Statistics Flashcards
Define Confidence Interval
We are 95% confident that the true odds ratio/relative risk lies in our given range. If we were to repeat this test indefinitely, 95% of odds ratios/relative risk will lie between the CI
Define Odds Ratio
The ratio of the odds of the intervention compared with the odds of the control
OR = AD/BC
Define Relative Risk Ratio
The ratio of the risk of the intervention compared with the risk of the control
RRR = A(C+D)/(C(A+B))
Define p-value
This measures how likely it is that any observed difference between groups is due to chance.
In other words, the P value is the probability of seeing the observed results just by chance if there is genuinely no difference between the groups (null hypothesis is true).
A P-value of 0 indicates that the difference is not due to chance (the groups are different) and a value of 1 indicates that groups are the same (but there may be random variation)
Likelihood Ratios
LR+ = (Prob + test in diseased) / (Prob + test in nondiseased) LR+ = SEN / (1 - SPE)
LR- = (Prob - test in diseased) / (Prob - test in nondiseased) LR- = (1 - SEN) / SPE
Tests where the likelihood ratio lie close to 1 have little practical significance as the post-test probability (odds) is little different from the pre-test probability.
- A likelihood ratio of < 1 indicates the result is associated with absence of the disease
- A likelihood ratio of > 1 indicates the result is associated with the disease
Types of Evidence Based Studies
- Ecologic Study
- Case Study (individual)
- Case Report (several individuals)
- Cross-Sectional
- Case-Control Study
- Cohort Control
- Controlled Clinical Trial
- Intervention
- Randomised Controlled Trial
- Intervention
- Systemic Reviews
Define Ecologic Study
Concerning populations, not individuals
Define Case Study (individuals)
Individuals, profile of subjects for rare conditions
Define Case Report (several individuals)
Profile of several subjects
Define Cross-Sectional
Measure exposure AND disease at one point.
Opens up the possibility of the ecological fallacy, where group characteristics are inferences onto individuals. For example, most Australian’s are bogans. Therefore John, an Australian, is a bogan.
Define Case-Control Study
Outcome first then exposure.
Unfortunately the temporal relationship is unclear
Define Cohort Study
Exposure first then outcome.
The temporal relationship is clear
Systemic Review Types and Differences
Narrative vs Systemic
Narrative
- Lacks rigor
- Broad in scope
- Limited critical appraisal
- Broad summary of state of affairs
Systemic
- Rigorous-minimise bias
- Answers a specific PICO question
- Protocol
- Search strategy documented
- Quality of studies appraised according to set criteria
Systemic Review Bias Source
- Inclusion criteria
- Inadequate literature search
- Publication bias
- Inadequate assessment of study quality
Systemic Review Outcome Measurements
- Dichotomous outcomes
* RR, AR, OR and NNT- Continuous outcomes
- Weighted mean difference (outcomes on the same scale) or standardised mean difference (outcomes are conceptually the same, but on a different scale)
- Continuous outcomes