Statutory Interpretation (see also legislation) Flashcards
What Section of the Human Rights Act of 1998 has had a big impact on Statutory Interpretation?
Section 3
What does section 3 of the Human Rights Act of 1998 say?
Interpretation of legislation.
(1) So far as it is possible to do so, primary legislation and subordinate legislation must be read and given effect in a way which is compatible with the Convention rights.
(2) This section—
(a) applies to primary legislation and subordinate legislation whenever enacted;
(b) does not affect the validity, continuing operation or enforcement of any incompatible primary legislation; and
(c) does not affect the validity, continuing operation or enforcement of any incompatible subordinate legislation if (disregarding any possibility of revocation) primary legislation prevents removal of the incompatibility.
What are the Three Traditional Rule of Statutory Interpretation?
1) The Literal Rule, 2) The Golden Rule 3) the Mischief Rule
Explain what the Literal Rule is and what a judge is to do when using the rule.
The Literal Rule is the more traditional approach to interpreting statues. When using the literal rule the judge is required to consider what the legislation actually says rather than what it might actually mean.
What is one of the major weaknesses of the literal rule?
The essential weakness of the literal rule is that it sometimes wrongly assumes that there is a single, literal understanding or words.
What is the Golden Rule?
The Golden Rule is a traditional rule of statutory interpretation. It is considered to be an extension of the literal rule. It is used when the result of using the literal rule leads to an obviously absurd result.
How can the courts NOT use the Golden Rule?
A court is not to use to Golden rule to ignore, replace and legislative provisions simply on the bases that it does not agree with them. In order to use the Golden Rule, a Court much find genuine difficulties before it declines to use the literal rule.
In the text Sources of Law, by Gary Slapper, two versions of the Golden Rule are mentioned. What are they and when are they used?
1) The Narrow Meaning - Used when there are two contradictory meanings to a prticular word used ina legislative providion, or if the provision is simply ambiguous in its effect. 2) The Wider Meaning - used when there is only one possible meaning to the words of a statutory provisions, but the courts feel to adopt the literal interpretation would lead to inconsistency, absurdity and inconvenience.
What is the Mischief Rule, when was it introduced?
The Mischief Rule is the most flexible traditional rule to statutory interpretation. It was introduced in Heydon’s Case 1584
What are the 4 questions the Judges should ask when using the Mischief Rule?
The four questions, which are laied out in Heydon’s Case are 1) what was the common law before the passing of the statute. 2) What was the mischief in the law which the common law did not adequately deal with. 3) What remedy for the mischief had parliament intended to provide? 4) What was the reason for parliament adopting that remedy?
Which of the three traditional rules should be used and when?
There is no hierarchy that prescribes how to use the rules. The Golden Rule should be used only if the Literal Rule results in an obscurity, however, the courts are free to use any or all of the rules when interpreting a statue.
What are secondary aids to interpretation?
Secondary Aids to interpretation can be used by the courts to assist them in interpreting statutes. they can be intrinsic or extrinsic or presumptions.
What are the Intrinsic Secondary Aids?
Intrinsic aids refer to the statue itself. They include the Long Title, Preamble, Schedules, Section Headings, Marginal Notes and Punctuation.
What are the Extrinsic Secondary Aids?
Extrinsic Secondary aids allow judges to look outside of the act itself. These include Dictionaries, textbooks, earlier statutes, travaux preparatoires and within limits, Hansard.
What is Hansard and when can it be used for statutory interpretation?
Hansard are records of the Parliamentary debates that take place before a Statute is enacted. They were historically not allowed to be used as aids to statutory interpretation. However, since the case of Pepper v Hart, Hansard can be referred to in limited situations. e.g. when applying the mischief rule, the courts can refer to hansard to determine the particular mischief the parliament was trying to right when enacting the legislation.