Statutory Interpretation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

The dangerous dogs act 1991

A

“Any dog of the type known as the pit bull terrier”
What meant by type?
Brock v DPP - type had wider meaning than breed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Brock v DPP

A

Type had greater meaning than breed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Literal rule

A

Words have plain, ordinary meaning even if outcome absurd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v judge of the city of London court

A

‘If words of the act are clear then you must follow them even though they lead to manifest absurdity’
Whitley v Chappell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Whiteley v Chappell

A

Charged with impersonating someone to vote
Not guilty - wording ‘any person entitled to vote’ - dead person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fisher v bell

A

Flick knife, shop window
S.1(1) restriction of offensive weapons act 1959
Decide if “offered knife for sale” - ITT no offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Fisher v bell

A

Flick knife, shop window
S.1(1) restriction of offensive weapons act 1959
Decide if “offered knife for sale” - ITT no offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Pros of literal rule

A
  • respect parliamentary sovereignty
  • extrinsic aids to help (dictionary) clarify meaning, help implement
  • avoids judges going beyond role, democratic process
  • certainty in the law - prepare for cases properly, follow what is said
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cons of literal rule

A
  • absurd result - fisher v bell, whiteley v Chappell
  • golden rule more appropriate
  • assumes craftsmen perfect, dangerous dogs cause confusion
  • can be more than one dictionary definition
  • statutes cannot cover every situation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Golden rule

A

Starts with literal rule, allowed to avoid interpretation that would lead to absurd result
Can choose between two possible meanings (narrow approach)
Or if result absurd - modify words of statute (broad approach)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Jones v dpp

A

Can choose between two meanings if arises (narrow approach)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Allen

A

S. 57 offences against the person act 1861 - offence to marry whilst original spouse still alive
“Marry” can also mean go through a ceremony of marriage
Narrow approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Alder v George

A

D charged obstructing member of armed forces “in vicinity of prohibited place”
Argued in place not vicinity - interpreted to include in
Broad approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Narrow approach

A

Choose between two possible meanings of word

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Narrow approach

A

Choose between two possible meanings of word

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Broad approach

A

Modify words of statute if have absurd outcome

17
Q

Re:sigsworth

A

Wide approach
Allow defendant to inherit mother’s estate (had murdered mother)
Interpret act to say if next of kin caused death couldn’t inherit

18
Q

Mischief rule

A

Court can see what law passed before act - discover what gap to cover - interpret act in that way

19
Q

Heydon’s case 1584

A

Consider:
- common law before act
- defect or mischief remedy not provided for
- what remedy does act attempt to provide so as to cure defect
- true reason for remedy

20
Q

Smith v Hughes

A

S.1 (1) street offences act 1959 “shall be offence for common podtitute to loiter or solicit in street or public place for pourpose of prostitution”
Balcony + windows - attracting attention - aim to keep streets ‘clean’
Appeal rejected

21
Q

Royal college of nursing v DHSS

A

Abortion Act 1967 ‘terminated by registered medical practitioner’
AIM to avoid illegal ones - meant to cover doctors and nurses -

22
Q

Purposive approach

A

Judges deciding what they believe parliament meant to achieve

23
Q

R v registrar-general ex parte smith

A

s.51 Adoption act 1976 states Registrar-general supply on application by adopted person give information that enables that person to obtain copy of birth certificate
Smith applied - convicted murderer, wanted to murder birth mother
R-g did not have to supply information - parliament would not have intended to promote serious harm

24
Q

Jones v tower boot co.

A

ÇA took meaning of race relations act to Aim to get rid of discrimination in work place - employers held liable - persuasive approach

25
Q

Internal aids

A

Long/short act title
Preamble/objectives/purposes section - e.g theft act 1968 states act to modernise law of theft
Schedules
Definition section
Punctuation
Marginal notes explaining sections (not normally intentions of parliament

26
Q

External aids

A

Dictionaries published at time of the act
Previous acts eg interpretation act 1978
Reports of law reform bodies
Hansard - official report of what said in parliament - pepper v hart - could be used by judges in limited way e.g when words ambiguous, obscure or lead to absurdity
International treaties
Textbooks