Statutory interpretation Flashcards

1
Q

What is statutory interpretation

A

Where judges give meaning to words of an act of parliament when they are delivering a judgement in court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What must judges find and declare

A

They must find the correct law and declare it as written by parliament however they can determine the correct meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the 4 rules

A

Literal, golden, mischief, purposive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the literal rule

A

Judge reads the statute as a whole and puts the words into context using their plain, ordinary, grammatical meaning regardless of what the outcome is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did lord ester state about the literal rule

A

‘if the words of the act are clear then you must follow them even if they lead to a manifest absurdity’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the two cases that are examples of the literal rule

A

Fisher v Bell
Whitely v Chappel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What happened in Whitley v Chappel

A

D charged under the Act when it made it
an offence to impersonate someone
‘entitled to vote’. D impersonated a dead
man and argued that the dead man was
not ‘entitled to vote’. Court held D was not guilty as the literal
meaning of the words were applied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happened in Fisher v Bell

A

Shopkeeper displayed a flick knife displayed in his shop with a price tag on it. The Restrictions of Offensive Weapons
Act 1969 made it an offence to ‘offer’ such flick knives for safe. Under contract law, goods displayed in shops are not ‘offers’ but ’invitations to treat’. Court held that D was not guilty as literal rule applied to the offence and shop keeper has not committed an offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Advantages of the literal rule

A

Words of parliament, Respects separation of powers, Makes the law more certain, Makes them clear when considering the words in the act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Disadvantages of the literal rule

A

Cannot take into account different situations, Assumes everything is perfectly worded, Words can have more than one meaning, Can demand ureal perfection of wording

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the golden rule

A

Looks at the literal meaning of the words but the judge is then allowed to avoid an interpretation that would lead to an absurd result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the two approaches within the golden rule

A

Narrow and braod

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the narrow approach

A

Court chooses a possible meaning of the words but if there’s only one meaning it must be given

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the case for the narrow approach

A

R v Allen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What happened in R v Allen

A

D attempted to marry the niece of his first
wife (whilst he was still married). Not a valid marriage due to close relationship of the 2 women. He was charges under s57
OAPA 1861 offence to get married before
the previous marriage ended. D argued
that he could not be charged as his 2nd
marriage was ‘void’. Court held used narrow approach and decided ‘shall marry’ to be interpreted as going through a ceremony and D was guilty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the broad approach

A

If a clear meaning of the words would lead to an absurd result the judge will modify the meaning of the words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the case for the broad approach

A

Sigsworth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What happened in the case of Sigsworth

A

A son had murdered his mother. Mother had made a will which meant murderer son would have inherited her estate. There was no ambiguity in the Act but the courts could not let a murderer benefit from a crime, so the broad approach was used. Held: Court wrote into the Act that the D was not entitled to inherit where they had
killed the deceased.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Advantages of the golden rule

A

Respect parliaments words, Can choose a sensible meaning, Remove repugnant situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Disadvantages of the golden rule

A

Not always possible to predict when this approach will occur and it cannot do too much

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the mischief rule

A

Judge looks at the gap in the law before the act was passed and interprets the words which have been used to cover that re existing gap

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What 4 points should be consideredfor the mischief rule

A

What was the common law before the making of the act, what was the mischief the common law did not provide, what was the remedy parliament gave and the true reason for the remedy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What case sets out the 4 points

A

Hayden’s case

24
Q

What are the 2 cases that support the mischief rule

A

Smith v Hughes
Royal colloge of nursing v DHSS

25
What happened in Smith V Hughes
The defendants were prostitutes who had been charged under the Street Offences Act 1959 which made it an offence to solicit in a public place. The prostitutes were soliciting from private premises in windows or on balconies so could be seen by the public. Held: The court applied the mischief rule holding that the activities of the D’s were within the mischief the Act was aimed at even though under a literal interpretation they would be in a private place.
26
What happened in the case of Royal college of nursing v DHSS
The Royal College of Nursing brought an action challenging the legality of the involvement of nurses in carrying out abortions. The OAPA Act 1861 makes it an offence for any person to carry out an abortion. The Abortion Act 1967 provided that it would be an absolute defence for a medically registered practitioner (ie a doctor) to carry out abortions provided certain conditions were satisfied. Advances in medical science meant surgical abortions were largely replaced with hormonal abortions and it was common for these to be administered by nurses. Held: it was legal for nurses to carry out such abortions. The Act was aimed at doing away with back street abortions where no medical care was available. The actions of the nurses were therefore outside the mischief.
27
Advantages of the mischief rule
Allows judges to look at the gaps and form a 'just result', Law commissions preference and what is recommended in statutory interpretations
28
Disadvantages of the mischief rule
Lead to uncertainty, Difficult to interpret, Risk of judicial law making, Not all judges agree with this law as there was a spit decision in the nursing case, Limited to only looking at the gap
29
What is the purposive approach
As well as looking at the gap in the law they also acknowledge what parliaments intention was
30
What must you look at with the purposive approach
Current social context and perceive what they wated to stop or change in the current situation
31
What cases should you use for the purposive approach
R v Registrar General ex parte Smith Jones v Tower Boot co
32
What happened in R v Registrar General ex parte Smith
Under the Adoption Act 1976, an adopted person over 18 could apply for a copy of his birth certificate. Smith applied in the correct manner. The problem was that he was convicted of two murders and detained at Broadmoor suffering from a psychotic illness. It was suggested he wanted to find out who his real mother was in order to kill her. Held: HOL used purposive approach information not given as Parliament could not have intended to promote a serious crime.
33
What happened in Jones v Tower Boot co
A young black worker was physically and verbally abused at work (by fellow workers). He sued employers, argued that they were responsible for their actions. Employer argued the abuse was not part of the job and outside ‘course of employment’. Held: COA ruled using purposive approach, Parliament's intent to eliminate workplace discrimination. Employers were held liable.
34
Advantages of the purposive rule
Take into account modern technology, Fill in gaps left by parliament, 'Just decisions' can be made
35
Disadvantages of the purposive rule
Undemocratic, Parliament have o accountability for the decisions in court, Time consuming, Uncertain,
36
What are aids
Sources that help decide what parliament means
37
What are the 2 types of aids
Intrinsic and extrinsic
38
Intrinsic aids definition
Items within the statute to help make the meaning of words clearer
39
Examples of intrinsic aids
Short title, Preamble, Long title, Headings, Schedules, Marginal notes and interpretative sections
40
What is the preamble
Sets out parliaments purpose in acting statute
41
What is the long title
Explains briefly parliaments intentions
42
What is the short title
The long title helps you to understand the short title
43
What are headings
They are above each sections that state what is coming up
44
What is a schedule
Attached to the act that shows how everything was created
45
What are marginal notes
Explains the different sections and have helpful comments placed in by the reader
46
What is the interpretative section
Statement of principles that encourage the use of the purposive approach
47
Extrinsic aids definition
Items outside an act which may help a judge find the meaning of words
48
Examples of extrinsic aids
Prelegislative documents, Previous acts, Dictionaries, Academic books, Hansard, Law commission reports, International treaties and interpretation act 1978
49
What are Prelegislative documents
Green paper, white paper and draft bill which all have the early outline of the law
50
What are previous acts
Look at things on the same topic and fins similarities and differences
51
What are dictionaries
Look at them from when the act was passed to see the definition of the word
52
What are academic books
On similar topics that can help you understand the concept
53
What is a Hansard
official report of what was said in parliament
54
What are the law commission reports
Look to see what the gap in the legislation is based upon
55
What are international treaties
Find the true meaning from where it was originally lost
56
What is the interpretation act 1978
Has definitions of certain words that are used in legislation
57
What impact on the purposive approach have other countries had
Other countries prefer to use this approach when interpreting legislation so it encouraged English judges to do the same