Statutory interpretation Flashcards

1
Q

What does the literal rule state?

A

The literal rule states that words in a statute must be given their plain, ordinary, and literal meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

when applying the literal rule, what should be done if the words of a statute are clear?

A

If the words are clear, they must be applied, even if the intention of the legislator may have been different or the result is harsh or undesirable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the role of judges?

A

Judges are not supposed to ‘make’ law but to interpret the law. They must follow the plain meaning of the statute’s words.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the concept of parliamentary sovereignty in relation to the literal rule?

A

Parliament is sovereign, and judges cannot declare an Act of Parliament unlawful. If Parliament dislikes the literal interpretation, it can amend the legislation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the Golden Rule in legal interpretation?

A

The Golden Rule is an adaptation of the Literal Rule, allowing words to be given their ordinary meaning unless it leads to an absurd or totally obnoxious result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the wider sense of the Golden Rule?

A

The wider sense of the Golden Rule allows for interpreting a statute in a way that avoids a result contrary to public policy or good governance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the narrow sense of the Golden Rule?

A

The narrow sense of the Golden Rule is used when there is ambiguity or absurdity in the wording of the statute. It allows the court to choose the most appropriate meaning, but only within reasonable limits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How is the narrow sense of the Golden Rule applied?

A

In the narrow sense, the court selects the more appropriate meaning of a word when it has more than one interpretation, avoiding an absurd or obnoxious result. It ensures the law is practical and possible to apply.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how should a statute be interpreted in the wider sense of golden rule?

A

The statute should be interpreted in a way that reflects its intended purpose, parliaments intended purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does the Mischief Rule require when interpreting a statute?

A

The Mischief Rule requires the interpreter to ascertain the legislator’s intention behind the statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the original meaning of the word “mischief” in the context of statutory interpretation?

A

“mischief” refers to “harm” or “wrong,” which is the defect in the existing law the statute was intended to remedy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does the Mischief Rule help in statutory interpretation?

A

The Mischief Rule helps the court to identify the “mischief” or problem in the existing law that the statute was designed to correct and interprets the statute accordingly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the Purposive Approach in statutory interpretation?

A

The Purposive Approach focuses on the purpose or intent behind a statute, interpreting it in a way that fulfills the law’s goals, even if it departs from the literal meaning of the words.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How has the UK’s membership in the EU influenced the Purposive Approach?

A

The Purposive Approach was influenced by the UK’s membership in the EU, especially through the European Communities Act (ECA) 1972, which required UK courts to interpret domestic law in line with EU law, often using a purposive method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does the Purposive Approach encourage judges to consider?

A

The Purposive Approach encourages judges to consider the wider economic or social impacts of a statute when interpreting the law, ensuring outcomes align with the law’s purpose and achieve a just result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the rule of Noscitur a Sociis?

A

It means that a word derives its meaning from the surrounding words. Judges use the context of neighboring words to clarify ambiguous terms.

14
Q

What is an example of Noscitur a Sociis?

A

‘Only the following animals are permitted in this block of flats – dogs, cats, hamsters
and gerbils.’ - would this include a tiger? NO - the clause contains an exhaustive list of animals,
which have the common theme of domesticiy.

15
Q

What is the rule of Eiusdem Generis?

A

It means “of the same kind.” When a general term follows a list of specific terms, the general term is interpreted to include only items of the same type as those listed.

16
Q

What is the rule of Expressio Unius?

A

It means “the expression of one thing excludes others.” When specific items are listed, anything not included in the list is assumed to be excluded.

17
Q

What is an example of Expressio Unius?

A

If a law permits “buses and taxis” to use a specific lane, it implies that other vehicles, like bicycles or private cars, are excluded. - items are intentionally not included.

18
Q

What are intrinsic aids in statutory interpretation?

A

Intrinsic aids are parts of the statute itself that judges can refer to in order to understand the meaning of a particular section.

19
Q

Why must the statute be read as a whole when using intrinsic aids?

A

The statute must be read as a whole to ensure that words are interpreted in their proper context.

20
Q

What parts of a statute can be used as intrinsic aids?

A

Judges can refer to the long and short titles, preamble (if present), punctuation, and headings in the statute.

21
Q

Are marginal notes considered reliable intrinsic aids? Why or why not?

A

No, marginal notes are not considered reliable because they are not debated in Parliament and are not part of the formal legislative process.

22
Q

What are extrinsic aids in statutory interpretation?

A

Extrinsic aids are resources outside the statute itself, such as Interpretation Acts, dictionaries, or other statutes, that judges use to clarify the meaning of unclear or ambiguous terms in legislation.

23
Q

What is the purpose of the Interpretation Acts in statutory interpretation (extrinsic aid)?

A

Interpretation Acts define commonly used words and phrases in legislation to ensure consistency.

24
Q

When do judges refer to dictionaries as an extrinsic aid?

A

Judges use dictionaries to determine the ordinary meaning of a word, especially when it does not have a specific legal definition or when applying the literal rule

25
Q

other statues as intrinsic aid, explain?

A

The court may look at other statutes, whether recent or long-standing. BUT, just because
a word has been interpreted in one Act does not mean it will be interpreted the same way in
another

26
Q

What is Hansard?

A

Hansard is the official verbatim record of debates and proceedings in Parliament, documenting discussions on Bills before they become Acts.

27
Q

Under what conditions can Hansard be used, according to Pepper v Hart

A

(a) the statute is ambiguous or obscure, or its literal meaning leads to an absurdity; and

(b) the material consists of clear statements by a minister or other promoter of the Bill.

28
Q

What are “other sources” in statutory interpretation?

A

Other sources include academic materials like established textbooks and commentaries by legal scholars. One example is Halsbury’s Laws of England

29
Q

What are presumptions in statutory interpretation?

A

Presumptions are long-standing legal principles applied by judges to interpret statutes, assuming certain rules apply unless strong evidence shows Parliament intended otherwise.

30
Q

Can presumptions in statutory interpretation be rebutted?

A

Yes, presumptions can be rebutted with strong evidence proving Parliament had a contrary intention.

31
Q

What does the presumption against alteration of common law state?

A

It presumes that statutes do not change common law unless the statute explicitly states an intention to do so.

32
Q

What is the presumption against retrospective operation of statutes?

A

Statutes are presumed to apply only to future actions, not past events, unless specifically stated otherwise.