Statutory interpretation Flashcards
What is statutory interpretation?
When judges try of interpret the wording of the act when trying to apply the law.
Why do statutes need to be interpreted?
- Mistakes- by people who write them up.
(Fisher V Bell) - Words can change meaning over time.
(Cheeseman V DPP) - Circumstances can change so words no longer appropriate.
(Royal College of nursing V DHSS) - Act may use broad terms instead of a specific word.
( Brock V DPP)
What are the four main rules?
- Literal
- Golden
- Mischief
- Purposive
What is the literal rule?
Judges take the ordinary and natural meaning of the word, respects parliamentary sovereignty and creates consistency.
What happened in Fisher and Bell?
Restriction of offensive weapons act passed to stop sale/ use of flick knives, D had a flick knife for sale in window. A shop display is not an offer for sale but invitation to treat.
- He was acquitted but went against what the act wanted so absurd result.
What is the golden rule?
Extension of the literal rule when it gives an absurd result then judge can alter the words to produce desired outcome.
What are the two types of golden rule?
- Narrow rule- when word has several meanings pick the meaning which makes sense.
- Wide rule- judge understands the meaning but doesn’t use it as creates an absurd result.
What happened in Allen?
Offence to marry when already married. Marry had 2 meanings.
A) Legally married
B) Ceremony
- Used first meaning and found him guilty.
(Narrow rule)
What happened in Re Sigworth?
Property of dead person goes to next of kin, he killed his mother.
- Didn’t want property to go to him so he used the wide approach so this didn’t happen.
What should a judge consider when using mischief rule?
- What was common law before the act?
- What was the problem with that law?
- What remedy were parliament trying to provide?
What does the mischief rule allow?
- Rule was created in Heydon’s case and gives the judge the most flexibility when deciding what parliament wanted to stop.
- They can ignore the wording of the act to fin result they want.
What happened in Smith and Hughes?
Offence for prostitutes to loiter in streets or public places, the prostitutes were in windows.
- Guilty as the point of the act was to stop prostitutes harassing people which they still were.
(Mischief)
What is the purposive approach?
- Looks for the ‘purpose’ of an act.
- Don’t just look back at what the act wanted to put right, but look at what parliament wanted to achieve.
- When using this the judge will usually look outside of the act to find parliament’s true intentions.
(R V Registrar-General)
What are aids to interpretation?
Help the judge find out what the statute means, helps them further understand the law.
What are the three latin rules of language?
- Edjusdem generis
- Expressio unius exlusio alterius
- Noscitur a sociis