Statue of Frauds Flashcards
Restatement § 110 Classes of Contracts Covered Classes of Contracts
(1) The following classes of contracts are subject to a statute, commonly called the Statute of Frauds, forbidding enforcement unless there is a written memorandum or an applicable exception:
(a) a contract of an executor or administrator to answer for a duty of his decedent (the executor-administrator provision);
(b) a contract to answer for the duty of another (the suretyship provision);
(c) a contract made upon consideration of marriage (the marriage provision);
(d) a contract for the sale of an interest in land (the land contract provision);
(e) a contract that is not to be performed within one year from the making thereof (the one-year provision).
Restatement § 110 Classes of Contracts Covered Classes of Contracts Under the UCC
(2) The following classes of contracts, which were traditionally subject to the Statute of Frauds, are now governed by Statute of Frauds provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code:
(a) a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more (Uniform Commercial Code § 2-201);
(b) a contract for the sale of securities (Uniform Commercial Code § 8-319);
(c) a contract for the sale of personal property not otherwise covered, to the extent of enforcement by way of action or defense beyond $5,000 in amount or value of remedy (Uniform Commercial Code § 1-206).
(3) In addition the Uniform Commercial Code requires a writing signed by the debtor for an agreement which creates or provides for a security interest in personal property or fixtures not in the possession of the secured party.
Restatement § 110 Classes of Contracts Covered Sufficient Evidence
(4) Statutes in most states provide that no acknowledgment or promise is sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract to take a case out of the operation of a statute of limitations unless made in some writing signed by the party to be charged, but that the statute does not alter the effect of any payment of principal or interest.
(5) In many states other classes of contracts are subject to a requirement of a writing.
Restatement § 110 Classes of Contracts Covered Classes of Contracts
A and B orally agree to marry three years later.
The contract is unenforceable because not to be performed within a year, even though it is excepted from the provision for contracts in consideration of marriage.
Restatement § 129 Action in Reliance; Specific Performance
A contract for the transfer of an interest in land may be specifically enforced notwithstanding failure to comply with the Statute of Frauds if it is established that the party seeking enforcement, in reasonable reliance on the contract and on the continuing assent of the party against whom enforcement is sought, has so changed his position that injustice can be avoided only by specific enforcement.
Restatement § 129 Action in Reliance; Specific Performance
A and B agree by an unsigned writing that A will sell Blackacre to B for $5,000. B pays the price to A as agreed, and A accepts the payment but refuses to transfer the land as agreed.
B is not entitled to specific performance, but can recover the amount of the payment.
Restatement § 129 Action in Reliance; Specific Performance
A orally leases A’s farm to B for five years, agreeing that B will repair the premises at prevailing wages to be credited on the rent. B takes possession of the farm and does $1,000 worth of repair work, using material furnished by A. A then seeks to evict B.
B is entitled to $1,000 less the fair rental of the farm for the period of his occupancy, but is not entitled to specific performance or damages.
Restatement § 129 Action in Reliance; Specific Performance
A and B make an oral agreement for the sale of Blackacre by A to B. With A’s consent B takes possession of the land, pays part of the price, builds a dwelling house on the land and occupies it. Two years later, as a result of a dispute over the amount still to be paid, A repudiates the agreement.
B may obtain a decree of specific performance.
Restatement § 129 Action in Reliance; Specific Performance
A orally promises to make a gift of Blackacre to his son B and puts B in possession. With A’s consent B builds a dwelling house on the land and lives in it for twenty years until A dies, paying all taxes on the land.
B may obtain a decree of specific performance against A’s heir or personal representative.
Restatement § 130 Contract Not to Be Performed Within a Year
(1) Where any promise in a contract cannot be fully performed within a year from the time the contract is made, all promises in the contract are within the Statute of Frauds until one party to the contract completes his performance.
(2) When one party to a contract has completed his performance, the one-year provision of the Statute does not prevent enforcement of the promises of other parties.
Restatement § 130 Contract Not to Be Performed Within a Year Possibility of Performance Within One Year
A, an insurance company, orally promises to insure B’s house against fire for five years, B promising to pay the premium therefor within the week.
The contract is not within the Statute of Frauds, since if the house burns and the insurer pays within a year the contract will be fully performed.
Restatement § 130 Contract Not to Be Performed Within a Year Possibility of Performance Within One Year
A orally promises to work for B, and B promises to employ A during A’s life at a stated salary.
The promises are not within the one-year provision of the Statute, since A’s life may terminate within a year.
Restatement § 130 Contract Not to Be Performed Within a Year Possibility of Performance Within One Year
A and B, a railway, agree that A will provide grading and ties and B will construct a switch and maintain it as long as A needs it for shipping purposes. A plans to use it for shipping lumber from adjoining land which contains enough lumber to run a mill for 30 years, and uses the switch for 15 years.
The contract is not within the one-year provision of the Statute.
Restatement § 130 Contract Not to Be Performed Within a Year Possibility of Performance Within One Year
A orally promises B to sell him five crops of potatoes to be grown on a specified farm in Minnesota, and B promises to pay a stated price on delivery.
The contract is within the Statute of Frauds. It is impossible in Minnesota for five crops of potatoes to mature in one year.
Restatement § 130 Contract Not to Be Performed Within a Year Discharge Within a Year
A orally promises to work for B, and B promises to employ A for five years at a stated salary.
The promises are within the Statute of Frauds. Though the duties of both parties will be discharged if A dies within a year, the duties cannot be “performed” within a year. This conclusion is not affected by a term in the oral agreement that the employment shall terminate on A’s death.
Restatement § 130 Contract Not to Be Performed Within a Year Discharge Within a Year
A orally promises to work for B, and B promises to employ A for five years at a stated salary. The agreement provides that either party may terminate the contract by giving 30 days notice at any time.
The agreement is one of uncertain duration and is not within the one-year provision of the Statute.
Restatement § 130 Contract Not to Be Performed Within a Year Discharge Within a Year
A orally promises to work for B, and B promises to employ A for five years at a stated salary. The agreement provides that A may quit at any time.
The agreement is within the Statute.
Restatement § 130 Contract Not to Be Performed Within a Year Discharge Within a Year
A, the maternal grandmother of a new-born illegitimate child, agrees with B, the father, that A will care for the child and B will make support payments until the child becomes 21 years old.
The agreement is not within the one-year provision of the Statute. If the child dies within a year, the primary object of furnishing necessaries to the child will be fully “performed”.
Restatement § 130 Contract Not to Be Performed Within a Year Discharge Within a Year
A sells his grocery business to B, who pays part of the price and promises to pay the balance in a month, A agreeing orally not to engage in the grocery business in the same town for five years.
The contract is not within the one-year provision of the Statute, since A’s death within one year will give B the equivalent of full performance.
Restatement § 130 Contract Not to Be Performed Within a Year The One-Year Period Without consideration
A promises B that, so long as B buys through A B’s requirements for gasoline and A accepts B’s orders, A will pay B an amount equal to the discount other distributors would allow B. For several years A accepts orders from B.
A’s promise is not within the one-year provision, since a separate contract is made each time A accepts an order.
Restatement § 130 Contract Not to Be Performed Within a Year The One-Year Period
On December 1, 1966, A and B contract orally for A’s employment by B at a stated salary for a year beginning the following day.
The contract is not within the one-year provision, since the promised performance will be fully rendered before midnight of December 1, 1967.
Restatement § 130 Contract Not to Be Performed Within a Year The One-Year Period
On December 1, 1966, A and B enter into an oral contract for the employment of A at a stated salary for the calendar year 1967. On the first working day in 1967, A presents himself for work, says “I understand these are the terms on which I am to be employed,” and restates the terms. B replies, “That is right.”
Though the original contract was within the Statute of Frauds, the subsequent restatement makes a new contract performable within a year.