Stat Flashcards
What is Berkson bias
admission rate bias results from a difference in the rates of admission of cases and controls due to the influence of the exposure. E.g. In a case-control study of smoking and dementia, the association will tend to be weaker (or even absent) if controls are selected from a hospital population (because smoking causes many diseases resulting in hospitalization) rather than from the community.
Neyman bias
incidence-prevalence bias. While ascertaining causation, one must look for an association between a risk factor and incidence – not prevalence. If a case- control study evaluates a risk factor that makes a person die quickly, then this will be underrepresented if ‘prevalent cases’ are studied instead of ‘incident cases’.
Response bias
when persons who respond to an invitation to participate in a study differ systematically from those who do not respond. The ‘healthy volunteers’ are often healthier than the general population. This is particularly relevant when evaluating screening tests.
Lead time bias
Lead-time is defined as the difference in time between the date of diagnosis with screening and the date of diagnosis without screening. Unless lead time is accounted for, survival time should not be compared to an unscreened control group of patients. Otherwise, the increase in survival time due solely to the advanced date of diagnosis will result in lead-time bias.
Diagnostic purity bias
Diagnostic purity bias refers to the exclusion of comorbidities resulting in a non-representative sample, especially problematic in RCTs.
Types of measurement bias (6-8)
a. Recall bias: Subjects often recall risk factors differently depending on their disease status. Case-control studies are particularly vulnerable to this type of bias.
b. Reporting bias results when a larger percentage of either case or control subjects are reluctant to report an exposure due to attitudes, perceptions or other concerns
c. Observer bias can occur whenever a researcher either knowingly or unknowingly evaluates a variable depending on the status of the individual under study. For e.g. when the research observer knows that a subject is on placebo, he may rate him higher on depression in a trial.
d. Surveillance bias: Disease may be better ascertained in a monitored population than in the general population
e. Work up bias (verification bias): During assessment of validity of a diagnostic test, the execution of the gold standard test may be influenced by the results of the assessed new instrument; e.g. the reference test may be less frequently performed when the test result is negative.
f. Misclassification bias: In extreme cases measurement bias may lead to misclassification. Cases may be misclassified as controls or ‘exposed group’ may be misclassified as ‘non- exposed’. Such misclassification amounts to bias only if it is differential i.e. one-sided. Errors in measurement instruments may lead to non-differential misclassification (both sides are affected equally), which often leads to a reduction in the observed magnitude of association rather than producing biased results.
g. Desirability bias – patients may choose socially desirable answers to provide during data collection, distorting the true picture. This leads to reporting bias.
h. Hawthorne effect refers to observed respondents minimizing perceived deviation from the norm. Occurs especially in cross- sectional surveys using questionnaires.
What are used for fixed effect statistics
Mantel-haenszel and Peto ratios
MH: useful even when Wie diff exist between individual studies in ratios of the size of two groups
Peto use for for RCT
What s a fixed effect analysis
Inference is restricted o include set of studies, assumes only random error with in studies could explain observed differences
Ignored between study variation
Random effects analysis
Each study shows a diff effect which are normally distributed around true mean
Assumption gives proportionally greater weight which are normally distributed around the true mean
How to calculate heterogeneity
Q stats.
Heterogeneity can b judged graphically via
Forest Plot & L’Abbé plot
What is Cochran’s q
calculated as the weighted sum of squared differences between individual
study effects and the pooled effect across studies.
How to detect publication bias
Funnel plot
Fail safe n
Wad is a blobbogram
Forest plot
presents the effect (point estimate) from each individual study as a blob or square (the measured effect), with a horizontal line (usually the 95% confidence interval, indicating the precision) across the blob.
Retrospective study advantages
It is mostly useful to study outcomes which are rare
It is mostly useful in diseases where exposure is common
Work up bias (verification bias)
systematic error in the assessment of the validity of a diagnostic test. When the execution of the gold standard is influenced by the results of the assessed test, especially when the reference test is less frequently performed when the assessed test result is negative, then this will influence the number of false negatives correctly identified in the exercise. This bias is specific to assessment of diagnostic tests and so not seen in ordinary case-control studies where cases and controls are determined before estimates of exposure begin.
Relative risk is a
Attributable risk
Ratio, it can have values less than 1, but not less than 0.
Attributable risk is an absolute risk difference it can be less than zero when the risk in exposed is less than the risk in non-exposed. Both attributable risk and relative risk are measures of differences between groups - while the former is an absolute difference, the latter is a ratio. The odds ratio is a cross produc
minimisation schemes
next allocation depends on characteristics of those already allocated. Allocation of each participant aims to ensure a balance of prognostic factors between groups. The disadvantage is that this method is inferior to proper randomisation as it allocation is somewhat exposed and ‘controlled’ manually.
Hills criteria for causality
consistency, specificity, temporality and biological gradient (dose-response relationship). Consistency refers to the association being repeatedly observed in studies performed by different persons, in different settings, among different populations and using different methods. If a specific exposure can be isolated from others and associated with a specific disease, then such specificity supports causality. This is perhaps the most difficult criterion to fulfill because in practice many exposures (e.g., cigarettes or radiation) are associated with multiple effects and specific diseases often have more than one cause. Temporality refers to time relationship between cause and effect: the factor believed to have caused the disease must have occurred prior to disease development.
Which of the following can be used to demonstrate the validity of a qualitative study?
The degree of reflexivity in a qualitative study is used as a method of assessing the validity of the study. Other methods include triangulation, respondent checking and deviant case analysis.
Wad is Ethnography
involves immersing oneself in a particular social group.
Reflexivity
process of “benign introspection” which involves thinking about how the researcher’s own experiences may have influenced the data collection and interpretation in a qualitative study.
Weighting
significance attached to each study based on sample size, precision, external validity (the extent to which results are generalisable) and methodological quality.
In which of the following situations a random effects analysis is indicated in a meta-analysis?
A fixed effects model assumes that all the studies share the same common treatment effect while a random effects model assumes that they do not share the same common treatment effect. In fixed effect analysis the inference is restricted to included set of studies. It assumes that only random error within studies could explain observed differences. It ignores between-study variations (hence heterogeneity). So this can be applied only if heterogeneity can be safely excluded by testing for it. Random effects analysis assumes that each study shows a different effect which are normally distributed around true mean. This assumption gives proportionally greater weight to smaller studies. Hence this model is susceptible to publication bias and results in wider less precise confidence intervals.
The correct answer is: Presence of statistical heterogeneity
Who coin the meta analysis
Gene glass
1976