Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

OCR A-level law PAPER " SECTION A > Statutory interpretation > Flashcards

Statutory interpretation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards Civil Procedure 1L flashcards
1
Q

Literal Rule

A
  • words plain ordinary grammatical meaning , as in dictionary
  • Whitely V Chappell
  • LNER V Berriman
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Whiteley V Chappell

A

D impersonate any person entitled to vote -> aquitted as impersonated dead person who couldnt vote ‘

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

LNER V Berriman

A
  • railway worker widow unable to claim compensation for as her husband killed oiling track which counted as maintenance only entitled to lookout if ‘relaying or repairing track’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Golden rule - Narrow Use

A
  • where a word has two possible meanings one would produce an absurd or unwanted outcome, the court could choose the most sensible meaning
  • R v Allen
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Allen

A
  • accused bigamy
  • offence literally impossible
  • judge interpret ‘marry’ as ‘to go through a ceremony of marriage’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Golden Rule - wide use

A
  • only 1 meaning -> repugnant/unwanted outcome -> golden rule alter meaning of word in order to avoid unwanted outcome + give effect to parliaments intentions
  • ie SIgworth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

sigsworth

A
  • son murdered mother prevented from inheriting mothers estate despite (‘next of kin’) -> didn’t want murderer to benefit from his crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Golden rule - KP

A
  • Cannot be used indp. -> need failing literal rule
  • challenge - identifying repugnant/absurd outcome
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

mischief rule

A

The rule allows the judge to see the law before Act passed to see what gap or ‘mischief’ the act was designed to cover. The court should then interpret the Act in such a way that the gap is covered (provide a remedy)
i.e smith v hughes
- Royal Court of Nursing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Smith V Hughes

A
  • street offences act 1958
  • ‘soliciting in the street’ did it count from window
  • Court said that the aim of
    Act allow
    people to walk along the
    streets without being
    solicited
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Royal College Nursing

A
  • consider wording Abortion Act 1967 - allowed “registered medical
    practitioners” to carry out abortions.
    -HL (SC) looked at the
    mischief Parliament was
    aiming to redress –
    illegal, “backstreet”
    abortions
  • that nurses supervising
    part of the procedure was
    not unlawful.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

purposive approach

A

It seeks to give effect to Parliament’s intentions when passing a new law. And so the wording should be interpreted in order to achieves those aims and reflects the “spirit” of the statute.
i.e Jones v Tower boot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Jones V Tower Boot

A

The Court of Appeal decided that racial
harassment by fellow workers was “in the course
of employment”, making the employer liable.
Parliament’s intention was to eliminate racism in
the workplace

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

intrinsic aids

A
  • within act
  • Long & short title
  • schedules
  • explanatory notes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

extrinsic aids

A
  • aids outside of act
  • Oxford dictionary from time law passed
  • Hansard
  • LCR
  • Precedent
  • HRA 1998
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Adv of golden rule

A
  • escape route to avoid absurdities
  • Uphold Parliament’s will
  • Respect’s parliament supremacy
  • Saves Parliamentary time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Adv of golden rule: escape route

A
  • escape route to avoid absurdities literal rule creates i.e R v Allen
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Disadv. Golden Rule

A
  • def absurd
  • J ttoo much power
  • unpredictable
  • ltd use -
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Disadv. Golden Rule: absurdities

A

-> subjective
->different meaning
-> otcome of cae dep. on judge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Disadv. Golden Rule: J too much pwr

A
  • J too much power
    -> lead to accusations judicial law making
    -> i.e Re sigworth Word (‘next of kin’) clear and unambiguous
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Disadv. Golden Rule - unpredictable

A
  • unpredictable - No guidance how/when -> hard to advise clients -. ‘an unpredictable safety valve’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Disadv. Golden Rule - ltd use

A
  • ltd use -. Use situation absurd/repugnant -> rare -> feeble parachute
23
Q

Adv of golden rule: uphold Parliaments will

A
  • Uphold Parliament’s will
    -> assume Parliament never intends to pass absurd law -
    > Re Sigsworth
24
Q

Adv of golden rule: respects Parliament supremacy

A
  • Respect’s parliament supremacy
    -> only response to failure of literal rule
    -> judge not complete freedom
    – respect words parliament chose
25
Q

Adv of golden rule: save Parliament time

A

e
- Saves Parliamentary time
-> no minor change in amending Act i.e Adler V George (‘vicinity’ inc. being inside prohibited place)

26
Q

Adv of Literal rule

A
  • Respects PS
    -SofP
  • Legal certainty & predictability
  • precision -
27
Q

Adv of Literal rule: respect PS

A

-> folllow words by Parliament
-> democratic elected

28
Q

Adv of Literal rule: Separation of Powers

A

-> P law making body
-> right J apply law exactly as written -> J unelected

29
Q

Adv of literal rule: Legal certainty & predictability

A

-> interpreted as written
-> lawyers advise clients confidently - reduce litigation

30
Q

Adv of literal Rule: Precision

A

encourage accurcy of P
-> clar, precise & plain meaning
_> understood + interpreted by anyone
-> fairness + same application

31
Q

Dis. of Literal Rule

A
  • absurd results
  • undermines parliament’s intention
  • unrealistic
32
Q

Dis of literal rule: absurd results

A

-> harsh Berriman
-> absurd whiteley v chappell

33
Q

Dis literal rule: undermines Parliaments intention

A

> Fisher V Bell and cheesman not achieve what parliament wanted
-> required to interpret in way consistent w/ HRA which favours more purposive approach

34
Q

Dis literal rule: unrealistic

A

-> expects impossible level of perfection
-> literal meaning of word w/out due weight of context
-> Zander ‘mechanical & divorced from realities of the use of language’

35
Q

Adv Mischief rule

A
  • promotes purpose of law
  • Avoids absurd & unjust outcomes -
  • Flexibility -
  • mischief filled
36
Q

Adv Mischief rule: promote purpose of law

A

-> remedy parliament chose
-> save PT
-> smith V Hughes
-> reform & improve each law to tackle ‘mischief ‘

37
Q

Adv Mischief rule: avoid absurd + unjust outcomes

A
  • blackstone said ‘the fairest and most rational method of interpretation’
38
Q

Adv Mischief rule: flexibility

A

-> change social + Tech conditions
i.e RCOfN

39
Q

Adv Mischief rule: mischief filled

A

-> respectful of Parliamentary sovereignty than purposive
-> looks for defect in law and use remedy parliament chose

40
Q

disadv. Mischief rule

A

-judicial law making
- uncertianty
- Difficult identify Parliaments intention
- ltd. than purposive approach

41
Q

disadv. Mischief rule: judicial law making

A
  • RCofN -> ignore words act -> undermine PS + SepofPwrs
42
Q

disadv. Mischief rule: uncertainty

A

> dif. conclusions & own predjudices
-> difficult for lawyerss to advise clients
-> smith V hughes

43
Q

disadv. Mischief rule: difficult to identify parliament’s intention

A

-> ‘mischief’ difficukt to estab
+ judge hampered by extrinsic aid inavailability i.e hansard

44
Q

disadv. Mischief rule:: more ltd. than purposive approach

A

-> cnnot general cosideration of the purpose of the law -> purpose is more appropriate to modern acts -> make mischief rule redundant

45
Q

adv Purposive approach

A
  • Justice in individual cases
  • Flexibility
  • Allows discretion
  • more approapriate to Modern AofP
46
Q

adv Purposive approach: justice in indv cases

A

-> law covers more sit. than literal int. i.e Jones V Tower Boot

47
Q

adv Purposive approach: flexibility

A

law adapt changing social + tech. adv. (Quintavelle cloning not possible when Gov. passed Act)

48
Q

adv Purposive approach: allows discretion

A

avoid harsh + destructive analysis of lang. and absurdities + injusticices

49
Q

adv Purposive approach: more apropriate to Modern AofP

A

-> further, more generalised consideration than Michief rule

50
Q

Dis Purposive approach

A
  • Judicial law making
  • Difficult to judge intention
  • uncertainty
51
Q

Dis Purposive approach: Judicial Law making

A

purpose of act
-> J too much power
-> ignore clear words of Parliament & against d of PS + SP i.e ex parte smith (deny applicant right to birth certificate)

52
Q

Dis Purposive approach: Difficult to Judge intention

A

-> can only be applied if found
-> rely on extrinsic aids in particular hansard
-> delays + cost

53
Q

Dis Purposive approach: uncertainty

A

diff. to advise clients

OCR A-level law PAPER " SECTION A (6 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions