Terms Flashcards
fungible–
meaning that it can be purchased or traded.
true margin of safety
is one that can be demonstrated by figures, by persuasive reasoning, and by reference to a body of actual experience.”
To evaluate co. Graham looked at
the value of existing assets, such as cash, inventory, and property, by examining a target company’s financial statements.
Graham also looked at
looked at current earnings.
Lastly, and only in rare circumstances, Graham considered
future profits, but only in the core competence area of a firm with a sustainable competitive advantage.
The concept of mean reversion is a major underpinning of the value- investing philosophy. It means
that past winners often become future losers, while past losers often become future winners.
behavioral finance.
the role of market psychology in investing.
Graham’s deep value strategy Net–Net.
pick investments was to find companies selling for less than their cash- liquidation value.
Graham would consider it a bargain under his Net–Net deep-value approach if when
compared this aggregate amount of cash and hard assets to the stock market value of the firm, the company was selling for less than market value
Graham’s distinction between the enterprising investor and the defensive investor.
The difference was based on the ability of the investor to put time and effort into the research process.
For the defensive investor, Graham suggested
7 factors in selecting a common stock.
Adequate Size.
Graham reasoned that larger firms are less likely to go out of business; that they probably have resources, scale, and experience to weather any storm.
Sufficiently Strong Financial Condition.
Graham defined this term as current assets at least twice the size of current liabilities. He also thought total liabilities should not be higher than working capital (that is, current assets minus current liabilities).
Earnings Stability. Graham defined earnings stability as
positive earnings for at least 10 consecutive years. This rule eliminates many cyclical firms and those younger than 10 years.
A Strong Dividend Record. This criterion recommends
20 years or more of uninterrupted dividends. This rule eliminates most growth stocks, since the vast majority don’t pay dividends.
Organic Earnings Growth
of at Least 33% over the Past 10 Years And eliminate businesses that are stagnant or shrinking, even if they pay dividends or generate a lot of cash.
Moderate Price-to-Earnings Ratio.
the current price of the stock as not more than 15 times its average earnings over the past 3 years. This number makes sense to many investors, since the long-term P/E ratio for U.S. stocks is about 15.
A Moderate Ratio of Price to Assets.
a moderate price-to-assets ratio as a firm trading for less than 1.5 times its book value.
Book value
is also known as accounting net worth. It’s equal to all of the firm’s assets minus all of its liabilities. This factor of less than 1.5 times book value also rules out most growth stocks since they often trade at a high multiple of Price to Book.
another simple Graham
Create a portfolio that consists of at least 30 stocks with P/E ratios less than 10 and debt-to-equity ratios less than 50%. Hold each stock until it returns 50%. If it doesn’t achieve a 50% return after 2 years, sell it no matter.
Buffett’s contribution to the concept of value investing
find high- quality companies selling at a discount and to let the moat around these companies protect his investment, enabling him to hold them for his favorite holding period—forever.
This time-value of money, called the “float,” is a boon to an investor
An insurer has the use of every insurance premium for a period of time—from a day to months to forever—before it has to pay a claim on someone’s behalf.
Buffett’s moat—a
a durable competitive advantage— a buffer around a company’s core business that makes attack difficult for the competition. Two popular approaches to analyzing a company’s moat are Porter’s 5 Forces and Morningstar’s Economic Moat Framework. bargaining power when dealing with jewelry merchants. Conversely, clothes can be manufactured fairly cheaply in many places around the world, so companies like Nike have a lot of power in their supplier relationships.
Porter’s 5 Forces.
a framework to help explain the impact of industry structure on performance, generally referred to as
The threat of new entrants.
Certain businesses require massive capital to get started. The harder it is for a new firm to enter a market, the greater the competitive advantage of the firms already in that market.
The threat of substitute products or services.
Although some products have no substitute, most industries offer a variety of substitutes. The fewer substitute products or services, the greater the competitive advantage.
The bargaining power of customers.
The Internet has given customers great power. Best Buy went from being a dominant company to one struggling to survive because customers could search for better prices on Amazon.com and other websites.
The bargaining power of suppliers.
The less a firm is impacted by its suppliers, the greater its competitive advantage. The De Beers cartel of South Africa controls about 35% of the diamonds produced in the world. De Beers has extraordinary bargaining power when dealing with jewelry merchants. Conversely, clothes can be manufactured fairly cheaply in many places around the world, so companies like Nike have a lot of power in their supplier relationships.
The intensity of competitive rivalry.
Firms in the airline industry, such as U.S. Airways, went bankrupt because of intense competition. Conversely, the less intense the rivalry, the greater the competitive advantage.
Morningstar identified
5 factors that are a framework for its research rating based to a large extent on a company’s moat.
The first factor is the network effect.
Morningstar believes a network effect occurs when the value of a company’s service increases, as more people use the service.
The second factor is intangible assets.
A patent is an intangible asset that provides legal protection lasting up to 20 years. A brand name is an invaluable asset that can be hard to quantify, but easy to see in action.
The third factor is cost advantage.
The concept of a cost advantage can easily apply to many industries. For example, stories abound of Wal-Mart and Home Depot driving their smaller competitors out of business because they couldn’t match the larger firms’ low prices. Having a cost advantage also gives these companies the opportunity to raise prices without worrying about losing the bulk of their customers.
The fourth factor is switching cost.
Imagine if you had a new alarm system installed in your house. It would be expensive to switch it for a new system, even if the new system had lower monthly fees. The same concept applies to other products.
The fifth factor is efficient scale.
Efficient scale relates to a niche market served by a small number of companies—in some cases, only one. For example, building a hospital is a massive undertaking, so there is likely to be only one in each town or county.
Buffett came to believe that a better approach to value investing
would be to buy high-quality companies with a moat around their businesses.
Fisher-Price (FP) on growth stock
is like a first-round draft pick: A lot is expected and it is in great demand, so it usually sells at a high price. One reason is that a stock can split.
The two most common tools to differentiate growth stocks from value stocks are
the price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) and the price-to-book ratio.
P/E ratio is
the price of a share divided by its annual earnings per share. If the P/E of the market is at 15, any stock with a P/E of less than 15 would be considered a value stock, while a stock with a P/E higher than 15 would be considered a growth stock.
price-to-book ratio
is the price per share of the stock divided by the book value—that is, the accounting value or net worth figure on the balance sheet—per share.
high price-to-book ratio
suggests a growth stock: It’s valued in part on its future potential.
Low price-to-book ratio indicates
a value stock: It might be undervalued relative to its intrinsic worth.
Another way to differentiate growth from value stocks is
the average valuation level of the market. Anything above the current market average is considered to be a growth stock, while anything below average is considered a value stock.
As a growth investor, Fisher looked for companies
with the potential to significantly grow sales for several years into the future. The quality of a firm’s sales force was one of the factors that Fisher assessed. A firm that grows sales at a faster rate than the industry is one sign of a good quality sales organization.
Fisher also
the integrity of a target company’s management.
Signs of quality management included the following factors:
Management talks freely to investors about its affairs when things are going well and when they’re not.
The firm is able to keep growing when a product has run its course.
The company’s research and development function, or R&D is robust
Growth stocks typically have
above-average profit margins.
Price is
best known for his life-cycle approach to investing. He felt that the risks of owning a stock increase when the industry it competes in matures. He wanted to buy stocks when earnings were increasing or accelerating.
The industry life cycle typically has 4 stages
- A period of rapid and increasing sales growth.
- A period of stable growth. Consolidation tends to occur during this phase.
- Slowing growth or maturity.
- Minimal or negative growth. The industry revenues and earnings are in relative decline.
Price’s preferred hunting ground
was the stable growth phase since
Price differentiated between two types of growth.
The first is cyclical, where the magnitude of the industry’s growth is tied strongly to the economy. For example, during the 1950s auto sales grew sharply.
The other type is stable growth. In this case, sales are not highly dependent on the specific phase of the economic cycle. For example, health care stocks can grow strongly during a recession.
When considering growth, Price also looked at a range of criteria:
- Superior research and development activities likely to spur future growth.
- Avoidance of cutthroat competition.
- Relative immunity from government regulation
- Low total labor costs but fair employee compensation.
Besides high growth in sales and earnings per share, Price also wanted
stocks with at least a 10% return on invested capital
Return on invested capital can be calculated a few ways, but one popular approach
divides net income by capital, basically the value on its balance sheet of its debt and equity.
Return on invested capital can be calculated a few ways, but one popular approach divides net income by capital, basically the value on its balance sheet of its debt and equity.
Many industries are defined by a sort of Darwinian process of elimination for achieving high profits. Price recognized this dynamic and suggested finding the most promising company or companies in a growth industry. He also provided some insight on how to determine when a firm was losing its edge
- Companies lose patents and new inventions may make old
- The legislative or legal environment can get worse for a firm, affecting its ability to grow
- The costs of labor and raw materials also affect a firm’s profitability significantly.
He fleshed out his ideas by carefully looking at
sales growth, earnings growth, profit margins, and return on invested capital.
Modern portfolio theory has its roots
in Markowitz’s work in the early 1950s. It’s still called modern portfolio theory
The Theory of Investment Value,
The price of a stock is equal to the value of its future dividends, adjusted for the time value of money. That is, a dividend of $1 today is worth more than a dividend of $1 in the future.
formula for the variance of a weighted sum essentially
is used to calculate the variance of a portfolio—a popular measure of risk.
Markowitz also learned about the production possibility frontier concept,
which posits that an economy makes tradeoffs in what it produces.
The standard deviation—
the square root of variance—is one widely used measure of volatility.
risk of a portfolio is primarily based
on the interaction of the portfolio’s holdings, not on the risk of the securities individually or in isolation.
correlation
The mathematical term for the way two assets move with or against each other
The art of picking a diversified portfolio
is to select securities that have low correlation and positive expected returns.
Markowitz’s efficient frontier
Markowitz called this curve the
the notion of the production possibility frontier and imagined a graphed curve that shows the range of portfolios that maximize return for a given level or tolerance of risk.
The optimal portfolio
for you is the place where your indifference curve matches the efficient set of portfolios.
Capital Asset Pricing Model or CAPM
model showing that the expected return on any risk asset is equal to the risk-free rate of interest plus the market risk of the asset (beta) times the market risk premium as a whole.
risk-free rate,
fixed-income security issued by the government, is virtually free of default. say a fixed-income security issued by the government, is virtually free of default
To this risk-free rate add
The beta
The average beta of the market as a whole is
one . Therefore, stocks with a beta lower than one are less risky than the market. Stocks with a beta greater than one are riskier than the market.
The market risk premium
the expected return on the market minus the risk-free rate. The market premium is tied to market psychology, so it can expand or contract. On average, it tends to be around 6% or 7%.
According to the theory, a portfolio of high beta stocks yields
high return. When the market goes up, such portfolios tend to outperform the market and low beta portfolios tend to underperform the market. But when stocks go down, portfolios of low beta stocks tend to lose less than high beta portfolios.
from 1966 to the present, the theory held up less well.
High beta stocks returned less than expected and low beta stocks returned more than expected. In some respects, the theory was turned upside-down: Many low-risk investments outperformed many high-risk investments.
Fama and French set out to better explain the relationship between risk and return. They found two factors that mattered greatly:
size and style
Size is the
market value or market capitalization of the firm. It equals the stock price times the number of shares outstanding. Over long periods, small cap stocks outperform large cap stocks. This finding makes intuitive sense, since small firms are nimbler and can grow quickly from a smaller.
Style refers
to growth or value. Value stocks historically return more than growth stocks over long periods because growth stocks tend to be glamorous, and investors often bid them up. Eventually, some run into competition or have missteps and fall back down to earth. Since not much is expected of value stocks, they often fix their problems and show a surprise upside.