Stalin’s Rule, Economy and Society 1929-1941 Flashcards
1
Q
What were the characteristics of Soviet agriculture, 1921-1928?
A
- relations quite good between state and peasantry
- peasants paid taxes (prodnalog), but also sold through NEPMEN
- Party more urban concentrated, less rural interference
- Tensions with rise of Stalin
- remained an agriculture based society.
2
Q
What were the successes in agriculture?
A
- grain output up by 34 tonnes from 1921-1925
- 1921= famine 1923= enough food
- increase party support for peasantry
- was doing better than industry.
3
Q
What were the failures in agriculture?
A
- grain production 1/2 of 1913 level
- 23 mil peasant households farming in primitive ways
- grain exports, 1/20th of 1913 level
- did not produce enough extra food to sell abroad
4
Q
Why were tensions emerging?
A
- unhappy with peasants owning land (against collective ownership)
- grain collection rate fell by 1928
- led to forcible seizure (Ural-Siberian Method)
- Ideology: right wanted increased taxes on rich peasantry, left wanted industrialisation
- Stalin: holding back USSR, wipe out capitalism in country side, industrialisation.
5
Q
IMPACT OF COLLECTIVISATION ON THE KULAKS AND OTHER PEASANTS.
A
Reasons for on paper.
6
Q
How did Dekulakisation begin?
A
- 1928 in shakty
- used context of show trials and propaganda
- denouncing of fictitious parties e.g. ‘labouring peasant party’
- 1930 mir (peasant councils) abolished
- same time as attack on Orthodox Church
7
Q
What was the peasant response?
A
- civil war in country side, Ukrainian peasants hostile
- 1930: 25-30% of cattle, pigs and sheep slaughtered, rather kill then give grain
- burned farms and crops.
- plough and farm animals eaten, 18mil horses
8
Q
What happened to Kulaks?
A
- 1.8mil deported to collectives
- 10mins died due to resistance
- 390,000 sent to Labour camps
9
Q
What was the knock on effect on collectives?
A
- worked: 85.3 mil tonnes produced, 71.7mil tonnes year before
- 55% of peasantry in collectives by 1930, in 2 months
- internal passports to prevent peasants fleeing.
10
Q
What was the overall impact?
A
- collectivisation improved productivity, for selling for industrialisation
- negatively effected the lives of the peasantry
- successfully removed hated Kulaks.
11
Q
MORE ON COLLECTIVISATION + HOLODOMOR
A
12
Q
Important statistics:
A
1934- 70% of farms are collectives
1941- 100% of farms are collectives
13
Q
Types of Collectives: Kolkhoz
A
- combination of small, individual farms
- around 75 families
- some had schools/clinics
- had to deliver set quota of 40%
- left-overs shared based on ‘Labour days’ worked
- each had a communist party chairman
- internal passports, to prevent fleeing.
14
Q
Types of Collectives: Sovkhoz
A
- literally means ‘state farm’
- seen as ideal farming by communists
- labourers are workers not peasants, paid state wage (low)
- also restricted their movement
- Many returned to being Kolkhozes in 1930s, due to resentment on wages
15
Q
What Mechanisation was occurring?
A
- Labour shifted towards cities
- modernisation of methods
- Machine Tractor Stations (MTS) set up 1931, hire out machinery
- 2500 tractors but 1 for every 40 collectives
- skewed in favour of state farms
- 1938: 72% of ploughing, 48% of harvesting mechanised
- many jobs still intensive, weeding
- 196,000 trucks in USSR, million in USA