Statistics Flashcards

1
Q

Results are typically reported as:

A

Means
Or mean change (increase or decrease) from baseline
Proportion

Simple percentages
Risk ratio
Odds ratio

Time to an outcome
Survival curve
Hazard ratio

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a mean?

A

Continuous outcomes (e.g., blood pressure) (variable that can take on any value within a certain range)

Compare the average of the outcome between groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a proportion?

A

The fraction of the total that possesses the outcome

Compare the proportion that have the outcome between groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the absolute risk reduction or absolute risk difference?

A

The absolute difference between the probability of the event in the control group and probability of the event in the intervention group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the ARD tell us?

A

The proportion of outcome in the intervention group is a % lower than the proportion of the outcome in the placebo group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Is the ARD always negative?

A

No - Needs to be interpreted as the outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is relative risk?

A

Dichotomous outcomes (did an outcome occur – yes or no?)

Shows what the “risk” of the outcome in the intervention group is compared to the risk in the control group

Probability of event (intervention group) /Probability of event (control group)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does the relative risk tell us?

A

RR = 1.0 No difference in risk between groups

RR < 1.0 Less risk of outcome in intervention group

RR > 1.0 Higher risk of outcome in intervention group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the relative risk reduction or increase?

A

The degree to which baseline risk is reduced (or increased) by the intervention

RRR = 1 – RR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does the RRR tells us?

A

The intervention inreaces/decrease the risk of the outcome by ____%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the odds ratio?

A

Shows the odds of the outcome occurring in the intervention group compared to the control group

Odds = probability (risk) of having event /
probability (risk) of not having event

OR = odds (intervention group)/
odds (control group)

OR is usually close to the RR (if the outcome rate is low)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is told to us by the odds ratio?

A

OR = 1.0 No difference in odds between groups
OR < 1.0 Less odds of outcome in intervention group
OR > 1.0 Higher odds of outcome in intervention group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the NNT?

A

Number of subjects who would have to be treated (receive the intervention) in order for one additional subject to “benefit” in comparison to the control

Must take into account the duration of the study

NNT = 100/ARD (%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does the NNT tell us?

A

We need to tx ___ # of subjects for (length of study) in order to prevent the outcome in one additional person compared to the control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the NNH?

A

Number of patients who would be treated before you see one additional subject with an adverse event compared to control

Find the ARD of an adverse effect between groups

NNH = 100
ARD (%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does the NNH tell us?

A

We need to treat x number of subjects with Drug X for …(length of study) in order for one additional adverse effect to occur compared to the control

17
Q

What is a survival analysis?

A

Kaplan-Meier survival curves

Compares how long it takes subjects in each group to reach the outcome (have a stroke)
Often reported as “median survival time”
–> Time for half of the subjects to reach the outcome (the one we are evaluating)
–> p-value will tell you if there’s a statistically significant difference between the groups

Can flip the curve, just means the amount of people that have experience the outcome

18
Q

What does the hazard ratio tell us?

A

HR = 1.0 No difference in hazard between groups
HR < 1.0 Less hazard of outcome in intervention group
HR > 1.0 Higher hazard of outcome in intervention group

19
Q

What is a confidence interval?What does the size of the C.I. indicate?

A

Range where the true effect of the intervention (treatment) lies
The narrower the CI, the more precise the results
Increase sample size = increase precision

  • Best case and worst-case scenario
20
Q

What does the C.I> tell us?

A

The true value of risk reduction will lie between the best and worst case scenarion 95% of the time

21
Q

Why are C.I. beneficial?

A

CI can show us the magnitude of the effect
Best-case…worst-case scenario

CI can show us if there really is a difference (statistical significance)
If the CI crosses the threshold for “no difference”, then the result is not statistically significant
For means or proportions: no difference = 0
For relative risk or odds ratio: no difference = 1

22
Q

What is better: P-value or C.I.?

A

Reporting CI is becoming more common/required

CI show us the range in the actual data measurements (e.g., mmHg for blood pressure)

CI shows us the direction of the effect, p-value just indicates if a difference exists

CI can help distinguish between clinical and statistical significance

23
Q

What is the difference in proving efficacy?

A

Superiority
Want to show an intervention is better than control (active/placebo)
Is there a statistically significant / clinically relevant difference between groups?

Non-inferiority
Is the new intervention not substantially worse than an established intervention?

Equivalence (rarely done)
Is the new intervention neither worse nor better than an established intervention?
E.g. Bioequivalence Study

24
Q

What is a non-inferiority trial? Why do we want to do these?

A

Clinical trial to establish that an intervention is not clinically worse than a comparison by more than a pre-determined margin

When would we want to do this?
- Show that something is not substantially worse
- Cost could be benefit
– Different dosage forms (injection od vs 1w) –> New drug (sacrifice a bit of efficacy, but I have a benefit in no a/e/liver toxicity, safer/tolerability, convenience

25
Q

How does one design a non-inferiority trial?

A

Same design considerations as superiority trials for inclusion/exclusion criteria, randomization, blinding, outcomes…

Non-inferiority margin determined a priori
–:> predetermined threshold or limit set before conducting a study to evaluate the non-inferiority
Should be decided based on a combination of statistical reasoning and clinical judgement

26
Q

How can one interpret a non-ionferiority trial?

A

ITT and per-protocol analyses should be done and reported

If just ITT reported, it can bias towards showing non-inferiority if lots of participants are lost to follow-up or have protocol violations

ITT preferred

Confidence intervals are key

27
Q

Interpretation of non-inferiority?

A

Study graph

28
Q

Whats the difference between non-inferiorty and superiority?

A

Once non-inferiority is established, an analysis for potential superiority can be conducted (should be pre-specified in protocol)

Lack of superiority in a superiority trial design, does not mean non-inferiority, and cannot claim non-inferiority

29
Q

What is a propensity score?

A

The probability that a subject would be in a particular treatment (study) group based on their observed baseline characteristics

30
Q

How do we use a propensity score to sort subjects?

A

Use propensity score for:

Matching, Stratification, Covariate Adjustment, Weighting

31
Q

What is the value of propensity scores?

A

Goal is to mimic RCTs by balancing observed characteristics (covariates) between study groups

Helps to reduce selection bias and confounding in observational studies

Doesn’t replace the value of randomization!

32
Q

What is an adaptive clinical trial?

A

A clinical trial design that allows for prospectively planned modifications to one or more aspects of the design based on accumulating data from subjects in that trial

33
Q

Describe the adaptive clinical trial design

A

GRAPH

34
Q

Give an example of a pre-planned change and its benefit?

A

Adjusting sample size
-Prevent underpowered studies (waste of time/resources)
-Prevent unnecessary exposure to subjects

Stopping treatment arms/groups
-Prevent unnecessary exposure to useless/harmful treatment
-Prevent wasting resources and time

35
Q

Adaptive clinical trial should have:
What is an issue with this?

A

Should have pre-planned all the interim analyses and potential modifications

Interim data analyses – potential for operational bias
Researchers, patients, scientific community behave differently if results known

Statistical analyses (design and results) more complex