Statistics Flashcards

1
Q

Define Confidence Interval

A

We are 95% confident that the true odds ratio/relative risk lies in our given range. If we were to repeat this test indefinitely, 95% of odds ratios/relative risk will lie between the CI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define Odds Ratio

A

The ratio of the odds of the intervention compared with the odds of the control

OR = AD/BC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define Relative Risk Ratio

A

The ratio of the risk of the intervention compared with the risk of the control

RRR = A(C+D)/(C(A+B))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define p-value

A

This measures how likely it is that any observed difference between groups is due to chance.

In other words, the P value is the probability of seeing the observed results just by chance if there is genuinely no difference between the groups (null hypothesis is true).

A P-value of 0 indicates that the difference is not due to chance (the groups are different) and a value of 1 indicates that groups are the same (but there may be random variation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Likelihood Ratios

A
LR+ = (Prob + test in diseased) / (Prob + test in nondiseased)
LR+ = SEN / (1 - SPE)
LR- = (Prob - test in diseased) / (Prob - test in nondiseased)
LR- = (1 - SEN) / SPE

Tests where the likelihood ratio lie close to 1 have little practical significance as the post-test probability (odds) is little different from the pre-test probability.

  • A likelihood ratio of < 1 indicates the result is associated with absence of the disease
  • A likelihood ratio of > 1 indicates the result is associated with the disease
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Types of Evidence Based Studies

A
  • Ecologic Study
  • Case Study (individual)
  • Case Report (several individuals)
  • Cross-Sectional
  • Case-Control Study
  • Cohort Control
  • Controlled Clinical Trial
    • Intervention
  • Randomised Controlled Trial
    • Intervention
  • Systemic Reviews
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define Ecologic Study

A

Concerning populations, not individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define Case Study (individuals)

A

Individuals, profile of subjects for rare conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define Case Report (several individuals)

A

Profile of several subjects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define Cross-Sectional

A

Measure exposure AND disease at one point.

Opens up the possibility of the ecological fallacy, where group characteristics are inferences onto individuals. For example, most Australian’s are bogans. Therefore John, an Australian, is a bogan.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define Case-Control Study

A

Outcome first then exposure.

Unfortunately the temporal relationship is unclear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define Cohort Study

A

Exposure first then outcome.

The temporal relationship is clear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Systemic Review Types and Differences

A

Narrative vs Systemic

Narrative

  • Lacks rigor
  • Broad in scope
  • Limited critical appraisal
  • Broad summary of state of affairs

Systemic

  • Rigorous-minimise bias
  • Answers a specific PICO question
  • Protocol
  • Search strategy documented
  • Quality of studies appraised according to set criteria
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Systemic Review Bias Source

A
  • Inclusion criteria
    • Inadequate literature search
    • Publication bias
    • Inadequate assessment of study quality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Systemic Review Outcome Measurements

A
  • Dichotomous outcomes
    * RR, AR, OR and NNT
    • Continuous outcomes
      • Weighted mean difference (outcomes on the same scale) or standardised mean difference (outcomes are conceptually the same, but on a different scale)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define Statistical Heterogeneity and Homogeneity

A

Identifies whether individual studies within a meta-analysis are similar enough to validate a meaningful interpretation from the meta-analysis.

  • Statistical heterogeneity
    • Exists when there is greater variation between results in the trial than is compatible with chance
  • Statistical homogeneity (good sign)
    • Where the studies are similar enough for us to be able to combine them
17
Q

Measures of Statistical Heterogeneity

A
  • Chi-squared test
    * Used to assess statistical heterogeneity
    * If chi-squared > degrees of freedom -> evidence for heterogeneity (bad sign)
    • I-squared test
      • 70-100% indicates heterogeneity
      • < 70% indicates homogeneity
18
Q

Further Systemic Review Analyses

A
  • Sensitivity analyses
    * Examine how the results vary under different assumptions
    * E.g. Re-analysing data using low, medium and high studies
    • Subgroup analyses
      • Meta-analyses on subgroups of the studies
      • E.g. Sex, age and drug doses
19
Q

Difference between Testing and Screening

A
  • Testing
    * Testing in the presence of symptoms or to confirm the presence/absence of a disease
    • Screening
      • Testing in the absence of symptoms
        • Opportunistic (i.e. PSA test at a general check-up)
        • Selective (i.e. Mammography in women 50-69)
        • Mass screening (neonatal screening)
20
Q

Primary vs Secondary vs Tertiary Prevention

A

Primary Prevention
To prevent new diseases developing

Secondary Prevention
To find new diseases at an early stage

Tertiary Prevention
To minimise the effects of established disease(s)

21
Q

Benefits of Screening

A
  • Early detection of the disease
    • Early treatment of the disease
    • Psychological well being
22
Q

Limitations of Screening

A
  • Over-diagnosis (over treat)
    * The identification of slow growing cancers that may never have become apparent, ‘false positive’
    • Cannot detect interval disease
      • Interval cancers occur between screening as they are found in the time interval between screens. These can be overcome by
        • Increasing screening frequency (but this further increases over diagnosis)
    • False negative/positives
    • Side effects
23
Q

Screening Biases

A
  • Screening bias
    • Length-time bias
    • Lead-time bias
24
Q

Define Screening Bias

A

Participants in screening programmes tend to be healthier than those who don’t volunteer or comply

25
Q

Define Length-Time Bias

A

There may be different patterns of growth in the same disease. Screening is more likely to find slow growing tumours than rapidly growing ones.

26
Q

Define Lead-Time Bias

A

Lead time is the length of time between the detection of a disease and its usual clinical presentation. Lead-time bias e of the disease - it may appear to prolong survival but instead it just diagnoses earlier.